Automatic merge from submit-queue
Enable extensions/v1beta1/NetworkPolicy by default
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/28401
For some reason this also triggered an update to the swagger spec (which apparently hadn't been done before but wasn't failing validation...)
This drives conversion generation from file tags like:
// +conversion-gen=k8s.io/my/internal/version
.. rather than hardcoded lists of packages.
The only net change in generated code can be explained as correct. Previously
it didn't know that conversion was available.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Prep for not checking in generated, part 1/2
This PR is extracted from #25978 - it is just the deep-copy related parts. All the Makefile and conversion stuff is excluded.
@wojtek-t this is literally branched, a bunch of commits deleted, and a very small number of manual fixups applied. If you think this is easier to review (and if it passes CI) you can feel free to go over it again. I will follow this with a conversion-related PR to build on this.
Or if you prefer, just close this and let the mega-PR ride.
@lavalamp
This is the last piece of Clayton's #26179 to be implemented with file tags.
All diffs are accounted for. Followup will use this to streamline some
packages.
Also add some V(5) debugging - it was helpful in diagnosing various issues, it
may be helpful again.
This drives most of the logic of deep-copy generation from tags like:
// +deepcopy-gen=package
..rather than hardcoded lists of packages. This will make it possible to
subsequently generate code ONLY for packages that need it *right now*, rather
than all of them always.
Also remove pkgs that really do not need deep-copies (no symbols used
anywhere).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Represent unversioned.Time correctly in swagger spec
unversioned.Time previously represented as "string" type with no format while the correct representation should also have "date-time" as format. fixes#2968
Automatic merge from submit-queue
delete the redundant word "a"
In file docs/reporting-security-issues.md, line #37, "If you believe you have discovered a vulnerability or a have a security incident to report", here the second "a" is redundant, should be deleted.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
"Mover" should be "Moreover"
In file docs/proposals/apiserver-watch.md, line #108, "Mover, this will not require any changes in other parts of the code.", here "Mover" should be "Moreover".
This commit includes a proposal and a Go file to re-define the container
runtime interface.
Note that this is an experimental interface and is expected to go through
multiple revisions once developers start implementing against it. As stated in
the proposal, there are also individual issues to carry discussions of
specific features.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove comment about empty selectors in the service spec
As discussed, removing the comment about empty selectors in Service specs.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
TLS bootstrap API group (alpha)
This PR only covers the new types and related client/storage code- the vast majority of the line count is codegen. The implementation differs slightly from the current proposal document based on discussions in design thread (#20439). The controller logic and kubelet support mentioned in the proposal are forthcoming in separate requests.
I submit that #18762 ("Creating a new API group is really hard") is, if anything, understating it. I've tried to structure the commits to illustrate the process.
@mikedanese @erictune @smarterclayton @deads2k
```release-note-experimental
An alpha implementation of the the TLS bootstrap API described in docs/proposals/kubelet-tls-bootstrap.md.
```
[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md?pixel)]()
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Dedent
Adding the dedent package and then applying it to the kubectl help commands. Also updating the documentation to reflect the use of dedent.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
to remove workflow proposal
@erictune @brendanburns
I think workflow proposal should be removed now. If you have a specific plan to remove it disregard this.