Using daemonset to bring up a pod on each node of cluster,
right now the docs suggests to bring up a pod on each node by
manually dropping the pod manifests into directory /etc/kubernetes/manifests.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 32663, 35797)
contribute deis/registry-proxy as a replacement for kube-registry-proxy
This PR is a proposal to replace the `kube-registry-proxy` addon code with [deis/registry-proxy](https://github.com/deis/registry-proxy). We have been running this component in production for several months ([since Workflow v2.3.0](15d4c1c298/workflow-v2.3.0/tpl/deis-registry-proxy-daemon.yaml)) without any issues.
There are several benefits that this proxy provides over the current implementation:
- it's the same code that is provided in [docker/distribution's contrib dir](https://github.com/docker/distribution/tree/master/contrib/compose) which I have personally used for both Docker v1 and v2 engine deployments without any issues
- the ability to [disable old Docker clients](https://github.com/deis/registry-proxy/blob/master/rootfs/etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf.in#L19-L23) that are incompatible with the v2 registry
- better default connection timeouts, using best practices from the Docker community as a whole
- workarounds for bugs like https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/1486 (see https://github.com/deis/registry-proxy/blob/master/rootfs/etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf.in#L15-L16)
Things that this PR differs from the current implementation:
- it's not HAProxy.
I'm not sure how the release process goes for this component, but I bumped the version to v0.4 and changed the maintainer to myself considering this is a massive overhaul. Please let me know if this is acceptable as a replacement or if we should perhaps consider this as an alternative implementation.
Happy Friday!
https://hub.docker.com/r/library/registry/tags/
`registry:2` is constantly being updated with new versions. This means there's a possibility that the image may be changed unintentionally. For example, when the Pod is rescheduled on nodes that does not already have the image, depending on the time of the pull, `registry:2` may result in different images.
Fix this to the latest `registry:2.5.1` instead to avoid this problem.
We can then avoid the following warning:
```
WARNING: The '--' argument must be specified between gcloud specific args on the left and DOCKER_ARGS on the right. IMPORTANT: previously, commands allowed the omission of the --, and unparsed arguments were treated as implementation args. This usage is being deprecated and will be removed in March 2017.
This will be strictly enforced in March 2017. Use 'gcloud beta docker' to see new behavior.
```
Signed-off-by: Jess Frazelle <acidburn@google.com>
This registry can be accessed through proxies that run on each node
listening on port 5000. We send the proxy images to the nodes directly
to avoid requests that hit the network during cluster launch. For now,
we continue to pull the registry itself over the network, especially
given its large size (we should be able to dramatically shrink the
image). On GCE we create a PD and use that for storage, otherwise we
use an emptyDir. The registry is not enabled outside of GCE. All
communication is currently plain HTTP. In order to use SSL, we will
need to be able to request a certificate/key from the apiserver signed
by the apiserver's CA cert.
Jeff Grafton