Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48043, 48200, 49139, 36238, 49130)
Implement equivalence cache by caching and re-using predicate result
The last part of #30844, I opened a new PR instead of overwrite the old one because we changed some basic assumption by allowing invalidating equivalence cache item by individual predicate.
The idea of this PR is based on discussion in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/32024
- [x] Pods belong to same controllerRef considered to be equivalent
- [x] ` podFitsOnNode` will use cached predicate result if it's available
- [x] Equivalence cache will be updated when if a fresh new predicate is done
- [x] `factory.go` will invalid specific predicate cache(s) based on the object change
- [x] Since `schedule` and `bind` are async, we need to optimistically invalid affected cache(s) before `bind`
- [x] Fully unit test of affected files
- [x] e2e test to verify cache update/invalid workflow
- [x] performance test results
- [x] Some nits fixes related but expected to result in `needs-rebase` so they are split to: #36060#35968#37512
cc @wojtek-t @davidopp
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49055, 49128, 49132, 49134, 49110)
Remove affinity annotations leftover
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is a further cleanup for affinity annotations, following #47869.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
ref: #47869
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
- I remove the commented test cases and just leave TODOs instead. I think converting these untestable test cases for now is not necessary. We can add new test cases in future.
- I remove the e2e test case `validates that embedding the JSON PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity setting as a string in the annotation value work` because we have a test case `validates that InterPod Affinity and AntiAffinity is respected if matching` to test the same thing.
/cc @aveshagarwal @bsalamat @gyliu513 @k82cn @timothysc
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47417, 47638, 46930)
Added scheduler integration test owners.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add OWNER file into scheduler integration test.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes # N/A
**Release note**:
```release-note-none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Delete unused return
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We do not use the function return, it's better not to write the return.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45610, 47628)
Replace capacity with allocatable to calculate pod resource
It is not accurate to use capacity to do the calculation.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The currently cpu resource calculation for a pod in end2end test is incorrect.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
fixes#47627
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
More details about capacity and allocatable:
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/node-allocatable.md
**Release note**:
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47883, 47179, 46966, 47982, 47945)
Remove e2e test for least requested prioirty function
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Deletes a flaky e2e test for "least requested" priority function of the scheduler. This priority function is tested more extensively in our unit tests.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#47769
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Quentin MACHU