Commit Graph

224 Commits (6685715c4ca1f143108273edd038806b2bb5fd72)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wojciech Tyczynski 7452bc3f5b Tune traces thresholds in etcdHelper 2016-05-16 11:10:31 +02:00
k8s-merge-robot be104a8271 Merge pull request #25415 from hongchaodeng/e2
Automatic merge from submit-queue

etcd_watcher: make Deleted Event.Object's version consistent

### What's the problem?

In [sendDelete()](995f022808/pkg/storage/etcd/etcd_watcher.go (L437-L442)), Deleted Event.Object's resource version will be set to the latest resource version. This is actually an assumption made by cacher that all later events should have objects with larger verions; See [here](995f022808/pkg/storage/cacher.go (L579-L581)).

In sendModify(), it could also return Deleted event. However, the resource version is still the old version, which is inconsistent behavior with sendDelete().

### What's this PR?
This PR sets the version of oldObj in sendModify() to be the latest version.
Provided unit test for it.
2016-05-14 20:46:20 -07:00
Matt Liggett 2bc46d5085 It's 2016, yo. 2016-05-13 12:41:40 -07:00
Hongchao Deng 5337bc220a etcd_watcher: test for ensuring delete event have latest index 2016-05-12 11:01:26 -07:00
Hongchao Deng fcf63a6c4b etcd_watcher: make Deleted Event.Object's version consistent 2016-05-12 11:01:26 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot aa8fddb7d9 Merge pull request #25369 from liggitt/cached-watch
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Return 'too old' errors from watch cache via watch stream

Fixes #25151

This PR updates the API server to produce the same results when a watch is attempted with a resourceVersion that is too old, regardless of whether the etcd watch cache is enabled. The expected result is a `200` http status, with a single watch event of type `ERROR`. Previously, the watch cache would deliver a `410` http response.

This is the uncached watch impl:
```
// Implements storage.Interface.
func (h *etcdHelper) WatchList(ctx context.Context, key string, resourceVersion string, filter storage.FilterFunc) (watch.Interface, error) {
	if ctx == nil {
		glog.Errorf("Context is nil")
	}
	watchRV, err := storage.ParseWatchResourceVersion(resourceVersion)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	key = h.prefixEtcdKey(key)
	w := newEtcdWatcher(true, h.quorum, exceptKey(key), filter, h.codec, h.versioner, nil, h)
	go w.etcdWatch(ctx, h.etcdKeysAPI, key, watchRV)
	return w, nil
}
```

once the resourceVersion parses, there is no path that returns a direct error, so all errors would have to be returned as an `ERROR` event via the ResultChan().
2016-05-10 18:15:15 -07:00
Hongchao Deng cd3f7f41c1 etcd3/watcher: refactor test 2016-05-10 12:37:31 -07:00
Hongchao Deng da7e9783e8 etcd3/watcher: Event.Object should have the same rev as etcd delete
instead of previous object's revision.
2016-05-10 10:53:53 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt f80b59ba87 Return 'too old' errors from watch cache via watch stream 2016-05-10 10:59:53 -04:00
Hongchao Deng 97f4647dc3 etcd3/watcher: fix goroutine leak if ctx is canceled
In reflector.go, it could probably call Stop() without retrieving all results
from ResultChan().
A potential leak is that when an error has happened, it could block on resultChan,
and then cancelling context in Stop() wouldn't unblock it.
This fixes the problem by making it also select ctx.Done and cancel context
afterwards if error happened.
2016-05-09 09:06:11 -07:00
Robert Bailey 24c69f0b14 Merge pull request #25211 from lavalamp/leak
Never leak the etcd watcher's translate goroutine
2016-05-06 15:03:21 -07:00
Daniel Smith 995f022808 Never leak the etcd watcher's translate goroutine 2016-05-05 11:19:12 -07:00
Hongchao Deng 3144ebc7fc start etcd compactor in background 2016-05-04 16:01:03 -07:00
Hongchao Deng 84c07b0bbf etcd3/store: userUpdate error should be returned 2016-05-03 14:42:29 +08:00
Clayton Coleman fdb110c859
Fix the rest of the code 2016-04-29 17:12:10 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot 11298d02e0 Merge pull request #24455 from hongchaodeng/fl
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Provide flags to use etcd3 backed storage

