Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49855, 49915)
Let controllers ignore initialization timeout when creating pods
Partially address https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48893#issuecomment-318540129.
This only updates the controllers that create pods with `GenerateName`.
The controllers ignore the timeout error when creating the pods, depending on how the initialization progress:
* If the initialization is successful in less than 5 mins, the controller will observe the creation via the informer. All is good.
* If the initialization fails, server will delete the pod, but the controller won't receive any event. The controller will not create new pod until the Creation expectation expires in 5 min.
* If the initialization takes too long (> 5 mins), the Creation expectation expires and the controller will create extra pods.
I'll send follow-up PRs to fix the latter two cases, e.g., by refactoring the sharedInformer.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47416, 47408, 49697, 49860, 50162)
fix error message for cronjob
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix error message for cronjob
expected an error would be better than unexpected lack of error.
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/cmd/genutils/genutils_test.go#L33
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46685, 49863, 50098, 50070, 50096)
Remove 0,1,3 from rand.String to avoid 'bad words'
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Remove 0,1,3 from the runes to prevent accidental bad words profanity
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#49543
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @mml @jamesawebb1 @spiffxp
**Release note**:
```release-note
Remove 0,1,3 from rand.String, to avoid 'bad words'
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50103, 49677, 49449, 43586, 48969)
Adding IPv6 to cidr_set and cidr_set_test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This allows IPv6 in cidr_set
Currently cidr_set only supports IPv4. This adds IPv6 compatibility and adds
IPv6 unit tests.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#43588
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The IPv6 code here makes some assumptions.
The subnets should be at least /64. (maximum 64 bits of prefix)
The subnet mask size cannot be greater than 30 more than the cluster mask size.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50103, 49677, 49449, 43586, 48969)
Add missing UID in SubjectAccessReviewSpec
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
WebhookAuthorizer's Authorize should send *all* the information
present in the user.Info data structure. We are not sending the
UID currently.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
The SubjectAccessReview API in the authorization.k8s.io API group now allows providing the user uid.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49237, 49656, 49980, 49841, 49899)
GC shouldn't send empty patch
The scope of the `if` statement was wrong, causing GC to sometimes send empty patch.
Found this bug while investigating https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/49966.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50029, 48517, 49739, 49866, 49782)
Update generated deepcopy code
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In generated deepcopy code, the method names in comments do not match the real method names.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#49755
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @sttts @caesarxuchao
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49870, 49416, 49872, 49892, 49908)
Renamed zoneNotReadyOrUnreachableTainer to zoneNoExecuteTainer.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: partially fixes#42001
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49898, 49897, 49919, 48860, 49491)
Fix usage a make(struct, len()) followed by append()
A couple of places in the code we allocate with make() but then use
append(), instead of copy() or direct assignment. This results in a
slice with len() zero elements at the front followed by the expected
data. The correct form for such usage is `make(struct, 0, len())`.
I found these by running:
```
$ git grep -EI -A7 'make\([^,]*, len\(' | grep 'append(' -B7 | grep -v vendor
```
And then manually looking through the results. I'm sure something better
could exist.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46519, 49794, 49720, 49692, 49821)
[route_controller] Emit event when failed to create route
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When route controller failed to create route for nodes, pod's networking is likely broken. We surface this situation through node condition (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/v1.7.2/pkg/controller/route/routecontroller.go#L197-L231), but this might not be easily tracked when user have a large cluster with many nodes. Surface the error through event might make things more obvious.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
cc @bowei
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46519, 49794, 49720, 49692, 49821)
Log attach detach controller skipping pods at higher priority
This will help us in tracking down problems related to pods
not getting added to desired state of world because of events
arriving out of order or some other problem related to that.
cc @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
A couple of places in the code we allocate with make() but then use
append(), instead of copy() or direct assignment. This results in a
slice with len() zero elements at the front followed by the expected
data. The correct form for such usage is `make(struct, 0, len())`.
I found these by running:
```
$ git grep -EI -A7 'make\([^,]*, len\(' | grep 'append(' -B7 | grep -v vendor
```
And then manually looking through the results. I'm sure something better
could exist.
This will help us in tracking down problems related to pods
not getting added to desired state of world because of events
arriving out of order or some other problem related to that.
Enhance the garbage collector to periodically refresh the resources it
monitors (via discovery) to enable custom resource definition GC.
This implementation caches Unstructured structs for any kinds not
covered by a shared informer. The existing meta-only codec only supports
compiled types; an improved codec which supports arbitrary types could
be introduced to optimize caching to store only metadata for all
non-informer types.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49619, 49598, 47267, 49597, 49638)
replicaset fix typo
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
reopen#47821
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@NickrenREN
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49665, 49689, 49495, 49146, 48934)
make it possible to allow discovery errors for controllers
Update the discovery client to return partial discovery information *and* an error. Since we can aggregate API servers, discovery of some resources can fail independently. Callers of this function who want to tolerate the errors can, existing callers will still get an error and fail in normal blocks.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48976, 49474, 40050, 49426, 49430)
Remove duplicated import and wrong alias name of api package
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#48975
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @caesarxuchao
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48224, 45431, 45946, 48775, 49396)
[client-go] Fake Dynamic Client
This commit converts `"k8s.io/client-go/dynamic".Client` to an interface, and implements fake versions of both `ClientPool` and `Client`. This allows components which make uses of these clients to be tested in the same way that clientset-based components can be tested, using the standard `testing.Fake` machinery.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48224, 45431, 45946, 48775, 49396)
add reflector metrics
This adds metrics (optionally prometheus) to reflectors so that you can see when one reflector is behaving poorly and just how poorly its doing.
@eparis
```release-note
Adds metrics for checking reflector health.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[trival] fix typo
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
some file word spell error that amend correct
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue
deployment: SetNewReplicaSetAnnotations() should compare revisions as numbers than strings
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1) SetNewReplicaSetAnnotations() when deployment revision annotation is copied over to RS, it performs a string comparison instead of int comparison, due to this any revision beyond 9 might not get copied.
2) Slightly improves the coverage by adding UT for Annotation related functions
3) Upgrade the test suite to use go-langs sub-test, which is very useful while investigating UT related failures.
```
--- FAIL: TestAnnotationUtils (0.00s)
--- FAIL: TestAnnotationUtils/SetNewReplicaSetAnnotations (0.00s)
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=10 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=11 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=12 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=13 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=14 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=15 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=16 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=17 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=18 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=19 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=20 Obtained=9
--- PASS: TestAnnotationUtils/SetReplicasAnnotations (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestAnnotationUtils/IsSaturated (0.00s)
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**: None
```release-note
```
cc: @kargakis
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49420, 49296, 49299, 49371, 46514)
Refactoring taint functions to reduce sprawl
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#45060
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@gmarek @timothysc @k82cn @jayunit100 - I moved some fn's to helpers and some to utils. LMK, if you are ok with this change.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This adds an interface form of dynamic.Client and
dynamic.ResourceClient, making those two follow the general client
conventions: `Interface` is an interface, and `Client` is the concrete
implementation. `ClientPool` retains it's interface status.
This allows us to create a fake implemenation of dyanmic.Interface,
dynamic.ResourceInterface, and dynamic.ClientPool for testing.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49328, 49285, 49307, 49127, 49163)
fix mutation in statefulset sync
Original issue: https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/15324
Seems like something inside `UpdateStatefulSet` mutates the StatefulSet. We might need to dig deeper to find the exact location where the non-copy mutation happens.
Kubernetes Submit Queue