If there are 2 or more PR(s) in the queue, they will end up with
conflicts (and rechecks). So let us remove the timestamp entirely
when we generate the files.
Fixes#46814
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix api description
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
prefered -> preferred
the the -> the
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47451, 47410, 47598, 47616, 47473)
Revert "Ignore `daemonset-controller-hash` label key in federation before comparing the federated object with its cluster equivalent."
This reverts commit 3530c9ce87.
~This needs to wait for #47258, otherwise federation test won't pass~ (merged)
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add NodeInternalIP as a fallback to federation api-server nodeport service
Previously NodeLegacyHostIP was used as a fallback (see #41243) but in 1.7 it was removed (#44830)
Now clusters where nodes have not set ExternalIP can not be used by kubefed to setup federation.
cc @shashidharatd
```release-note
kubefed will now configure NodeInternalIP as the federation API server endpoint when NodeExternalIP is unavailable for federation API servers exposed as NodePort services
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Made image as required in v1 Container struct.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#47244
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43005, 46660, 46385, 46991, 47103)
Ignore `daemonset-controller-hash` label key in federation before comparing the federated object with its cluster equivalent.
Kubernetes daemonset controller writes a daemonset's hash to the object label as an optimization to avoid recomputing it every time. Adding a new label to the object that the federation is unaware of causes problems because federated controllers compare the objects in federation and their equivalents in clusters and try to reconcile them. This leads to a constant fight between the federated daemonset
controller and the cluster controllers, and they never reach a stable state.
Ideally, cluster components should not update an object's spec or metadata in a way federation cannot replicate. They can update an object's status though. Therefore, this daemonset hash should be a
field in daemonset's status, not a label in object meta. @janetkuo says that this label is only a short term solution. In the near future, they are going to replace it with revision numbers in daemonset status. We
can then rip this bandaid out.
Fixes#46925
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @csbell
/cc @shashidharatd @marun @nikhiljindal @perotinus
/sig federation
Kubernetes daemonset controller writes a daemonset's hash to the object
label as an optimization to avoid recomputing it every time. Adding a
new label to the object that the federation is unaware of causes
problems because federated controllers compare the objects in
federation and their equivalents in clusters and try to reconcile them.
This leads to a constant fight between the federated daemonset
controller and the cluster controllers, and they never reach a stable
state.
Ideally, cluster components should not update an object's spec or
metadata in a way federation cannot replicate. They can update an
object's status though. Therefore, this daemonset hash should be a
field in daemonset's status, not a label in object meta. @janetkuo says
that this label is only a short term solution. In the near future, they
are going to replace it with revision numbers in daemonset status. We
can then rip this bandaid out.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46235, 44786, 46833, 46756, 46669)
federation: Add admission controller for policy-based placement
@nikhiljindal
Here's the initial version of the scheduling policy admission controller. It's at the point where it would benefit from having another pair of eyes look at it. The main thing I'm unsure of is the serialization of Kube resources for the webhook/query call.
Release Note:
```
The federation-apiserver now supports a SchedulingPolicy admission controller that enables policy-based control over placement of federated resources.
```
Ref #39982
Handle failure cases on startup gracefully to avoid causing cascading
errors and poor initialization in other components. Initial errors from
config load cause the initializer to pause and hold requests. Return
typed errors to better communicate failures to clients.
Add code to handle two specific cases - admin wants to bypass
initialization defaulting, and mirror pods (which want to bypass
initialization because the kubelet owns their lifecycle).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45871, 46498, 46729, 46144, 46804)
Fix some comments in dnsprovider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This is part of the namespace deletion big hammer. `kubefed join` not
just creates federation-system namespace, but also cluster role and
cluster role bindings in the joining clusters. Sometimes unjoin fails
to delete them. So we use a big hammer here to delete them.
This smells like a real problem in kubefed and needs investigation.
This is a short term fix to unblock the submit queue.
This is a big hammer. `kubefed join` creates federation-system namespace
in the joining clusters if they don't already exist. This namespace
usually exists in the host cluster and hence cannot be deleted while
unjoining. So in order to be safe, we don't delete the federation-system
namespace from any federated cluster while unjoining them. This causes
a problem in our test environment if certain resources are left in the
namespace. Therefore we are deleting all federation-system namespace in
all the clusters.
PV is a non-namespaced resource. Running `kubectl delete pv --all`, even
with `--namespace` is going to delete all the PVs in the cluster. This
is a dangerous operation and should not be deleted this way.
Instead we now retrieve the PVs bound to the PVCs in the namespace we
are deleteing and delete only those PVs.
Fixes issue #46380.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement Daemonset history
~Depends on #45867 (the 1st commit, ignore it when reviewing)~ (already merged)
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/527/ and https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/594
@kubernetes/sig-apps-api-reviews @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews @erictune @kow3ns @lukaszo @kargakis
---
TODOs:
- [x] API changes
- [x] (maybe) Remove rollback subresource if we decide to do client-side rollback
- [x] deployment controller
- [x] controller revision
- [x] owner ref (claim & adoption)
- [x] history reconstruct (put revision number, hash collision avoidance)
- [x] de-dup history and relabel pods
- [x] compare ds template with history
- [x] hash labels (put it in controller revision, pods, and maybe deployment)
- [x] clean up old history
- [x] Rename status.uniquifier when we reach consensus in #44774
- [x] e2e tests
- [x] unit tests
- [x] daemoncontroller_test.go
- [x] update_test.go
- [x] ~(maybe) storage_test.go // if we do server side rollback~
kubectl part is in #46144
---
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 36721, 46483, 45500, 46724, 46036)
Federation: Minor corrections in service controller and add a unit testcase
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR fixes few outdated comments in federation service controller and few other minor fixes.