ref: #24405

What's in this PR?
- Add a new flag "storage-backend" to choose "etcd2" or "etcd3". By default (i.e. empty), it's "etcd2".
- Take out etcd config code into a standalone package and let it create etcd2 or etcd3 storage backend given user input.
2016-04-29 08:49:04 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot d0b887e4e0 Merge pull request #24595 from zhouhaibing089/httpserverclose
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Uncomment the code that caused by #19254

Fix https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24546.

@lavalamp
2016-04-28 01:41:16 -07:00
Hongchao Deng c0071a1595 add flags to enable etcd3 2016-04-28 09:48:16 +08:00
k8s-merge-robot 28bc4b32c2 Merge pull request #24532 from rsc/master
Automatic merge from submit-queue

apiserver latency reductions

Combined effect of these two commits on the latency observed by the 1000-node kubemark benchmark:

```
name                               old ms/op  new ms/op   delta
LIST_nodes_p50                      127 ±16%    121 ± 9%   -4.58%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p90                      326 ±12%    266 ±12%  -18.48%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p99                      453 ±11%    400 ±14%  -11.79%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p50    29.4 ±49%   26.2 ±54%     ~     (p=0.085 n=30+29)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p90    83.0 ±78%   68.6 ±59%  -17.33%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p99     216 ±43%    177 ±49%  -17.68%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p50                    24.5 ±14%   24.3 ±13%     ~     (p=0.562 n=30+29)
DELETE_pods_p90                    30.7 ± 1%   30.7 ± 1%   -0.30%  (p=0.011 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p99                    77.2 ±34%   54.2 ±23%  -29.76%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p50     5.86 ±26%   5.94 ±32%     ~     (p=0.734 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p90     15.8 ± 7%   15.5 ± 6%   -2.06%  (p=0.010 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p99     57.8 ±35%   39.5 ±55%  -31.60%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
PUT_nodes_p50                      14.9 ± 2%   14.8 ± 2%   -0.68%  (p=0.012 n=30+27)
PUT_nodes_p90                      16.5 ± 1%   16.3 ± 2%   -0.90%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_nodes_p99                      57.9 ±47%   41.3 ±35%  -28.61%  (p=0.000 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p50    6.35 ±29%   6.34 ±20%     ~     (p=0.944 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p90    15.4 ± 5%   15.0 ± 5%   -2.18%  (p=0.001 n=29+29)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p99    52.2 ±71%   32.9 ±46%  -36.99%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
POST_pods_p50                      8.99 ±13%   8.95 ±16%     ~     (p=0.903 n=30+29)
POST_pods_p90                      16.2 ± 4%   16.1 ± 4%     ~     (p=0.287 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p99                      30.9 ±21%   26.4 ±12%  -14.73%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
POST_bindings_p50                  9.34 ±12%   8.92 ±15%   -4.54%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
POST_bindings_p90                  16.6 ± 1%   16.5 ± 3%   -0.73%  (p=0.017 n=28+29)
POST_bindings_p99                  23.5 ± 9%   21.1 ± 4%  -10.09%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_pods_p50                       10.8 ±11%   10.2 ± 5%   -5.47%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_pods_p90                       16.1 ± 1%   16.0 ± 1%   -0.64%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
PUT_pods_p99                       23.4 ± 9%   20.9 ± 9%  -10.93%  (p=0.000 n=28+27)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p50  2.42 ±16%   2.50 ±13%     ~     (p=0.054 n=29+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p90  11.5 ±12%   11.8 ±13%     ~     (p=0.141 n=30+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p99  19.5 ±21%   19.1 ±21%     ~     (p=0.397 n=29+29)
GET_nodes_p50                      0.77 ±10%   0.76 ±10%     ~     (p=0.317 n=28+28)
GET_nodes_p90                      1.20 ±16%   1.14 ±24%   -4.66%  (p=0.036 n=28+29)
GET_nodes_p99                      11.4 ±48%    7.5 ±46%  -34.28%  (p=0.000 n=28+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p50     0.74 ±17%   0.73 ±17%     ~     (p=0.222 n=30+28)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p90     1.04 ±25%   1.01 ±27%     ~     (p=0.231 n=30+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p99     12.1 ±81%  10.0 ±145%     ~     (p=0.063 n=28+29)
