Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Lift embedded structure out of eviction-related KubeletConfiguration fields
- Changes the following KubeletConfiguration fields from `string` to
`map[string]string`:
- `EvictionHard`
- `EvictionSoft`
- `EvictionSoftGracePeriod`
- `EvictionMinimumReclaim`
- Adds flag parsing shims to maintain Kubelet's public flags API, while
enabling structured input in the file API.
- Also removes `kubeletconfig.ConfigurationMap`, which was an ad-hoc flag
parsing shim living in the kubeletconfig API group, and replaces it
with the `MapStringString` shim introduced in this PR. Flag parsing
shims belong in a common place, not in the kubeletconfig API.
I manually audited these to ensure that this wouldn't cause errors
parsing the command line for syntax that would have previously been
error free (`kubeletconfig.ConfigurationMap` was unique in that it
allowed keys to be provided on the CLI without values. I believe this was
done in `flags.ConfigurationMap` to facilitate the `--node-labels` flag,
which rightfully accepts value-free keys, and that this shim was then
just copied to `kubeletconfig`). Fortunately, the affected fields
(`ExperimentalQOSReserved`, `SystemReserved`, and `KubeReserved`) expect
non-empty strings in the values of the map, and as a result passing the
empty string is already an error. Thus requiring keys shouldn't break
anyone's scripts.
- Updates code and tests accordingly.
Regarding eviction operators, directionality is already implicit in the
signal type (for a given signal, the decision to evict will be made when
crossing the threshold from either above or below, never both). There is
no need to expose an operator, such as `<`, in the API. By changing
`EvictionHard` and `EvictionSoft` to `map[string]string`, this PR
simplifies the experience of working with these fields via the
`KubeletConfiguration` type. Again, flags stay the same.
Other things:
- There is another flag parsing shim, `flags.ConfigurationMap`, from the
shared flag utility. The `NodeLabels` field still uses
`flags.ConfigurationMap`. This PR moves the allocation of the
`map[string]string` for the `NodeLabels` field from
`AddKubeletConfigFlags` to the defaulter for the external
`KubeletConfiguration` type. Flags are layered on top of an internal
object that has undergone conversion from a defaulted external object,
which means that previously the mere registration of flags would have
overwritten any previously-defined defaults for `NodeLabels` (fortunately
there were none).
Related: #53833 (lifting embedded structures out of string fields is part of getting this API to beta)
```release-note
The EvictionHard, EvictionSoft, EvictionSoftGracePeriod, EvictionMinimumReclaim, SystemReserved, and KubeReserved fields in the KubeletConfiguration object (kubeletconfig/v1alpha1) are now of type map[string]string, which facilitates writing JSON and YAML files.
```
- Changes the following KubeletConfiguration fields from `string` to
`map[string]string`:
- `EvictionHard`
- `EvictionSoft`
- `EvictionSoftGracePeriod`
- `EvictionMinimumReclaim`
- Adds flag parsing shims to maintain Kubelet's public flags API, while
enabling structured input in the file API.
- Also removes `kubeletconfig.ConfigurationMap`, which was an ad-hoc flag
parsing shim living in the kubeletconfig API group, and replaces it
with the `MapStringString` shim introduced in this PR. Flag parsing
shims belong in a common place, not in the kubeletconfig API.
I manually audited these to ensure that this wouldn't cause errors
parsing the command line for syntax that would have previously been
error free (`kubeletconfig.ConfigurationMap` was unique in that it
allowed keys to be provided on the CLI without values. I believe this was
done in `flags.ConfigurationMap` to facilitate the `--node-labels` flag,
which rightfully accepts value-free keys, and that this shim was then
just copied to `kubeletconfig`). Fortunately, the affected fields
(`ExperimentalQOSReserved`, `SystemReserved`, and `KubeReserved`) expect
non-empty strings in the values of the map, and as a result passing the
empty string is already an error. Thus requiring keys shouldn't break
anyone's scripts.
- Updates code and tests accordingly.
