Automatic merge from submit-queue
Inode Eviction Test is Flaky
This Pull Request:
Marks the InodeEviciton test as flaky
Increases the timeout for disk pressure because coreos has nearly 2 million inodes.
Decreases the status polling interval so we can see eviction ordering better.
@Random-Liu
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add a package for handling version numbers (including non-"Semantic" versions)
As noted in #32401, we are using Semantic Version-parsing libraries to parse version numbers that aren't necessarily "Semantic". Although, contrary to what I'd said there, it turns out that this wasn't actually currently a problem for the iptables code, because the regexp used to extract the version number out of the "iptables --version" output only pulled out three components, so given "iptables v1.4.19.1", it would have extracted just "1.4.19". Still, it could be a problem if they later release "1.5" rather than "1.5.0", or if we eventually need to _compare_ against a 4-digit version number.
Also, as noted in #23854, we were also using two different semver libraries in different parts of the code (plus a wrapper around one of them in pkg/version).
This PR adds pkg/util/version, with code to parse and compare both semver and non-semver version strings, and then updates kubernetes to use it everywhere (including getting rid of a bunch of code duplication in kubelet by making utilversion.Version implement the kubecontainer.Version interface directly).
Ironically, this does not actually allow us to get rid of either of the vendored semver libraries, because we still have other dependencies that depend on each of them. (cadvisor uses blang/semver and etcd uses coreos/go-semver)
fixes#32401, #23854
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add an option to run Job in Density/Load config
cc @timothysc @jeremyeder
@erictune @soltysh - I run this test and it seems to me that Job has noticeably worse performance than Deployment. I'll create an issue for this, but this PR is for easy repro.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38609, 38227)
On kubemark master, kubelet now runs as a supervisord process and all master components as pods
This PR fixes issue #37485
On kubemark, previously we had a custom setup that runs master components as top-level processes under supervisord, which is lighter than running kubelet and docker.
This PR makes kubelet run as a process under supervisord and the master components (apiserver, controller-manager, scheduler, etcd) as pods, making testing on kubemark mimic real clusters better.
Also, start-kubemark-master.sh now closely resembles cluster/gce/gci/configure-helper.sh, allowing easy integration in future.
cc @kubernetes/sig-scalability @wojtek-t @gmarek
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38419, 38457, 38607)
Node E2E: Update CVM version to e2e-node-containervm-v20161208-image.
I built the new node e2e image from e2e-node-containervm-v20161208-image.
@timstclair
/cc @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
test: cleanup test logs for deployments
@mfojtik @janetkuo this will help with the deployment logs (should make them a bit cleaner) ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 34002, 38535, 37330, 38522, 38423)
Node E2E: `make test-e2e-node` runs the same test with pr builder by default.
This PR makes `make test-e2e-node` run non-serial, non-flaky, non-slow test by default.
This will make it easier to use.
/cc @timstclair
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37860, 38429, 38451, 36050, 38463)
[Part 2] Adding s390x cross-compilation support for gcr.io images in this repo
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR enables s390x support to kube-dns , pause, addon-manager, etcd, hyperkube, kube-discovery etc. This PR also includes the changes due to which it can be cross compiled on x86 host architecture.
**Which issue this PR fixes#34328
**Special notes for your reviewer**: In existing file "build-tools/build-image/cross/Dockerfile" the repository mentioned for installing cross build tool chains for supporting architecture does not have a tool chain for s390x hence in my PR I am changing the repository so that it will be cross compiled for s390x.
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```
Allows cross compilation of Kubernetes on x86 host for s390x also enables s390x support to kube-dns , pause, addon-manager, etcd, hyperkube, kube-discovery etc
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38354, 38371)
Add GetOptions parameter to Get() calls in client library
Ref #37473
This PR is super mechanical - the non trivial commits are:
- Update client generator
- Register GetOptions in batch/v2alpha1 group
Random-Liu