Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40175, 41107, 41111, 40893, 40919)
[Federation][e2e] Move Cluster Registration to federation-up.sh
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Remove cluster register/unregister calls from test case BeforeEach/AfterEach blocks.
Register clusters once in federation-up.sh
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#40768
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**: `NONE`
cc: @madhusudancs @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38796, 40823, 40756, 41083, 41105)
e2e tests for vSphere cloud provider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR contains changes for existing e2e volume provisioning test cases for running on vsphere cloud provider.
**Following is the summary of changes made in existing e2e test cases**
**Added test/e2e/persistent_volumes-vsphere.go**
- This test verifies deleting a PVC before the pod does not cause pod deletion to fail on PD detach and deleting the PV before the pod does not cause pod deletion to fail on PD detach.
**test/e2e/volume_provisioning.go**
- This test creates a StorageClass and claim with dynamic provisioning and alpha dynamic provisioning annotations and verifies that required volumes are getting created. Test also verifies that created volume is readable and retaining data.
- Added vsphere as supported cloud provider. Also set pluginName to "kubernetes.io/vsphere-volume" for vsphere cloud provider.
**test/e2e/volumes.go**
- Added test spec for vsphere
- This test creates requested volume, mount it on the pod, write some random content at /opt/0/index.html and verifies file contents are perfect to make sure we don't see the content from previous test runs.
- This test also passes "1234" as fsGroup to mount volume and verifies fsGroup is set correctly.
**added test/e2e/vsphere_utils.go**
- Added function verifyVSphereDiskAttached - Verify the persistent disk attached to the node.
- Added function waitForVSphereDiskToDetach - Wait until vsphere vmdk is deteched from the given node or time out after 5 minutes
- Added getVSpherePersistentVolumeSpec - create vsphere volume spec with given VMDK volume path, Reclaim Policy and labels
- Added getVSpherePersistentVolumeClaimSpec - get vsphere persistent volume spec with given selector labels
- createVSphereVolume - function to create vmdk volume
**Following is the summary of new e2e tests added with this PR**
**test/e2e/vsphere_volume_placement.go**
- contains volume placement tests using node label selector
- Test Back-to-back pod creation/deletion with the same volume source on the same worker node
- Test Back-to-back pod creation/deletion with the same volume source attach/detach to different worker nodes
**test/e2e/pv_reclaimpolicy.go**
- contains tests for PV/PVC - Reclaiming Policy
- Test verifies persistent volume should be deleted when reclaimPolicy on the PV is set to delete and associated claim is deleted
- