Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Rename Detach() parameter.
`Detach()` does not get device name, it gets volume name. Parameters named `deviceMountPath` or `deviceName` just confuses developers.
Note that this PR just renames parameters here and there, there should be no behavior change.
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
/assign @gnufied @jingxu97
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Update volume OWNERS to reflect active sig-storage reviewers
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Update sig-storage reviewers to add new members and remove those that don't have as much time to review storage PRs. Approvers are unchanged.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
For all those that have been removed, please approve. If you want to remain as a reviewer, let me know and I will add you back.
**Release note**:
NONE
This change is prerequisite for implementing iSCSI attacher
and detacher.
In order to use chap authentication at iSCSI plugin after
implementing attacher and detacher, secret is needed at
AttachDisk() which is called from WaitForAttach().
To obtain secret, pod information is required, but
WaitForAttach() doesn't pass pod information inside.
This patch adds 'pod' as an argument of WaitForAttach()
and adds changes to drivers who implements WaitForAttach().
Fixes#48953
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46458, 50934, 50766, 50970, 47698)
Prepare VolumeHost for running mount tools in containers
This is the first part of implementation of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/278 - running mount utilities in containers.
It updates `VolumeHost` interface:
* `GetMounter()` now requires volume plugin name, as it is going to return different mounter to different volume plugings, because mount utilities for these plugins can be on different places.
* New `GetExec()` method that should volume plugins use to execute any utilities. This new `Exec` interface will execute them on proper place.
* `SafeFormatAndMount` is updated to the new `Exec` interface.
This is just a preparation, `GetExec` right now leads to simple `os.Exec` and mount utilities are executed on the same place as before. Also, the volume plugins will be updated in subsequent PRs (split into separate PRs, some plugins required lot of changes).
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
@rootfs @gnufied
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50626, 50683, 50679, 50684, 50460)
Specify node labels for fakeVolumeHost
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds ability to set arbitrary node labels to type `fakeVolumeHost`.
Allows creation of tests of code that depends on reading node labels using `fakeVolumeHost.GetNodeLabels() `.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46076, 43879, 44897, 46556, 46654)
Local storage plugin
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Volume plugin implementation for local persistent volumes. Scheduler predicate will direct already-bound PVCs to the node that the local PV is at. PVC binding still happens independently.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
Part of #43640
**Release note**:
```
Alpha feature: Local volume plugin allows local directories to be created and consumed as a Persistent Volume. These volumes have node affinity and pods will only be scheduled to the node that the volume is at.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42369, 42375, 42397, 42435, 42455)
[Bug Fix]: Avoid evicting more pods than necessary by adding Timestamps for fsstats and ignoring stale stats
Continuation of #33121. Credit for most of this goes to @sjenning. I added volume fs timestamps.
**why is this a bug**
This PR attempts to fix part of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/31362 which results in multiple pods getting evicted unnecessarily whenever the node runs into resource pressure. This PR reduces the chances of such disruptions by avoiding reacting to old/stale metrics.
Without this PR, kubernetes nodes under resource pressure will cause unnecessary disruptions to user workloads.
This PR will also help deflake a node e2e test suite.
The eviction manager currently avoids evicting pods if metrics are old. However, timestamp data is not available for filesystem data, and this causes lots of extra evictions.
See the [inode eviction test flakes](https://k8s-testgrid.appspot.com/google-node#kubelet-flaky-gce-e2e) for examples.
This should probably be treated as a bugfix, as it should help mitigate extra evictions.
cc: @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews @vishh @derekwaynecarr @sjenning
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37228, 40146, 40075, 38789, 40189)
Cleanup temp dirs
So funny story my /tmp ran out of space running the unit tests so I am cleaning up all the temp dirs we create.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/volume
cc @jsafrane @spothanis @agonzalezro @justinsb @johscheuer @simonswine @nelcy @pmorie @quofelix @sdminonne @thockin @saad-ali @rootfs
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Vladimir Vivien