running (renamed to GetAllCurrentZones). Added E2E test to confirm this
behavior.
Added node informer to cloud-provider controller to keep track of zones
with k8s nodes in them.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Rename Detach() parameter.
`Detach()` does not get device name, it gets volume name. Parameters named `deviceMountPath` or `deviceName` just confuses developers.
Note that this PR just renames parameters here and there, there should be no behavior change.
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
/assign @gnufied @jingxu97
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Update volume OWNERS to reflect active sig-storage reviewers
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Update sig-storage reviewers to add new members and remove those that don't have as much time to review storage PRs. Approvers are unchanged.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
For all those that have been removed, please approve. If you want to remain as a reviewer, let me know and I will add you back.
**Release note**:
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix swallowed errors in various volume packages
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Fixes swallowed errors in various volume packages.
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Modifies the VolumeZonePredicate to handle a PV that belongs to more
then one zone or region. This is indicated by the zone or region label
value containing a comma separated list.
This change is prerequisite for implementing iSCSI attacher
and detacher.
In order to use chap authentication at iSCSI plugin after
implementing attacher and detacher, secret is needed at
AttachDisk() which is called from WaitForAttach().
To obtain secret, pod information is required, but
WaitForAttach() doesn't pass pod information inside.
This patch adds 'pod' as an argument of WaitForAttach()
and adds changes to drivers who implements WaitForAttach().
Fixes#48953
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45345, 49470, 49407, 49448, 49486)
Support "fstype" parameter in dynamically provisioned PVs
This PR is a replacement for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40805. I was not able to push fixes and rebases to the original branch as I don't have access to the Github organization anymore.
I assume the PR will need a new "ok to test"
**ORIGINAL PR DESCRIPTION**
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR allows specifying the desired FSType when dynamically provisioning volumes with storage classes. The FSType can now be set as a parameter:
```yaml
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1beta1
metadata:
name: test
provisioner: kubernetes.io/azure-disk
parameters:
fstype: xfs
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#37801
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The PR also implicitly adds checks for unsupported parameters.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Support specifying of FSType in StorageClass
```
An admin wants to specify in which GCE availability zone(s) users may create persistent volumes using dynamic provisioning.
That's why the admin can now configure in StorageClass object a comma separated list of zones. Dynamically created PVs for PVCs that use the StorageClass are created in one of the configured zones.
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/volume
cc @jsafrane @spothanis @agonzalezro @justinsb @johscheuer @simonswine @nelcy @pmorie @quofelix @sdminonne @thockin @saad-ali @rootfs
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Jeff Grafton