GET_pods_p50                       0.78 ±12%   0.77 ±10%     ~     (p=0.178 n=30+28)
GET_pods_p90                       1.06 ±19%   1.02 ±19%     ~     (p=0.120 n=29+28)
GET_pods_p99                       3.92 ±43%   2.45 ±38%  -37.55%  (p=0.000 n=27+25)
LIST_services_p50                  0.20 ±13%   0.20 ±16%     ~     (p=0.854 n=28+29)
LIST_services_p90                  0.28 ±15%   0.27 ±14%     ~     (p=0.219 n=29+28)
LIST_services_p99                  0.49 ±20%   0.47 ±24%     ~     (p=0.140 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p50                 0.19 ±14%   0.19 ±15%     ~     (p=0.709 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p90                 0.26 ±16%   0.26 ±13%     ~     (p=0.274 n=29+28)
LIST_endpoints_p99                 0.46 ±24%   0.44 ±21%     ~     (p=0.111 n=29+29)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p50  0.16 ±15%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.253 n=30+27)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p90  0.22 ±24%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.152 n=30+28)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p99  0.31 ±33%   0.31 ±38%     ~     (p=0.817 n=28+29)
LIST_daemonsets_p50                0.16 ±20%   0.15 ±11%     ~     (p=0.135 n=30+27)
LIST_daemonsets_p90                0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±25%     ~     (p=0.135 n=29+28)
LIST_daemonsets_p99                0.29 ±28%   0.29 ±32%     ~     (p=0.606 n=28+28)
LIST_jobs_p50                      0.16 ±16%   0.15 ±12%     ~     (p=0.375 n=29+28)
LIST_jobs_p90                      0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.090 n=29+26)
LIST_jobs_p99                      0.31 ±28%   0.28 ±35%  -10.29%  (p=0.005 n=29+27)
LIST_deployments_p50               0.15 ±16%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.565 n=29+28)
LIST_deployments_p90               0.22 ±22%   0.21 ±19%     ~     (p=0.107 n=30+28)
LIST_deployments_p99               0.31 ±27%   0.29 ±34%     ~     (p=0.068 n=29+28)
LIST_namespaces_p50                0.21 ±25%   0.21 ±26%     ~     (p=0.768 n=29+27)
LIST_namespaces_p90                0.28 ±29%   0.26 ±25%     ~     (p=0.101 n=30+28)
LIST_namespaces_p99                0.30 ±48%   0.29 ±42%     ~     (p=0.339 n=30+29)
LIST_replicasets_p50               0.15 ±18%   0.15 ±16%     ~     (p=0.612 n=30+28)
LIST_replicasets_p90               0.22 ±19%   0.21 ±18%   -5.13%  (p=0.011 n=28+27)
LIST_replicasets_p99               0.31 ±39%   0.28 ±29%     ~     (p=0.066 n=29+28)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p50         0.16 ±23%   0.15 ±21%     ~     (p=0.124 n=30+29)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p90         0.21 ±23%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.092 n=30+25)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p99         0.21 ±24%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.053 n=30+25)
LIST_resourcequotas_p50            0.16 ±12%   0.16 ±13%     ~     (p=0.175 n=27+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p90            0.20 ±22%   0.20 ±24%     ~     (p=0.388 n=30+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p99            0.22 ±24%   0.22 ±23%     ~     (p=0.575 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p50    0.15 ±21%   0.15 ±29%     ~     (p=0.079 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p90    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p99    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_pods_p50                      68.0 ±16%   56.3 ± 9%  -17.19%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_pods_p90                       119 ±19%     93 ± 8%  -21.88%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
LIST_pods_p99                       230 ±18%    202 ±14%  -12.13%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
```
2016-04-27 08:32:18 -07:00
zhouhaibing089 bf1a3f99c0 Uncomment the code that cause by #19254 2016-04-25 23:21:31 +08:00
Hongchao Deng b0f4517e65 etcd3/watcher: cancelling context shouldn't return error 2016-04-22 12:23:04 +08:00
Russ Cox 6a19e46ed6 pkg/storage: cache timers
A previous change here replaced time.After with an explicit
timer that can be stopped, to avoid filling up the active timer list
with timers that are no longer needed. But an even better fix is to
reuse the timers across calls, to avoid filling the allocated heap
with work for the garbage collector. On top of that, try a quick
non-blocking send to avoid the timer entirely.

