- Move from the old github.com/golang/glog to k8s.io/klog
- klog as explicit InitFlags() so we add them as necessary
- we update the other repositories that we vendor that made a similar
change from glog to klog
* github.com/kubernetes/repo-infra
* k8s.io/gengo/
* k8s.io/kube-openapi/
* github.com/google/cadvisor
- Entirely remove all references to glog
- Fix some tests by explicit InitFlags in their init() methods
Change-Id: I92db545ff36fcec83afe98f550c9e630098b3135
Individual implementations are not yet being moved.
Fixed all dependencies which call the interface.
Fixed golint exceptions to reflect the move.
Added project info as per @dims and
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project.
Added dims to the security contacts.
Fixed minor issues.
Added missing template files.
Copied ControllerClientBuilder interface to cp.
This allows us to break the only dependency on K8s/K8s.
Added TODO to ControllerClientBuilder.
Fixed GoDeps.
Factored in feedback from JustinSB.
go test in 1.11 now performs some validation of format strings, so
this address the issues highlighted by go test, allowing go test to
pass with 1.11.
Fixes pertaining to storage.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67766, 67642, 67772). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Enable dynamic azure disk volume limits
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Enable dynamic azure disk volume limits,
This is an azure cloud provider implementation related to feature: [Dynamic Maximum volume count](https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/554)
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66269
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This PR use `az.VirtualMachineSizesClient.List` to list all vm sizes under region, match vm size with current node size, and then got `MaxDataDiskCount`, the `GetVolumeLimits` happens in kubelet and will return `attachable-volumes-azure-disk` in node status as following example:
```
agentpool-22082114-0
...
allocatable:
attachable-volumes-azure-disk: "8"
cpu: "2"
ephemeral-storage: "28043041951"
hugepages-1Gi: "0"
hugepages-2Mi: "0"
memory: 7034772Ki
pods: "30"
```
**Release note**:
```
Enable dynamic azure disk volume limits
```
/sig azure
/kind feature
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66916, 67252, 67794, 67619, 67328). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Using a fixed set of locks, then we don't need to free unused locks anymore.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Using a fixed set of locks, then we don't need to free unused locks anymore.
See kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66442 for discussions.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65113
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @msau42
/assign @thockin
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66980, 67604, 67741, 67715). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add support of Azure cross resource group nodes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Part of feature [Cross resource group nodes](https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/604).
This PR adds support of Azure cross resource group nodes that are labeled with `kubernetes.azure.com/resource-group=<rg-name>` and `alpha.service-controller.kubernetes.io/exclude-balancer=true`
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
See designs [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2479).
**Release note**:
```release-note
Azure cloud provider now supports cross resource group nodes that are labeled with `kubernetes.azure.com/resource-group=<rg-name>` and `alpha.service-controller.kubernetes.io/exclude-balancer=true`
```
/sig azure
/kind feature
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59230, 66233, 67483, 67713). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
change default value of kind for azure disk
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
change default value of kind for azure disk, as we are suggesting users to use managed disk, default value should be managed disk.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67480
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
assign @feiskyer
FYI @khenidak @brendandburns
**Release note**:
```
change default value of kind for azure disk
```
/kind feature
/sig azure
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66884, 67410, 67229, 67409). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add node affinity for Azure unzoned managed disks
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Continue of [Azure Availability Zone feature](https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/586).
Add node affinity for Azure unzoned managed disks, so that unzoned disks only scheduled to unzoned nodes.
This is required because Azure doesn't allow attaching unzoned disks to zoned VMs.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Unzoned nodes would label `failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone=0` and the value is fault domain ( while availability zone is used for zoned nodes). So fault domain is used to populate unzoned disks.
Since there are at most 3 fault domains in each region, the PR adds 3 terms for them:
```yaml
kubectl describe pv pvc-bdf93a67-9c45-11e8-ba6f-000d3a07de8c
Name: pvc-bdf93a67-9c45-11e8-ba6f-000d3a07de8c
Labels: <none>
Annotations: pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller=yes
pv.kubernetes.io/provisioned-by=kubernetes.io/azure-disk
volumehelper.VolumeDynamicallyCreatedByKey=azure-disk-dynamic-provisioner
Finalizers: [kubernetes.io/pv-protection]
StorageClass: azuredisk-unzoned
Status: Bound
Claim: default/unzoned-pvc
Reclaim Policy: Delete
Access Modes: RWO
Capacity: 5Gi
Node Affinity:
Required Terms:
Term 0: failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region in [southeastasia]
failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone in [0]
Term 1: failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region in [southeastasia]
failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone in [1]
Term 2: failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region in [southeastasia]
failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone in [2]
Message:
Source:
Type: AzureDisk (an Azure Data Disk mount on the host and bind mount to the pod)
DiskName: k8s-5b3d7b8f-dynamic-pvc-bdf93a67-9c45-11e8-ba6f-000d3a07de8c
DiskURI: /subscriptions/<subscription>/resourceGroups/<rg-name>/providers/Microsoft.Compute/disks/k8s-5b3d7b8f-dynamic-pvc-bdf93a67-9c45-11e8-ba6f-000d3a07de8c
Kind: Managed
FSType:
CachingMode: None
ReadOnly: false
Events: <none>
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add node affinity for Azure unzoned managed disks
```
/sig azure
/kind feature
/cc @brendandburns @khenidak @andyzhangx @msau42
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Attacher/Detacher refactor for local storage
Proposal link: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2438
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Attacher/Detacher refactor for the plugins which just need to mount device, but do not need to attach, such as local storage plugin.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
```release-note
Attacher/Detacher refactor for local storage
```
/sig storage
/kind feature
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65931, 65705, 66033). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Block volumes should have empty FSType
FSType in block PVs has no meaning and it should be empty in provisioned PVs.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**
Fixes#65704
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64416, 63625, 60967, 64767, 64588). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Remove mount.GetMountRefs in favor of mounter.GetMountRefs
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Currently, there are two `GetMountRefs` functions:
- `mount.GetMountRefs`: used in various volume plugins
- `<mounter>.GetMountRefs` (previously `mount.GetMountRefsByDev` introduced in [#49988](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/49988/files#diff-0c0020e71c995790a90ad9c61ede7632R154), moved to `Mounter` interface in #62903)
This is confusing, and it's better to implement `GetMountRefs` on mounter interface, because different mounters can have their own implementation (especially for nsenter).
This pr removes `mount.GetMountRefs` in favor of mounter.GetMountRefs.
More discussions: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/62102#issuecomment-390081884 and https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/62102#issuecomment-390123022.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes Prow Robot