Allow the garbage collector to tolerate partial discovery failures. On a
partial failure, use whatever was discovered, log the failures, and
allow the resync logic to try again later.
Fixes#55022.
For 1.8 this will be off by default. In 1.9 it will be on by default.
Add tests and rename some fields to use the `chunking` terminology.
Note that the pager may be used for other things besides chunking.
Add a feature gate in the apiserver to control whether paging can be
used. Add controls to the storage factory that allow it to be disabled
per resource. Use a JSON encoded continuation token that can be
versioned. Create a 410 error if the continuation token is expired.
Adds GetContinue() to ListMeta.
Improve GC discovery sync performance by only syncing when discovered
resource diffs are detected. Before, the GC worker pool was shut down
and monitors resynced unconditionally every sync period, leading to
significant processing delays causing test flakes where otherwise
reasonable GC timeouts were being exceeded.
Related to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/49966.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49237, 49656, 49980, 49841, 49899)
GC shouldn't send empty patch
The scope of the `if` statement was wrong, causing GC to sometimes send empty patch.
Found this bug while investigating https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/49966.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50029, 48517, 49739, 49866, 49782)
Update generated deepcopy code
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In generated deepcopy code, the method names in comments do not match the real method names.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#49755
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @sttts @caesarxuchao
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Enhance the garbage collector to periodically refresh the resources it
monitors (via discovery) to enable custom resource definition GC.
This implementation caches Unstructured structs for any kinds not
covered by a shared informer. The existing meta-only codec only supports
compiled types; an improved codec which supports arbitrary types could
be introduced to optimize caching to store only metadata for all
non-informer types.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48224, 45431, 45946, 48775, 49396)
[client-go] Fake Dynamic Client
This commit converts `"k8s.io/client-go/dynamic".Client` to an interface, and implements fake versions of both `ClientPool` and `Client`. This allows components which make uses of these clients to be tested in the same way that clientset-based components can be tested, using the standard `testing.Fake` machinery.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This adds an interface form of dynamic.Client and
dynamic.ResourceClient, making those two follow the general client
conventions: `Interface` is an interface, and `Client` is the concrete
implementation. `ClientPool` retains it's interface status.
This allows us to create a fake implemenation of dyanmic.Interface,
dynamic.ResourceInterface, and dynamic.ClientPool for testing.
The loop should use 'continue' not 'break', otherwise removeFinalizer()
not only removes "orphaningFinalizer" from its finalizers list but
also removes others.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47000, 47188, 47094, 47323, 47124)
GC should retry on patch error
Fixing https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46998.
This is fixing a bug, so applying the 1.7 milestone.
Allow the list of resources the garbage collector controller should
ignore to be customizable, so downstream integrators can add their own
resources to the list, if necessary.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40055, 42085, 44509, 44568, 43956)
Fix gofmt errors
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There were some gofmt errors on master. Ran the following to fix:
```
hack/verify-gofmt.sh | grep ^diff | awk '{ print $2 }' | xargs gofmt -w -s
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: none
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39807, 37505, 39844, 39525, 39109)
Made cache.Controller to be interface.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
#37504
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37845, 39439, 39514, 39457, 38866)
Log a warning message when failed to find kind for resource in garbage collector controller
at this time, I do not think thirdparty api group version resources should be taken care by garbage collector controllers, and this line of call will fail actually: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/controller/garbagecollector/garbagecollector.go#L565, and as a result, the garbagecollector controller failed to start.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/controller
cc @jsafrane @mikedanese @bprashanth @derekwaynecarr @thockin @saad-ali
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone **lgtms** and then someone
experienced in the project **approves**), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
perfectly: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the OWNERS file to add
the names of people that should be reviewing code in the future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers** section.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an approver or reviewer
of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver of the subdirectories too, so not all
OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Dr. Stefan Schimanski