For the e2e 1000-node kubemark test, basically everything gets faster,
some things significantly so. The 90th and 99th percentile for LIST nodes
in particular are the worst case that has caused SLO/SLA problems
in the past, and this reduces 99th percentile by 10%.

name                               old ms/op  new ms/op   delta
LIST_nodes_p50                      127 ±16%    124 ±13%     ~     (p=0.136 n=29+29)
LIST_nodes_p90                      326 ±12%    278 ±15%  -14.85%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
LIST_nodes_p99                      453 ±11%    405 ±19%  -10.70%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p50    29.4 ±49%   26.6 ±43%     ~     (p=0.176 n=30+29)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p90    83.0 ±78%   68.7 ±63%  -17.30%  (p=0.020 n=30+29)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p99     216 ±43%    173 ±41%  -19.53%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
DELETE_pods_p50                    24.5 ±14%   24.3 ±17%     ~     (p=0.562 n=30+28)
DELETE_pods_p90                    30.7 ± 1%   30.6 ± 0%   -0.44%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
DELETE_pods_p99                    77.2 ±34%   56.3 ±27%  -26.99%  (p=0.000 n=30+28)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p50     5.86 ±26%   5.83 ±36%     ~     (p=1.000 n=29+28)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p90     15.8 ± 7%   15.9 ± 6%     ~     (p=0.936 n=29+28)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p99     57.8 ±35%   56.7 ±41%     ~     (p=0.725 n=29+28)
PUT_nodes_p50                      14.9 ± 2%   14.9 ± 1%   -0.55%  (p=0.020 n=30+28)
PUT_nodes_p90                      16.5 ± 1%   16.4 ± 2%   -0.60%  (p=0.040 n=27+28)
PUT_nodes_p99                      57.9 ±47%   44.6 ±42%  -23.02%  (p=0.000 n=30+29)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p50    6.35 ±29%   6.33 ±23%     ~     (p=0.957 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p90    15.4 ± 5%   15.2 ± 6%   -1.14%  (p=0.034 n=29+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p99    52.2 ±71%   53.4 ±52%     ~     (p=0.720 n=29+27)
POST_pods_p50                      8.99 ±13%   9.33 ±13%   +3.79%  (p=0.023 n=30+29)
POST_pods_p90                      16.2 ± 4%   16.3 ± 4%     ~     (p=0.113 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p99                      30.9 ±21%   28.4 ±23%   -8.26%  (p=0.001 n=28+29)
POST_bindings_p50                  9.34 ±12%   8.98 ±17%     ~     (p=0.083 n=30+29)
POST_bindings_p90                  16.6 ± 1%   16.5 ± 2%   -0.76%  (p=0.000 n=28+26)
POST_bindings_p99                  23.5 ± 9%   21.4 ± 5%   -8.98%  (p=0.000 n=27+27)
PUT_pods_p50                       10.8 ±11%   10.3 ± 5%   -4.67%  (p=0.000 n=30+28)
PUT_pods_p90                       16.1 ± 1%   16.0 ± 1%   -0.55%  (p=0.003 n=29+29)
PUT_pods_p99                       23.4 ± 9%   21.6 ±14%   -8.03%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p50  2.42 ±16%   2.50 ±13%     ~     (p=0.072 n=29+29)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p90  11.5 ±12%   11.7 ±10%     ~     (p=0.190 n=30+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p99  19.5 ±21%   19.0 ±22%     ~     (p=0.298 n=29+28)
GET_nodes_p90                      1.20 ±16%   1.18 ±19%     ~     (p=0.626 n=28+29)
GET_nodes_p99                      11.4 ±48%    8.3 ±40%  -27.31%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p90     1.04 ±25%   1.03 ±21%     ~     (p=0.682 n=30+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p99     12.1 ±81%  10.0 ±123%     ~     (p=0.135 n=28+28)
GET_pods_p90                       1.06 ±19%   1.08 ±21%     ~     (p=0.597 n=29+29)
GET_pods_p99                       3.92 ±43%   2.81 ±39%  -28.39%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
LIST_pods_p50                      68.0 ±16%   65.3 ±13%     ~     (p=0.066 n=29+29)
LIST_pods_p90                       119 ±19%    115 ±12%     ~     (p=0.091 n=28+27)
LIST_pods_p99                       230 ±18%    226 ±21%     ~     (p=0.251 n=27+28)
2016-04-21 15:53:47 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot 85de6acadc Merge pull request #23208 from deads2k/fix-version-override
Automatic merge from submit-queue

