Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Update volume OWNERS to reflect active sig-storage reviewers
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Update sig-storage reviewers to add new members and remove those that don't have as much time to review storage PRs. Approvers are unchanged.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
For all those that have been removed, please approve. If you want to remain as a reviewer, let me know and I will add you back.
**Release note**:
NONE
add initial work for mount azure file on windows
fix review comments
full implementation for attach azure file on windows node
working azure file mount
remove useless functions
add a workable implementation about mounting azure file on windows node
fix review comments and make the pod creating successful even azure file mount failed
fix according to review comments
add mount_windows_test
add implementation for IsLikelyNotMountPoint func
remove mount_windows_test.go temporaly
add back unit test for mount_windows.go
add normalizeWindowsPath func
fix normalizeWindowsPath func issue
implment azure disk on windows
update bazel BUILD
revert validation.go change as it's another PR
fix merge issue and compiling issue
fix windows compiling issue
fix according to review comments
fix according to review comments
fix cross-build failure
fix according to review comments
fix test build failure temporalily
fix darwin build failure
fix azure windows test failure
add empty implementation of MakeRShared on windows
fix gofmt errors
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove repeated reviewer's names
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix share name generation in azure file provisioner.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Azure file share name has a length limit of 63, but currently the code is using data volume's limit 75.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
With current implementation, when the cluster name is long, the resulting file share name could have a length of 75.
Also function `GenerateVolumeName` would produce double '-' when clusterName containing '-' is to be truncated.
In both cases, service would reject the creating file share request.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Please refer to:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/naming-and-referencing-shares--directories--files--and-metadata#share-names
- Share names must be from 3 through 63 characters long.
- The name cannot contain two consecutive hyphens.
@rootfs @colemickens
**Release note**:
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43642, 43170, 41813, 42170, 41581)
Enable storage class support in Azure File volume
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Support StorageClass in Azure file volume
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Support StorageClass in Azure file volume
```
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/volume
cc @jsafrane @spothanis @agonzalezro @justinsb @johscheuer @simonswine @nelcy @pmorie @quofelix @sdminonne @thockin @saad-ali @rootfs
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Kubernetes Submit Queue