Regarding eviction operators, directionality is already implicit in the
signal type (for a given signal, the decision to evict will be made when
crossing the threshold from either above or below, never both). There is
no need to expose an operator, such as `<`, in the API. By changing
`EvictionHard` and `EvictionSoft` to `map[string]string`, this PR
simplifies the experience of working with these fields via the
`KubeletConfiguration` type. Again, flags stay the same.
Other things:
- There is another flag parsing shim, `flags.ConfigurationMap`, from the
shared flag utility. The `NodeLabels` field still uses
`flags.ConfigurationMap`. This PR moves the allocation of the
`map[string]string` for the `NodeLabels` field from
`AddKubeletConfigFlags` to the defaulter for the external
`KubeletConfiguration` type. Flags are layered on top of an internal
object that has undergone conversion from a defaulted external object,
which means that previously the mere registration of flags would have
overwritten any previously-defined defaults for `NodeLabels` (fortunately
there were none).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55697, 55631, 51905, 55647, 55826). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add e2e test for mount propagation
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This adds e2e test for mount propagation introduced by #46444.
@kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
/sig node
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55697, 55631, 51905, 55647, 55826). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix failed to access service of e2e test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We should create service before deployments as said in the issue.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes [#55696](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/55696)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55798, 49579, 54862, 55188, 51990). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add special tag for disabling ESIPP and HPA-related tests on large clusters
As discussed offline, this would help improve accountability for tests needing some love from scalability perspective.
/cc @porridge
fyi - @MrHohn @MaciekPytel @mwielgus @crassirostris
@kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Bump addon manager version used to 6.5
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Bump addon manager version to use #55466. This adds leader election-like mechanism to addon manager.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Release note copied from #55466. This is intended to be cherrypicked into 1.7 and 1.8 branches.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Addon manager supports HA masters.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55682, 55444, 55456, 55717, 55131). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add sig storage label to multizone static PV test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds sig storage tag to e2e test so it shows up on our testgrid dashboard
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55764, 55683, 55468, 54409, 55546). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Wait for server resources.
For https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/55768.
In e2e test for containerd, I sometimes see the following fail (e.g. https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-cri-containerd-e2e-gci-gce/178):
```
Nov 15 02:40:31.291: Couldn't delete ns: "e2e-tests-container-probe-dcvlw": unable to retrieve the complete list of server APIs: metrics.k8s.io/v1beta1: the server could not find the requested resource (&discovery.ErrGroupDiscoveryFailed{Groups:map[schema.GroupVersion]error{schema.GroupVersion{Group:"metrics.k8s.io", Version:"v1beta1"}:(*errors.StatusError)(0xc420bfd170)}})
```
Usually, only the first few tests fail with this error. The error seems to be returned at this line https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e/framework/util.go#L1170.
@cheftako @caesarxuchao Does this change make sense to you? Or should I wait for something else to become ready?
/cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add options for mounting SCSI or NVMe local SSD though Block or Filesystem and do all of that with UUID
Fixes: #51431
Mount SCSI local SSD by UUID in /mnt/disks/by-uuid/, also allows for users to request and mount NVMe disks. Both types of disks will be accessable either through block or filesystem
To see code in progress for NVMe and block support see working branch: https://github.com/davidz627/kubernetes/tree/localExt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54436, 53148, 55153, 55614, 55484). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Support multizone clusters in GCE and GKE e2e tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
For multi-zone clusters we can't rely on zone parameter for fetching information on Instance Groups. Instead we first fetch the zone the group is in to use in subsequent calls.
Note that current version of the code does not work for multi zone clusters at all.
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55648, 55274, 54982, 51955, 55639). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Node e2e: add a cloud-init script to disable live-restore in node e2e test
This cloud-init config will be used in tests in https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
/assign @yujuhong
/cc @abgworrall @dchen1107
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55648, 55274, 54982, 51955, 55639). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Swap NetworkPolicy storage to networking.k8s.io/v1
Finishes(?) the NetworkPolicy v1 migration.
Fixes#50604
The integration test passes. I copied the test-update-storage-objects.sh change from #50327 and have no idea if it's right.
