Commit Graph

3174 Commits (6522344bb0fbf13e4605c753304e73d2807aa49f)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Łukasz Oleś b32afe1720 kubectl: respect DaemonSet strategy parameters for rollout status
It handles "after-merge" comments from #41116
2017-03-09 20:02:52 +01:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue d306acca86 Merge pull request #42175 from enisoc/controller-ref-dep
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Deployment: Fully Respect ControllerRef

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

This is part of the completion of the [ControllerRef](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md) proposal. It brings Deployment into full compliance with ControllerRef. See the individual commit messages for details.

**Which issue this PR fixes**:

This ensures that Deployment does not fight with other controllers over control of Pods and ReplicaSets.

Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24433

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

**Release note**:

```release-note
Deployment now fully respects ControllerRef to avoid fighting over Pods and ReplicaSets. At the time of upgrade, **you must not have Deployments with selectors that overlap**, or else [ownership of ReplicaSets may change](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md#upgrading).
```
cc @erictune @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
2017-03-07 20:44:36 -08:00
xilabao a01cf0e66b add "use" to validResourceVerbs 2017-03-07 00:42:24 -06:00
Anthony Yeh 8c4bcb38fb Deployment: Filter by ControllerRef in Reaper.
We don't want to delete ReplicaSets we don't own.
2017-03-06 15:12:08 -08:00
Anthony Yeh cec3899b96 Deployment: Remove Overlap and SelectorUpdate annotations.
These are not used anymore since ControllerRef now protects against
fighting between controllers with overlapping selectors.
2017-03-06 15:12:08 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 90a4eda96b Merge pull request #41809 from kargakis/rollout-status-fix
Automatic merge from submit-queue

kubectl: respect deployment strategy parameters for rollout status

Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40496

`rollout status` now respects the strategy parameters for a RollingUpdate Deployment. This means that it will exit as soon as minimum availability is reached for a rollout (note that if you allow maximum availability, `rollout status` will succeed as soon as the new pods are created)

@janetkuo @AdoHe ptal
2017-03-04 19:35:21 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue db4fbf5958 Merge pull request #42369 from smarterclayton/get_warning
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Output of `kubectl get` is inconsistent for pods

Builds on top of fixes from #42283, only the last two commits are new. Reverts behavior of #39042 which was inconsistent and confusing.

Fixes #15853
2017-03-03 23:12:38 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue b33d0fb394 Merge pull request #42391 from liggitt/patch-output
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42443, 38924, 42367, 42391, 42310)

Fix 'not patched' kubectl error

fixes #42384
2017-03-03 18:08:44 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue f7c07a121d Merge pull request #42285 from liggitt/get-watch
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41919, 41149, 42350, 42351, 42285)

Fix error printing objects from kubectl get -w

Fixes #42276
2017-03-03 16:44:45 -08:00
Michail Kargakis d20ac8766e kubectl: respect deployment strategy parameters for rollout status 2017-03-03 14:12:08 +01:00
Clayton Coleman 34e4337e57
Don't print the "filtered" message on generic output
Unify the various output displays and make them simpler. Don't write to
glog, but only output the info when `-v 2` to stderr.
2017-03-02 15:58:25 -05:00
Clayton Coleman 4e7c10a520
Don't bypass filter on generic output
It is inconsistent and confusing (filtering is orthogonal from output)
and we don't want to regress behavior from 1.5.
2017-03-02 15:58:22 -05:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue a9ac50051c Merge pull request #41924 from ymqytw/change_saveConfig
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41984, 41682, 41924, 41928)

make edit respect --save-config

New behavior:

edit:
1) the flag is set to true: it will create or update the last-applied-config annotation
2) the flag is set to false or is unspecified: NOP

replace:
1) If saveConfig is true, create or update the annotation.
2) If saveConfig is false and the local config file doesn't have the annotation, we save the annotation from the live object if there is one (Try to not surprise the users).
3) If saveConfig is false and the local config file has the annotation, we use the annotation in the config file.
4) Same behavior for force replacing

fixes #40626

```release-note
stop kubectl edit from updating the last-applied-configuration annotation when --save-config is unspecified or false.
```

@pwittrock @liggitt 

This is a bug fix that prevented `edit` from being respected by `apply`
2017-03-02 10:51:16 -08:00
Jordan Liggitt 2802e5af27
Fix 'not patched' kubectl error 2017-03-02 01:00:48 -05:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue c7b53794d0 Merge pull request #39683 from soltysh/move_deployments
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Add apps/v1beta1 deployments with new defaults

This pull introduces deployments under `apps/v1beta1` and fixes #23597 and #23304.

TODO:

* [x] - create new type `apps/v1beta1.Deployment`
* [x] - update kubectl (stop, scale)
* [ ] - ~~new `kubectl run` generator~~ - this will only duplicate half of generator code, I suggest replacing current to use new endpoint
* [ ] - ~~create extended tests~~ - I've added integration and cmd tests verifying new endpoints
* [ ] - ~~create `hack/test-update-storage-objects.sh`~~ - see above

This is currently blocked by https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38071, due to conflicting name `v1beta1.Deployment`. 

```release-note
Introduce apps/v1beta1.Deployments resource with modified defaults compared to extensions/v1beta1.Deployments.
```

@kargakis @mfojtik @kubernetes/sig-apps-misc
2017-03-01 08:29:26 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 50943d1783 Merge pull request #42191 from smarterclayton/dockercfg_secret
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42316, 41618, 42201, 42113, 42191)

Make 'docker-email' optional on dockercfg secrets

It is not required for most username/password registries.

Fixes #41727
2017-03-01 07:48:33 -08:00
Maciej Szulik c272630b1b Deployments under apps/v1beta1 with new defaults 2017-03-01 15:14:41 +01:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue e99ab5ada4 Merge pull request #42267 from liggitt/discovery-caching
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Prevent caching empty discovery docs

If kubectl makes requests before a server fully initialized, it could cache bad discovery responses (results of a partially forbidden discovery call, etc)

This changes to only cache responses that included at least one group or resource so that total failure doesn't get cached for 5 minutes
2017-03-01 06:11:01 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue ba7c533fb0 Merge pull request #42103 from superbrothers/kubectl-context-completion
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38676, 41765, 42103, 41833, 41702)

Support --context flag completion for kubectl

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

With this PR, `--context` flag completion is supported for kubectl.

**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

**Release note**:

```release-note
```
2017-03-01 01:44:07 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 83846e3a6a Merge pull request #41705 from liggitt/patch-output-result
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41597, 42185, 42075, 42178, 41705)

Honor output formats in kubectl patch

Currently, output formats other than `-o name` are only honored when in `--local` mode.

This PR also prints the result from the server when in regular mode
2017-03-01 00:36:12 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue eaf3c47489 Merge pull request #42115 from justinsb/kubectl_expose_drainoptions
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42162, 41973, 42015, 42115, 41923)

kubectl drain: make code reusable

DrainOptions requires a few fields to be set, and the expectation is
that these are set as part of construction of the object.  If they are
set, then the drain code can be reused in other kubernetes projects.

This does not create a contract that DrainOptions should fulfill going
forwards, any more than any of the other types that happen to be exposed
are part of the contract.  Instead, this merely makes use outside the
package possible.

```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-28 22:06:03 -08:00
Jordan Liggitt 091aac7e1e
Prevent caching empty discovery docs 2017-02-28 23:43:32 -05:00
Jordan Liggitt 31b3e01f1e
Fix error printing objects from kubectl get -w 2017-02-28 22:36:26 -05:00
Clayton Coleman bace937438
Don't filter items when resources requested by name
Add tracking on resource.Builder if a "named" item is requested (from
file, stream, url, or resource args) and use that in `get` to accurately
determine whether to filter resources. Add tests.
2017-02-28 19:19:33 -05:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 34b31c8f32 Merge pull request #41699 from liggitt/apply-output-result
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40746, 41699, 42108, 42174, 42093)

Output result of apply operation

Fixes #41690 

Plumbs the resulting object from patch operations back to the top level so it can be output when printing
2017-02-28 07:51:22 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue bdb141a60f Merge pull request #40746 from matthyx/master
Automatic merge from submit-queue

numeric ordering of kubectl outputs

**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Instead of having kubectl listing the pods in a alphabetical way:
foobar-1-build
foobar-10-build
foobar-2-build
foobar-3-build
With the parameter --sort-by '{.metadata.name}' it now gives:
foobar-1-build
foobar-2-build
foobar-3-build
foobar-10-build

**Which issue this PR fixes**
https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/7229

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I have followed the dependencies requirements from https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/godep.md

**Release note**:

```release-note
Import a natural sorting library and use it in the sorting printer.
```
2017-02-28 07:45:37 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 8ceb0c4025 Merge pull request #41151 from ahakanbaba/tpr-unit-tests
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41937, 41151, 42092, 40269, 42135)

Add a unit test for idempotent applys to the TPR entries.

The test in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
The apply operation expects a last-modified-configuration annotation.
That is written verbatim in the test/fixture file.

References #40841



**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds one unit test for TPR's using applies. 

**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
References: 
https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/95
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40841#issue-204769102


**Special notes for your reviewer**:

I am not super proud of the tpr-entry name. 
But I feel like we need to call the two objects differently. 
The one which has Kind:ThirdPartyResource 
and the one has Kind:Foo. 

Is the name "ThirdPartyResource" used interchangeably for both ? I used tpr-entry for the Kind:Foo object.

Also I !assume! this is testing an idempotent apply because the last-applied-configuration annotation is the same as the object itself. 

This is the state I see in the logs of kubectl if I do a proper idempotent apply of a third party resource entry. 

I guess I will know more once I start playing around with apply command that change TPR objects. 

**Release note**:

