Automatic merge from submit-queue
clean up generic apiserver options
Clean up generic apiserver options before we tag any levels. This makes them more in-line with "normal" api servers running on the platform.
Also remove dead example code.
@sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41937, 41151, 42092, 40269, 42135)
[Federation] ReplicaSet e2es should let the API server to generate the names to avoid collision while running tests in parallel.
cc @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41937, 41151, 42092, 40269, 42135)
Add a unit test for idempotent applys to the TPR entries.
The test in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
The apply operation expects a last-modified-configuration annotation.
That is written verbatim in the test/fixture file.
References #40841
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds one unit test for TPR's using applies.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
References:
https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/95https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40841#issue-204769102
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I am not super proud of the tpr-entry name.
But I feel like we need to call the two objects differently.
The one which has Kind:ThirdPartyResource
and the one has Kind:Foo.
Is the name "ThirdPartyResource" used interchangeably for both ? I used tpr-entry for the Kind:Foo object.
Also I !assume! this is testing an idempotent apply because the last-applied-configuration annotation is the same as the object itself.
This is the state I see in the logs of kubectl if I do a proper idempotent apply of a third party resource entry.
I guess I will know more once I start playing around with apply command that change TPR objects.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41234, 42186, 41615, 42028, 41788)
Additional upgrade e2e tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Add basic upgrade tests for DaemonSet and Job, and add "during upgrade" testing to ConfigMap test. Add a simple harness for testing upgrade tests.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**: continuation of #41296 @krousey please review, thanks
**Release note**: `NONE`
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Enforce Node Allocatable via cgroups
This PR enforces node allocatable across all pods using a top level cgroup as described in https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/348
This PR also provides an option to enforce `kubeReserved` and `systemReserved` on user specified cgroups.
This PR will by default make kubelet create top level cgroups even if `kubeReserved` and `systemReserved` is not specified and hence `Allocatable = Capacity`.
```release-note
New Kubelet flag `--enforce-node-allocatable` with a default value of `pods` is added which will make kubelet create a top level cgroup for all pods to enforce Node Allocatable. Optionally, `system-reserved` & `kube-reserved` values can also be specified separated by comma to enforce node allocatable on cgroups specified via `--system-reserved-cgroup` & `--kube-reserved-cgroup` respectively. Note the default value of the latter flags are "".
This feature requires a **Node Drain** prior to upgrade failing which pods will be restarted if possible or terminated if they have a `RestartNever` policy.
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-node-feature-requests
TODO:
- [x] Adjust effective Node Allocatable to subtract hard eviction thresholds
- [x] Add unit tests
- [x] Complete pending e2e tests
- [x] Manual testing
- [x] Get the proposal merged
@dashpole is working on adding support for evictions for enforcing Node allocatable more gracefully. That work will show up in a subsequent PR for v1.6
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41205, 42196, 42068, 41588, 41271)
Implements an upgrade test for Job
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR implements a cluster upgrade test for Job. Some functionality for Job testing has been moved from the e2e package to the framework package to facilitate code reuse between the e2e package and the upgrade package without introducing cyclic dependencies.
We need this PR to help automate the testing of cluster upgrades between versions.
**Release note**
```release-note
NONE
```
The tests in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
In PATCH request rount-tripper we check that the kubectl apply
implementation worked as expected.
References #40841
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41116, 41804, 42104, 42111, 42120)
make kubectl taint command respect effect NoExecute
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Part of feature forgiveness implementation, make kubectl taint command respect effect NoExecute.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Related Issue: #1574
Related PR: #39469
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
make kubectl taint command respect effect NoExecute
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41962, 42055, 42062, 42019, 42054)
Update flag to --check-version-skew instead of --check_version_skew
https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/2012
Also add a `--` to send the flags to kubetest without triggering a warning.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41962, 42055, 42062, 42019, 42054)
PV upgrade test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds a PV upgrade test to the new upgrade test framework. Before, this test had to be done manually. Currently the upgrade test framework only works on the GCE environment, so I plan to add support for other providers later. In order to write the test, I had to modify and refactor some volume test util libraries. I reran the impacted tests to make sure they still passed.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
It's probably easier to review the two commits separately. I split it up into the refactor changes, and the upgrade test changes.
**Release note**:
NONE
cc @saad-ali @krousey
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42044, 41694, 41927, 42050, 41987)
Use existing nginx image in the node
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fixes a test flake: `[k8s.io] Garbage collector should orphan pods created by rc if delete options say so`
**Which issue this PR fixes**
fixes#35771
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42044, 41694, 41927, 42050, 41987)
Add apply set-last-applied subcommand
implement part of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/287, will rebase after https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41699 got merged, EDIT: since bug output format has been confirmed, will update the behavior of output format soon
cc @kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @AdoHe @pwittrock
```release-note
Support kubectl apply set-last-applied command to update the applied-applied-configuration annotation
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35408, 41915, 41992, 41964, 41925)
e2e/upgrade: add sysctls
Add sysctl upgrade tests.
How can these be effectively tested?
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41954, 40528, 41875, 41165, 41877)
Updating apiserver to return 202 when resource is being deleted asynchronously via cascading deletion
As per https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/33196#issuecomment-278440622.
cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews @smarterclayton @caesarxuchao @bgrant0607 @kubernetes/api-reviewers
```release-note
Updating apiserver to return http status code 202 for a delete request when the resource is not immediately deleted because of user requesting cascading deletion using DeleteOptions.OrphanDependents=false.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41701, 41818, 41897, 41119, 41562)
Optimization of on-wire information sent to scheduler extender interfaces that are stateful
The changes are to address the issue described in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40991
```release-note
Added support to minimize sending verbose node information to scheduler extender by sending only node names and expecting extenders to cache the rest of the node information
```
cc @ravigadde
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41994, 41969, 41997, 40952, 40576)
Guaranteed admission for Critical Pods
This is the first step in implementing node-level preemption for critical pods.