/cc @sttts @caesarxuchao @thockin
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53780, 55663, 55321, 52421, 55659). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
remove duplicated import
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53780, 55663, 55321, 52421, 55659). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add hostip and protocol to the hostport predicates
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds "hostIP and protocol" to scheduler hostport predicate procedure
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
fix#51950
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
- [x] basic implementation, need review
- [x] e2e test
- [x] update doc (will be done in seperate PR)
**Release note**:
```release-note
add hostIP and protocol to the original hostport predicates procedure in scheduler.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Introduce new `VolumeAttachment` API Object
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Introduce a new `VolumeAttachment` API Object. This object will be used by the CSI volume plugin to enable external attachers (see design [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/1258). In the future, existing volume plugins can be refactored to use this object as well.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: Part of issue https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/178
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
None
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Introduce the v1alpha1 version to the Kubernetes storage API. And add a
new VolumeAttachment object to that version. This object will initially
be used only by the new CSI Volume Plugin. Eventually existing volume
plugins can be refactored to use it too.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Regional support in Cluster Autoscaler e2e tests.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When calling GKE API and gcloud in Autoscaling e2 tests, take into account that clusters can be regional.
This currently uses MultiZonal as an indicator that cluster is regional, which is suboptimal, but considering that our tests do not work with multizonal clusters at the moment, there is no regression.This should be changed once there is an indicator available that the cluster is regional.
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
E2E test to verify pod failover during node power-off
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds test to verify volume status after the node where the pod got provisioned being powered off and failed over to a different node.
Test performs following tasks:
1. Create a StorageClass
2. Create a PVC with the StorageClass
3. Create a Deployment with 1 replica, using the PVC
4. Verify the pod got provisioned on a node
5. Verify the volume is attached to the node
6. Power off the node where pod got provisioned
7. Verify the pod got provisioned on a different node
8. Verify the volume is attached to the new node
9. Verify the volume is detached from the previous node
10. Power on the previous node
11. Delete the Deployment
12. Delete the PVC
13. Delete the StorageClass
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes https://github.com/vmware/kubernetes/issues/272
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Test logs:
```
# go run hack/e2e.go --check-version-skew=false --v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Node\sPoweroff'
flag provided but not defined: -check-version-skew
Usage of /tmp/go-build212295472/command-line-arguments/_obj/exe/e2e:
-get
go get -u kubetest if old or not installed (default true)
-old duration
Consider kubetest old if it exceeds this (default 24h0m0s)
2017/10/24 11:48:28 e2e.go:55: NOTICE: go run hack/e2e.go is now a shim for test-infra/kubetest
2017/10/24 11:48:28 e2e.go:56: Usage: go run hack/e2e.go [--get=true] [--old=24h0m0s] -- [KUBETEST_ARGS]
2017/10/24 11:48:28 e2e.go:57: The separator is required to use --get or --old flags
2017/10/24 11:48:28 e2e.go:58: The -- flag separator also suppresses this message
2017/10/24 11:48:28 e2e.go:77: Calling kubetest --check-version-skew=false --v --test --test_args=--ginkgo.focus=Node\sPoweroff...
2017/10/24 11:48:28 util.go:154: Running: ./cluster/kubectl.sh --match-server-version=false version
2017/10/24 11:48:28 util.go:156: Step './cluster/kubectl.sh --match-server-version=false version' finished in 350.700421ms
2017/10/24 11:48:28 util.go:154: Running: ./hack/e2e-internal/e2e-status.sh
Skeleton Provider: prepare-e2e not implemented
Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"9+", GitVersion:"v1.9.0-alpha.1.1627+54fc02df4a3a2a", GitCommit:"54fc02df4a3a2a12e14fb72d84a1aaa658ba6689", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2017-10-24T18:33:37Z", GoVersion:"go1.8.3", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"9+", GitVersion:"v1.9.0-alpha.1.1437+ba66fcb63de9e9", GitCommit:"ba66fcb63de9e9b72e2ccf8b823df33a22df0522", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2017-10-20T07:16:05Z", GoVersion:"go1.9.1", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
2017/10/24 11:48:28 util.go:156: Step './hack/e2e-internal/e2e-status.sh' finished in 315.334518ms
2017/10/24 11:48:28 util.go:154: Running: ./hack/ginkgo-e2e.sh --ginkgo.focus=Node\sPoweroff
Conformance test: not doing test setup.