```release-note
```
2017-02-28 01:24:06 -08:00
Matthias Bertschy 336a78aeaf Use natural sorting for strings in sorting_printer
Import new dependency vbom.ml/util/sortorder
Run ./hack/update-bazel.sh
2017-02-28 07:50:44 +01:00
Clayton Coleman ec753da074
Make 'docker-email' optional on dockercfg secrets
It is not required for most username/password registries.
2017-02-27 17:13:08 -05:00
ymqytw 1cebb2c1bb make edit respect --save-config 2017-02-27 13:34:07 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 6d9e2afeda Merge pull request #40927 from soltysh/deployment_logs
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42053, 41282, 42056, 41663, 40927)

Allow getting logs directly from deployment, job and statefulset

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@smarterclayton you asked for it in OpenShift


```release-note
kubectl logs allows getting logs directly from deployment, job and statefulset
```
2017-02-27 12:45:36 -08:00
Hakan Baba 1cc30bdfb2 Add a unit test for applies and idempotent applys to the TPR entries.
The tests in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
In PATCH request rount-tripper we check that the kubectl apply
implementation worked as expected.

References #40841
2017-02-27 10:22:12 -08:00
Jordan Liggitt 4592c47ad4
Output result of apply operation 2017-02-27 09:28:28 -05:00
Jordan Liggitt 56d141851f
Honor output formats in kubectl patch 2017-02-27 09:20:49 -05:00
Maciej Szulik 5472a5e0a5 Allow getting logs directly from deployment, job and statefulset 2017-02-27 13:13:09 +01:00
Maciej Szulik 27259358cb Switch ClientAccessFactory to use clientset.Interface rather than actual type 2017-02-27 13:13:06 +01:00
Łukasz Oleś b2d9f99f0c Moved tests and fixed typs 2017-02-27 09:15:56 +01:00
Łukasz Oleś b59ecde587 Implement kubectl rollout status for daemon sets 2017-02-27 09:15:56 +01:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue e6ecfd2e37 Merge pull request #41694 from shiywang/apply-set1
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42044, 41694, 41927, 42050, 41987)

Add apply set-last-applied subcommand 

implement part of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/287, will rebase after https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41699 got merged, EDIT: since bug output format has been confirmed, will update the behavior of output format soon  
cc @kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @AdoHe @pwittrock 

```release-note
Support kubectl apply set-last-applied command to update the applied-applied-configuration annotation
```
2017-02-26 23:16:51 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 082cfac707 Merge pull request #35408 from xilabao/add-secret-to-pflag
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35408, 41915, 41992, 41964, 41925)

add secret option to flag

To resolve the issue of security(pr #35030 ),

> @smarterclayton commented 5 days ago
> This is unfortunately not all flags that could be secrets. The best option would be to add support in spf13/pflag to tag a flag as a secret, and then use that bit to determine the list.
> 
> Also, Command() could be used in contexts that need exact parameters (for subshell execution), so we would need to add a new method or extend the signature here to allow exact flags to be retrieved.

we could add a secret option to the flags.
2017-02-26 18:07:53 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 0bc16d8966 Merge pull request #40576 from nikhiljindal/kubectlcascDel
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41994, 41969, 41997, 40952, 40576)

Updating kubectl to send delete requests with orphanDependents=false if --cascade is true

Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40568 #38897

Updating kubectl to always set `DeleteOptions.orphanDependents=false` when deleting a resource with `--cascade=true`.
This is primarily for federation where we want to use server side cascading deletion.

Impact on kubernetes: kubectl will do another GET after sending a DELETE and wait till the resource is actually deleted. This can have an impact if the resource has a finalizer. kubectl will wait till the finalizer is removed and then the resource is deleted, which is the right thing to do but a notable change in behavior.

cc @caesarxuchao @lavalamp @smarterclayton @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews
2017-02-26 12:58:01 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue c4835f2626 Merge pull request #41864 from marun/kubectl-drain-orphans
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41857, 41864, 40522, 41835, 41991)

kubectl: Allow 'drain --force' to remove orphaned pods

If the managing resource of a given pod (e.g. DaemonSet/ReplicaSet/etc) is deleted (effectively orphaning the pod), and ``kubectl drain --force`` is invoked on the node hosting the pod, the command would fail with an error indicating that the managing resource was not found.  This PR reduces the error to a warning if ``--force`` is specified, allowing nodes with orphaned pods to be drained.   

Reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424678

cc: @derekwaynecarr 