make storage enablement, serialization, and location orthogonal

This allows a caller (command-line, config, code) to specify multiple separate pieces of config information regarding storage and have them properly composed at runtime.  The information provided is exposed through interfaces to allow alternate implementations, which allows us to change the expression of the config moving forward.  I also fixed up the types to be correct as I moved through.

The same options still exist, but they're composed slightly differently
 1. specify target etcd servers per Group or per GroupResource
 1. specify storage GroupVersions per Groups or per GroupResource
 1. specify etcd prefixes per GroupVersion or per GroupResource
 1. specify that multiple GroupResources share the same location in etcd
 1. enable GroupResources by GroupVersion or by GroupResource whitelist or GroupResource blacklist

The `storage.Interface` is built per GroupResource by:
 1. find the set of possible storage GroupResource based on the priority list of cohabitators
 1. choose a GroupResource from the set by looking at which Groups have the resource enabled
 1. find the target etcd server, etcd prefix, and storage encoding based on the GroupResource

The API server can have its resources separately enabled, but for now I've kept them linked.

@liggitt I think we need this (or something like it) to be able to go from config to these interfaces.  Given another round of refactoring, we may be able to reshape these to be more forward driving.

@smarterclayton this is important for rebasing and for a seamless 1.2 to 1.3 migration for us.
2016-04-21 08:24:29 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot 0a5d57a383 Merge pull request #24079 from hongchaodeng/comp
Automatic merge from submit-queue

etcd3 store: provide compactor util

What's this PR?
- Provides a util to compact keys in etcd.

Reason:
We want to save the most recent 10 minutes event history. It should be more than enough for slow watchers. It is not number based, so it can tolerate event bursts too. We do not want to save longer since the current storage API cannot take advantage of the multi-version key yet. We might keep a longer history in the future.
2016-04-21 05:19:54 -07:00
deads2k 6670b73b18 make storage enablement, serialization, and location orthogonal 2016-04-21 08:18:55 -04:00
Hongchao Deng 2bc022aad4 watcher test: print more info for debugging 2016-04-21 06:56:50 +08:00
Hongchao Deng 46214c60bb etcd3/store: support TTL in Create, Update 2016-04-19 07:35:59 +08:00
Hongchao Deng e18b4e67be etcd3/store: watcher implementation 2016-04-18 21:41:53 +08:00
k8s-merge-robot 5f3f06f0b1 Merge pull request #24022 from hongchaodeng/dep
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Bump up etcd dependency to fix data race

ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/23694

What this PR does
- Bumping up the godep of etcd to fix data race in etcd watcher. Without this change, watcher PR builds will fail in race detection.
- Small changes to fix builds after upgrade
2016-04-17 12:01:32 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot 2bf52175f9 Merge pull request #23923 from hongchaodeng/exp
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Decouple etcd node.expiration logic from DeleitonTimestamp

ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/23902
2016-04-17 04:12:26 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot a275a045d1 Merge pull request #23914 from sky-uk/make-etcd-cache-size-configurable
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Make etcd cache size configurable

Instead of the prior 50K limit, allow users to specify a more sensible size for their cluster.