It defines the AdmissionFailureHandler interface, which allows callers, like the kubelet, to define how failed predicates are handled, and take steps to correct failures if necessary.
In the kubelet's implementation, it triggers preemption if the pod being admitted is critical, and if the only failed predicates are InsufficientResourceErrors, then it prempts (not yet implemented) other other pods to allow admission of the critical pod.
cc: @vishh
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41994, 41969, 41997, 40952, 40576)
Inode Eviction test Tests that Innocent pods are not evicted throughout test.
The current version of the inode eviction test only makes sure that the two abusive pods are evicted before the innocent pod. This change adds a check during the post-eviction monitoring period to ensure that the innocent pod is not evicted, even after the abusive pods.
This will likely result in a higher failure rate for this test, but since it is in the flaky test suite, this is not an issue.
This change should help give us a better perspective on eviction issues.
cc @Random-Liu @vishh @derekwaynecarr
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40932, 41896, 41815, 41309, 41628)
Modify CronJob API to add job history limits, cleanup jobs in controller
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As discussed in #34710: this adds two limits to `CronJobSpec`, to limit the number of finished jobs created by a CronJob to keep.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#34710
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
cc @soltysh, please have a look and let me know what you think -- I'll then add end to end testing and update the doc in a separate commit. What is the timeline to get this into 1.6?
The plan:
- [x] API changes
- [x] Changing versioned APIs
- [x] `types.go`
- [x] `defaults.go` (nothing to do)
- [x] `conversion.go` (nothing to do?)
- [x] `conversion_test.go` (nothing to do?)
- [x] Changing the internal structure
- [x] `types.go`
- [x] `validation.go`
- [x] `validation_test.go`
- [x] Edit version conversions
- [x] Edit (nothing to do?)
- [x] Run `hack/update-codegen.sh`
- [x] Generate protobuf objects
- [x] Run `hack/update-generated-protobuf.sh`
- [x] Generate json (un)marshaling code
- [x] Run `hack/update-codecgen.sh`
- [x] Update fuzzer
- [x] Actual logic
- [x] Unit tests
- [x] End to end tests
- [x] Documentation changes and API specs update in separate commit
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add configurable limits to CronJob resource to specify how many successful and failed jobs are preserved.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42106, 42094, 42069, 42098, 41852)
Pod deletion observation is flaking, increase timeout and debug more
We can afford to wait longer than 30 seconds, and we should be printing
more error and output information about the cause of the failure.
Fixes / triages #41902
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42106, 42094, 42069, 42098, 41852)
Add ncdc to test/OWNERS
**What this PR does / why we need it**: add me to test/OWNERS
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-testing-pr-reviews @smarterclayton @bgrant0607
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41854, 41801, 40088, 41590, 41911)
Add storage.k8s.io/v1 API
v1 API is direct copy of v1beta1 API. This v1 API gets installed and exposed in this PR, I tested that kubectl can create both v1beta1 and v1 StorageClass.
~~Rest of Kubernetes (controllers, examples,. tests, ...) still use v1beta1 API, I will update it when this PR gets merged as these changes would get lost among generated code.~~ Most parts use v1 API now, it would not compile / run tests without it.
**Release note**:
```
Kubernetes API storage.k8s.io for storage objects is now fully supported and is available as storage.k8s.io/v1. Beta version of the API storage.k8s.io/v1beta1 is still available in this release, however it will be removed in a future Kubernetes release.
Together with the API endpoint, StorageClass annotation "storageclass.beta.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" is deprecated and "storageclass.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" should be used instead to mark a default storage class. The beta annotation is still working in this release, however it won't be supported in the next one.
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Supports 'ensure exist' class addon in Addon-manager
Fixes#39561, fixes#37047 and fixes#36411. Depends on #40057.
This PR splits cluster addons into two categories:
- Reconcile: Addons that need to be reconciled (`kube-dns` for instance).
- EnsureExists: Addons that need to be exist but changeable (`default-storage-class`).
The behavior for the 'EnsureExists' class addon would be:
- Create it if not exist.
- Users could do any modification they want, addon-manager will not reconcile it.
- If it is deleted, addon-manager will recreate it with the given template.
- It will not be updated/clobbered during upgrade.
As Brian pointed out in [#37048/comment](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37048#issuecomment-272510835), this may not be the best solution for addon-manager. Though #39561 needs to be fixed in 1.6 and we might not have enough bandwidth to do a big surgery.
@mikedanese @thockin
cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-misc
---
Tasks for this PR:
- [x] Supports 'ensure exist' class addon and switch to use new labels in addon-manager.
- [x] Updates READMEs regarding the new behavior of addon-manager.
- [x] Updated `test/e2e/addon_update.go` to match the new behavior.
- [x] Go through all current addons and apply the new labels on them regarding what they need.
- [x] Bump addon-manager and update its template files.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41714, 41510, 42052, 41918, 31515)
Switch scheduler to use generated listers/informers
Where possible, switch the scheduler to use generated listers and
informers. There are still some places where it probably makes more
sense to use one-off reflectors/informers (listing/watching just a
single node, listing/watching scheduled & unscheduled pods using a field
selector).
I think this can wait until master is open for 1.7 pulls, given that we're close to the 1.6 freeze.
After this and #41482 go in, the only code left that references legacylisters will be federation, and 1 bit in a stateful set unit test (which I'll clean up in a follow-up).
@resouer I imagine this will conflict with your equivalence class work, so one of us will be doing some rebasing 😄
cc @wojtek-t @gmarek @timothysc @jayunit100 @smarterclayton @deads2k @liggitt @sttts @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
deads2k