Oct 24 11:48:30.391: INFO: Overriding default scale value of zero to 1
Oct 24 11:48:30.391: INFO: Overriding default milliseconds value of zero to 5000
I1024 11:48:30.637436 409 e2e.go:378] Starting e2e run "ed9fdfc7-b8eb-11e7-a595-0050569c26b8" on Ginkgo node 1
Running Suite: Kubernetes e2e suite
===================================
Random Seed: 1508870909 - Will randomize all specs
Will run 1 of 717 specs
Oct 24 11:48:30.678: INFO: >>> kubeConfig: /root/.kube/config
Oct 24 11:48:30.685: INFO: Waiting up to 4h0m0s for all (but 0) nodes to be schedulable
Oct 24 11:48:30.719: INFO: Waiting up to 10m0s for all pods (need at least 0) in namespace 'kube-system' to be running and ready
Oct 24 11:48:30.857: INFO: 17 / 17 pods in namespace 'kube-system' are running and ready (0 seconds elapsed)
Oct 24 11:48:30.857: INFO: expected 4 pod replicas in namespace 'kube-system', 4 are Running and Ready.
Oct 24 11:48:30.863: INFO: Waiting for pods to enter Success, but no pods in "kube-system" match label map[name:e2e-image-puller]
Oct 24 11:48:30.863: INFO: Dumping network health container logs from all nodes...
Oct 24 11:48:30.877: INFO: Client version: v1.9.0-alpha.1.1627+54fc02df4a3a2a
Oct 24 11:48:30.879: INFO: Server version: v1.9.0-alpha.1.1437+ba66fcb63de9e9
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
------------------------------
[sig-storage] Node Poweroff [Feature:vsphere] [Slow] [Disruptive]
verify volume status after node power off
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/vsphere_volume_node_poweroff.go:149
[BeforeEach] [sig-storage] Node Poweroff [Feature:vsphere] [Slow] [Disruptive]
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:133
STEP: Creating a kubernetes client
Oct 24 11:48:30.885: INFO: >>> kubeConfig: /root/.kube/config
STEP: Building a namespace api object
STEP: Waiting for a default service account to be provisioned in namespace
[BeforeEach] [sig-storage] Node Poweroff [Feature:vsphere] [Slow] [Disruptive]
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/vsphere_volume_node_poweroff.go:64
Oct 24 11:48:30.984: INFO: Waiting up to 4h0m0s for all (but 0) nodes to be schedulable
[It] verify volume status after node power off
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/vsphere_volume_node_poweroff.go:149
STEP: Creating a Storage Class
STEP: Creating PVC using the Storage Class
STEP: Waiting for PVC to be in bound phase
Oct 24 11:48:31.141: INFO: Waiting up to 5m0s for PersistentVolumeClaim pvc-zxz56 to have phase Bound
Oct 24 11:48:31.150: INFO: PersistentVolumeClaim pvc-zxz56 found but phase is Pending instead of Bound.