I'm not sure what a sensible default is here. I'm still experimenting on my own clusters. 50 gives me a 270MB max footprint. 50K caused my apiserver to run out of memory as it exceeded >2GB. I believe that number is far too large for most people's use cases.

There are some other fundamental issues that I'm not addressing here:
- Old etcd items are cached and potentially never removed (it stores using modifiedIndex, and doesn't remove the old object when it gets updated)
- Cache isn't LRU, so there's no guarantee the cache remains hot. This makes its performance difficult to predict. More of an issue with a smaller cache size.
- 1.2 etcd entries seem to have a larger memory footprint (I never had an issue in 1.1, even though this cache existed there). I suspect that's due to image lists on the node status.

This is provided as a fix for #23323
2016-04-17 00:06:31 -07:00
Hongchao Deng 9f43a110d9 file rename; refactor 2016-04-16 01:51:29 +08:00
Andy Goldstein 049e63d253 Honor starting resourceVersion in watch cache
Compare the requested resourceVersion to each event's resourceVersion to ensure events that occurred
in the past are not sent to the client.
2016-04-14 09:37:22 -04:00
Hongchao Deng b9745999c9 Decouple etcd node.expiration logic from DeleitonTimestamp 2016-04-13 15:11:53 -07:00
Daniel Smith 4c539bf082 Merge pull request #23490 from wojtek-t/remove_set_from_storage_interface
Remove Set() from storage.Interface.
2016-04-13 14:22:05 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt ada60236f7 Make watch cache behave like uncached watch 2016-04-12 10:14:07 -04:00
James Ravn 5bb0595260 Make deserialization cache size configurable
Instead of the default 50K entries, allow users to specify more sensible
sizes for their cluster.
2016-04-12 13:42:27 +01:00
Hongchao Deng ab9ac70e56 etcd3 store: provide compactor util 2016-04-09 11:01:27 -07:00
Hongchao Deng 71b46f3f57 fix build 2016-04-07 19:22:28 -07:00
Wojciech Tyczynski 53f433f019 Remove Set() from storage.Interface. 2016-04-04 17:54:18 +02:00
k8s-merge-robot f5c93c8ddc Merge pull request #23472 from wojtek-t/fix_object_meta_for
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Switch from api.ObjectMetaFor to meta.Accessor in most of places

Fix #23278

@smarterclayton @lavalamp
2016-04-02 02:33:40 -07:00
Wojciech Tyczynski 2699be2e7e Switch api.ObjetaMetaFor to meta.Accessor 2016-03-31 17:52:31 +02:00
Hongchao Deng 00ddf0671d etcd (v3) store: implements KV methods of storage.Interface
This implements Get(), Create(), Delete(), GetToList(),
List(), GuaranteedUpdate().
2016-03-30 10:20:39 -07:00
Chao Xu 31b425b3a1 add delete precondition 2016-03-25 11:21:39 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot 4e4ad61260 Merge pull request #23366 from goltermann/vet
Auto commit by PR queue bot
2016-03-24 21:50:56 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot 2777cd7e75 Merge pull request #23295 from hongchaodeng/error
Auto commit by PR queue bot
2016-03-23 02:27:36 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot 4af38b52b9 Merge pull request #22736 from resouer/fix-util-dev
Auto commit by PR queue bot
2016-03-22 19:54:58 -07:00
goltermann 34d4eaea08 Fixing several (but not all) go vet errors. Most are around string formatting, or unreachable code. 2016-03-22 17:26:50 -07:00
Hongchao Deng 189ce6e397 storage: add custom storage error 2016-03-22 08:19:16 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot 2bb6f74bf9 Merge pull request #23099 from shawnps/patch-12
Auto commit by PR queue bot
2016-03-21 09:19:21 -07:00