Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49081, 49318, 49219, 48989, 48486)
Use MetricsStatsFs to expose RBD volume plugin metrics.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We need to monitor RBD volume usage of our cluster and configure alerts if RBD volume is nearly full. Users of cluster also need to see usage history graph on Grafana.
This PR use MetricsStatsFs to implement MetricsProvider interface of RBD plugin (same as `gce_pd`), so kubelet /stat/summary can expose RBD volume stats.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
cc @rootfs
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47357, 49514, 49271, 49572, 49476)
set default adminid for rbd deleter if unset
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#49225
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @BastiPaeltz @sjenning
**Release note**:
```release-note
set default adminid for rbd deleter if unset
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48911, 49475, 49438, 49362, 49274)
set RBD default values as constant vars
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When working on #49225, I found some [default RBD parameters](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/persistent-volumes/#ceph-rbd) had not been declared as constant values, which will be error-prone.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
set RBD default values as constant vars
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45345, 49470, 49407, 49448, 49486)
Support "fstype" parameter in dynamically provisioned PVs
This PR is a replacement for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40805. I was not able to push fixes and rebases to the original branch as I don't have access to the Github organization anymore.
I assume the PR will need a new "ok to test"
**ORIGINAL PR DESCRIPTION**
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR allows specifying the desired FSType when dynamically provisioning volumes with storage classes. The FSType can now be set as a parameter:
```yaml
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1beta1
metadata:
name: test
provisioner: kubernetes.io/azure-disk
parameters:
fstype: xfs
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#37801
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The PR also implicitly adds checks for unsupported parameters.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Support specifying of FSType in StorageClass
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Improve the warning message if the rbd command is not found.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The previous warning msg is not correct if there is no rbd cmd.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
storageclass ceph add imageformat parameter
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add a imageformat parameter for StorageClass(ceph rbd)
k8s hard coded ceph imageformat 1, according to [ceph manual](http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/man/8/rbd/), imageformat 1 was deprecated, we should add an extra ceph parameter to set ceph rbd imageformat. Ceph rbd imageformat can only be 1 or 2, set the default value to 1.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Allow StorageClass Ceph RBD to specify image format and image features.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47084, 46016, 46372)
Warn, instead of failing, if 'modprobe rbd' fails
Modprobe is a kernel operation that should only be done once to load the
RBD module. The admin could've done this on the Kubernetes nodes. The
RBD plugin can still try to load the module but it shouldnt fail the
workflow if it doesnt succeed.
Partially addresses #45190
Modprobe is a kernel operation that should only be done once to load the
RBD module. The admin could've done this on the Kubernetes nodes. The
RBD plugin can still try to load the module but it shouldnt fail the
workflow if it doesnt succeed.
Partially addresses #45190
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/volume
cc @jsafrane @spothanis @agonzalezro @justinsb @johscheuer @simonswine @nelcy @pmorie @quofelix @sdminonne @thockin @saad-ali @rootfs
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Jan Safranek