Oct 24 11:48:33.155: INFO: PersistentVolumeClaim pvc-zxz56 found and phase=Bound (2.013403698s)
STEP: Creating a Deployment
I1024 11:48:33.180161 409 deployment_util.go:254] Waiting deployment "deployment-ef6b820e-b8eb-11e7-a595-0050569c26b8" to complete
Oct 24 11:48:33.192: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:0, Replicas:0, UpdatedReplicas:0, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:0, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition(nil), CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
Oct 24 11:48:35.197: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasAvailable", Message:"Deployment has minimum availability."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
Oct 24 11:48:37.197: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasAvailable", Message:"Deployment has minimum availability."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
Oct 24 11:48:39.196: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasAvailable", Message:"Deployment has minimum availability."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
Oct 24 11:48:41.197: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasAvailable", Message:"Deployment has minimum availability."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
Oct 24 11:48:43.197: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasAvailable", Message:"Deployment has minimum availability."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
Oct 24 11:48:45.197: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasAvailable", Message:"Deployment has minimum availability."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
Oct 24 11:48:47.198: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasAvailable", Message:"Deployment has minimum availability."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
Oct 24 11:48:49.198: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasAvailable", Message:"Deployment has minimum availability."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
Oct 24 11:48:51.196: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasAvailable", Message:"Deployment has minimum availability."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
Oct 24 11:48:53.197: INFO: deployment status: v1beta1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{v1beta1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:63644467713, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(0x5db10c0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasAvailable", Message:"Deployment has minimum availability."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
STEP: Get pod from the deployement
STEP: Verify disk is attached to the node: kubernetes-node5
STEP: Power off the node: kubernetes-node5
Oct 24 11:49:07.337: INFO: Waiting for pod to be failed over from "kubernetes-node5"
Oct 24 11:49:17.336: INFO: Waiting for pod to be failed over from "kubernetes-node5"
Oct 24 11:49:27.340: INFO: Waiting for pod to be failed over from "kubernetes-node5"
Oct 24 11:49:37.340: INFO: The pod has been failed over from "kubernetes-node5" to "kubernetes-node7"
STEP: Waiting for disk to be attached to the new node: kubernetes-node7
Oct 24 11:49:47.534: INFO: Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" has successfully attached to "kubernetes-node7".
STEP: Waiting for disk to be detached from the previous node: kubernetes-node5
Oct 24 11:49:57.707: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:50:07.702: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:50:17.710: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:50:27.733: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:50:37.713: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:50:47.723: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:50:57.705: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:51:07.710: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:51:17.719: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:51:27.716: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:51:37.717: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:51:47.712: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:51:57.707: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:52:07.724: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:52:17.716: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:52:27.711: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:52:37.716: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:52:47.709: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:52:57.714: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:53:07.715: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:53:17.711: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:53:27.714: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:53:37.713: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:53:47.705: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:53:57.711: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:54:07.712: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:54:17.705: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:54:27.712: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:54:37.707: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:54:47.698: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:54:57.705: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:55:07.711: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:55:17.699: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:55:27.702: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:55:37.704: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node5".
Oct 24 11:55:47.703: INFO: Volume "[vsanDatastore] 165fee59-08d0-b42e-e5c4-020047ab7bb1/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-ee347cf2-b8eb-11e7-8558-005056a2ed7b.vmdk" has successfully detached from "kubernetes-node5".
STEP: Power on the previous node: kubernetes-node5
Oct 24 11:55:49.168: INFO: Deleting PersistentVolumeClaim "pvc-zxz56"
[AfterEach] [sig-storage] Node Poweroff [Feature:vsphere] [Slow] [Disruptive]
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:134
Oct 24 11:55:49.253: INFO: Waiting up to 3m0s for all (but 0) nodes to be ready
STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-tests-node-poweroff-l245b" for this suite.
Oct 24 11:55:57.630: INFO: namespace: e2e-tests-node-poweroff-l245b, resource: bindings, ignored listing per whitelist
Oct 24 11:55:57.643: INFO: namespace e2e-tests-node-poweroff-l245b deletion completed in 8.379395732s
• [SLOW TEST:446.758 seconds]
[sig-storage] Node Poweroff [Feature:vsphere] [Slow] [Disruptive]
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/framework.go:22
verify volume status after node power off
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/vsphere_volume_node_poweroff.go:149
------------------------------
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSOct 24 11:55:57.647: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on all node
Oct 24 11:55:57.647: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on node 1
Ran 1 of 717 Specs in 446.969 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 716 Skipped PASS
Ginkgo ran 1 suite in 7m27.797177022s
Test Suite Passed
2017/10/24 11:55:57 util.go:156: Step './hack/ginkgo-e2e.sh --ginkgo.focus=Node\sPoweroff' finished in 7m28.760818768s
2017/10/24 11:55:57 e2e.go:81: Done
```
VMware Reviewers: @divyenpatel @pshahzeb
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55009, 55532, 55601, 52569, 55533). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Webhook e2e test: PUT and PATCH operations
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/492
**Special notes for your reviewer**: ~depends on #55127~ (merged)
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-api-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55009, 55532, 55601, 52569, 55533). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Validate that PV capacity and PVC capacity requests are positive, greater than 0
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Zero (0) capacity PVs cause related pods to fail, and zero (0) capacity PVCs create zero (0) capacity PVs.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** :
Fixes#55553
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Validate positive capacity for PVs and PVCs.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55009, 55532, 55601, 52569, 55533). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add empty dir and host related conformance annotations
Signed-off-by: Brad Topol <btopol@us.ibm.com>
Add empty dir and host related conformance annotations
/sig testing
/area conformance
@sig-testing-pr-reviews
This PR adds pod related conformance annotations to the e2e test suite.
