Recent docs website shuffling during 1.6 caused majority of links in the API
types and fields to break. Since we do not have server-side 301 redirects, user
has to click an extra link and the #target segment in the URL will be lost.
I have manually gone through all of them to bring them up to date and add HTTPS
to those missing it.
Signed-off-by: Ahmet Alp Balkan <ahmetb@google.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove ExportOptions from api/internal and use unversioned
Should only have one internal object in use
Part of #37530
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/api
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Convert single GV and lists of GVs into an interface that can handle
more complex scenarios (everything internal, nothing supported). Pass
the interface down into conversion.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Custom conversions between RCs/RSs
Needed for building storages that still need to work with RCs but also want to facilitate RSs.
cc: @deads2k @smarterclayton @liggitt
There's been enough people broken by not committing generated code, that we
should undo that until we have a proper client that is `go get` compatible.
This is temporary.
This mostly takes the previously checked in files and removes them, and moves
the generation to be on-demand instead of manual. Manually verified no change
in generated output.
This is the last piece of Clayton's #26179 to be implemented with file tags.
All diffs are accounted for. Followup will use this to streamline some
packages.
Also add some V(5) debugging - it was helpful in diagnosing various issues, it
may be helpful again.
This drives most of the logic of deep-copy generation from tags like:
// +deepcopy-gen=package
..rather than hardcoded lists of packages. This will make it possible to
subsequently generate code ONLY for packages that need it *right now*, rather
than all of them always.
Also remove pkgs that really do not need deep-copies (no symbols used
anywhere).
In bringing back Clayton's PR piece-by-piece this was almost as easy to
implement as his version, and is much more like what I think we should be
doing.
Specifically, any time which defines a .DeepCopy() method will have that method
called preferentially. Otherwise we generate our own functions for
deep-copying. This affected exactly one type - resource.Quantity. In applying
this heuristic, several places in the generated code were simplified.
To achieve this I had to convert types.Type.Methods from a slice to a map,
which seems correct anyway (to do by-name lookups).
His PR cam during the middle of this development cycle, and it was easier to
burn it down and recreate it than try to patch it into an existing series and
re-test every assumption. This behavior will be re-introduced in subsequent
commits.
Ahmet Alp Balkan