This also adds a unit test case to test federated service deletion.
/assign @quinton-hoole
/cc @marun @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add initializer support to admission and uninitialized filtering to rest storage
Initializers are the opposite of finalizers - they allow API clients to react to object creation and populate fields prior to other clients seeing them.
High level description:
1. Add `metadata.initializers` field to all objects
2. By default, filter objects with > 0 initializers from LIST and WATCH to preserve legacy client behavior (known as partially-initialized objects)
3. Add an admission controller that populates .initializer values per type, and denies mutation of initializers except by certain privilege levels (you must have the `initialize` verb on a resource)
4. Allow partially-initialized objects to be viewed via LIST and WATCH for initializer types
5. When creating objects, the object is "held" by the server until the initializers list is empty
6. Allow some creators to bypass initialization (set initializers to `[]`), or to have the result returned immediately when the object is created.
The code here should be backwards compatible for all clients because they do not see partially initialized objects unless they GET the resource directly. The watch cache makes checking for partially initialized objects cheap. Some reflectors may need to change to ask for partially-initialized objects.
```release-note
Kubernetes resources, when the `Initializers` admission controller is enabled, can be initialized (defaulting or other additive functions) by other agents in the system prior to those resources being visible to other clients. An initialized resource is not visible to clients unless they request (for get, list, or watch) to see uninitialized resources with the `?includeUninitialized=true` query parameter. Once the initializers have completed the resource is then visible. Clients must have the the ability to perform the `initialize` action on a resource in order to modify it prior to initialization being completed.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46239, 46627, 46346, 46388, 46524)
move labels to components which own the APIs
During the apimachinery split in 1.6, we accidentally moved several label APIs into apimachinery. They don't belong there, since the individual APIs are not general machinery concerns, but instead are the concern of particular components: most commonly the kubelet. This pull moves the labels into their owning components and out of API machinery.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @kubernetes/api-reviewers @kubernetes/api-approvers
@derekwaynecarr since most of these are related to the kubelet
Add support for creating resources that are not immediately visible to
naive clients, but must first be initialized by one or more privileged
cluster agents. These controllers can mark the object as initialized,
allowing others to see them.
Permission to override initialization defaults or modify an initializing
object is limited per resource to a virtual subresource "RESOURCE/initialize"
via RBAC.
Initialization is currently alpha.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46801, 45184, 45930, 46192, 45563)
[Federation] Add a SchedulingAdapter that can extend the FederatedTypeAdapter and that provides hooks for scheduling objects into clusters.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
apiserver: add a webhook implementation of the audit backend
This builds off of #45315 and is intended to implement an interfaced defined in #45766.
TODO:
- [x] Rebase on top of API types PR.
- [x] Rebase on top of API types updates (#46065)
- [x] Rebase on top of feature flag (#46009)
- [x] Rebase on top of audit instrumentation.
- [x] Hook up API server flag or register plugin (depending on #45766)
Features issue https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/22
Design proposal https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/auditing.md
```release-notes
Webhook added to the API server which omits structured audit log events.
```
/cc @soltysh @timstclair @soltysh @deads2k
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add Local Storage Capacity Isolation API
This PR adds the new APIs to support storage capacity isolation as
described in the proposal [https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/306](url)
1. Add SizeLimit for emptyDir volume
2. Add scratch and overlay storage type used by container level or
node level
**Release note**:
```release-note
Alpha feature: Local volume Storage Capacity Isolation allows users to set storage limit to isolate EmptyDir volumes, container storage overlay, and also supports allocatable storage for shared root file system.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46686, 45049, 46323, 45708, 46487)
[Federation][kubefed]: Use StorageClassName for etcd pvc
This PR updates kubefed to use the StorageClassName field [added in 1.6](http://blog.kubernetes.io/2017/03/dynamic-provisioning-and-storage-classes-kubernetes.html
) for etcd's pvc to allow the user to specify which storage class they want to use. If no value is provided to ``kubefed init``, the field will not be set, and initialization of the pvc may fail on a cluster without a default storage class configured.
The alpha annotation that was previously used (``volume.alpha.kubernetes.io/storage-class``) was deprecated as of 1.4 according to the following blog post:
http://blog.kubernetes.io/2016/10/dynamic-provisioning-and-storage-in-kubernetes.html
**Release note**:
```
'kubefed init' has been updated to support specification of the storage class (via --etcd-pv-storage-class) for the Persistent Volume Claim (PVC) used for etcd storage. If --etcd-pv-storage-class is not specified, the default storage class configured for the cluster will be used.
```
cc: @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews
Madhusudan.C.S