```release-note
Allow drain --force to remove pods whose managing resource is deleted.
```
2017-02-26 11:13:53 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue a1490926d6 Merge pull request #41077 from deads2k/cli-01-cani
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41814, 41922, 41957, 41406, 41077)

add kubectl can-i to see if you can perform an action

Adds `kubectl auth can-i <verb> <resource> [<name>]` so that a user can see if they are allowed to perform an action.

@kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @fabianofranz 

This particular command satisfies the immediate need of knowing if you can perform an action without trying that action.  When using RBAC in a script that is adding permissions, there is a lag between adding the permission and the permission being realized in the RBAC cache.  As a user on the CLI, you almost never see it, but as a script adding a binding and then using that new power, you hit it quite often.

There are natural follow-ons to the same area (hence the `auth` subcommand) to figure out if someone else can perform an action, what actions you can perform in total, and who can perform a given action.  Someone else is an API we have already, what-can-i-do was a proposed API a while back and a very useful one for interfaces, and who-can is common question if someone is administering a namespace.
2017-02-26 10:22:54 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 5c3791b9e0 Merge pull request #41729 from smarterclayton/refactor_printers
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41621, 41946, 41941, 41250, 41729)

Refactor printers and describers into their own package.

This sets the stage for using printer code from the server side (decoupled from kubectl) and loosens the coupling between kubectl and the printers. `pkg/printers` contains interfaces and has an import restriction against pulling in API specific code, while `pkg/printers/internalversion` can be used for internal types.

Add a method on `Factory` for retrieving PrinterForCommand which uses the Scheme and RESTMapper from the Factory, not the hardcoded ones.  This further separates kubectl from the core API scheme and allows better composition.

Change NamePrinter to use RESTMapper (previously it was hardcoding those conversions). This means that we now return plural resource names (`pods/foo`) but is correct once aliases and shortnames start being returned by the mapper.

This is a prerequisite for server side get, but is pure refactor (contains no new features).

@deads2k @liggitt
2017-02-26 06:47:03 -08:00
Justin Santa Barbara 72afd143c4 kubectl drain: make code reusable
DrainOptions requires a few fields to be set, and the expectation is
that these are set as part of construction of the object.  If they are
set, then the drain code can be reused in other kubernetes projects.

This does not create a contract that DrainOptions should fulfill going
forwards, any more than any of the other types that happen to be exposed
are part of the contract.  Instead, this merely makes use outside the
package possible.
2017-02-26 00:48:48 -05:00
Jordan Liggitt 41c88e0455
Revert "Merge pull request #40088 from jsafrane/storage-ga-v1"
This reverts commit 5984607cb9, reversing
changes made to 067f92e789.
2017-02-25 22:35:15 -05:00
xilabao 131802a5cd add secret flag to options 2017-02-25 23:40:50 +08:00
Kazuki Suda 4da41ca56c Support --context flag completion for kubectl 2017-02-25 23:54:56 +09:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 5984607cb9 Merge pull request #40088 from jsafrane/storage-ga-v1
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41854, 41801, 40088, 41590, 41911)

Add storage.k8s.io/v1 API

v1 API is direct copy of v1beta1 API. This v1 API gets installed and exposed in this PR, I tested that kubectl can create both v1beta1 and v1 StorageClass.

~~Rest of Kubernetes (controllers, examples,. tests, ...) still use v1beta1 API, I will update it when this PR gets merged as these changes would get lost among generated code.~~ Most parts use v1 API now, it would not compile / run tests without it.

**Release note**:
```
Kubernetes API storage.k8s.io for storage objects is now fully supported and is available as storage.k8s.io/v1. Beta version of the API storage.k8s.io/v1beta1 is still available in this release, however it will be removed in a future Kubernetes release.

Together with the API endpoint, StorageClass annotation "storageclass.beta.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" is deprecated and  "storageclass.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" should be used instead to mark a default storage class. The beta annotation is still working in this release, however it won't be supported in the next one.
```

@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
2017-02-25 05:02:55 -08:00
elipapa 136c90a7bf solving unknown file attribute error while sourcing completions
sourcing the file with `zsh` > 4 resulted in an `unknown file attribute`.
More details at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37220495/zsh-unknown-file-attribute

replacing $@ with $* for get_comp_words
as suggested by @sttts worked to resolve the issue
2017-02-24 16:29:41 +00:00