The PR fixes a portion of #53822. It focuses on adding conformance annotations as defined by the Kubernetes Conformance Workgroup for a subset of the empty dir and host based e2e conformance tests.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WWSOqFaG35VmmPOYbwetapj1VPOVMqjZfR9ih5To5gk/edit#gid=62929400
for the list of SIG Arch approved test names and descriptions that I am using.
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Extend test/e2e/scheduling/nvidia-gpus.go to track resource usage of
installer and device plugin containers.
To support this, exports certain functions and fields in
framework/resource_usage_gatherer.go so that it can be used in any
e2e test to track any specified pod resource usage with the specified
probe interval and duration.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We need to quantify the resource usage of the device plugin DaemonSet to make sure it can run reliably on nodes with GPUs.
We also want to measure gpu driver installer resource usage to track any unexpected resource consumption during driver installation.
For the later part, see a related issue https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/368.
Example resource summary output:
Oct 6 12:35:07.289: INFO: Printing summary: ResourceUsageSummary
Oct 6 12:35:07.289: INFO: ResourceUsageSummary JSON
{
"100": [
{
"Name": "nvidia-device-plugin-6kqxp/nvidia-device-plugin",
"Cpu": 0.000507167,
"Mem": 2134016
},
{
"Name": "nvidia-device-plugin-6kqxp/nvidia-driver-installer",
"Cpu": 1.915508718,
"Mem": 663330816
},
{
"Name": "nvidia-device-plugin-l28zc/nvidia-device-plugin",
"Cpu": 0.000836256,
"Mem": 2211840
},
{
"Name": "nvidia-device-plugin-l28zc/nvidia-driver-installer",
"Cpu": 1.916886293,
"Mem": 691449856
},
{
"Name": "nvidia-device-plugin-xb4vh/nvidia-device-plugin",
"Cpu": 0.000515103,
"Mem": 2265088
},
{
"Name": "nvidia-device-plugin-xb4vh/nvidia-driver-installer",
"Cpu": 1.909435982,
"Mem": 832430080
}
],
"50": [
{
...
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54005, 55127, 53850, 55486, 53440). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Validation webhook plugin converts objects to the external version before sending to webhooks
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/492
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
The apiserver sends external versioned object to the admission webhooks now. Please update the webhooks to expect admissionReview.spec.object.raw to be serialized external versions of objects.
```
installer and device plugin containers.
To support this, exports certain functions and fields in
framework/resource_usage_gatherer.go so that it can be used in any
e2e test to track any specified pod resource usage with the specified
probe interval and duration.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54826, 53576, 55591, 54946, 54825). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add downward api and docker container conformance annotations
Signed-off-by: Brad Topol <btopol@us.ibm.com>
Add downward api and docker container conformance annotations
/sig testing
/area conformance
@sig-testing-pr-reviews
This PR adds downward api and docker container related conformance annotations to the e2e test suite.
The PR fixes a portion of #53822. It focuses on adding conformance annotations as defined by the Kubernetes Conformance Workgroup for a subset of the downward api and docker container based e2e conformance tests.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WWSOqFaG35VmmPOYbwetapj1VPOVMqjZfR9ih5To5gk/edit#gid=62929400
for the list of SIG Arch approved test names and descriptions that I am using.
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Kubernetes Submit Queue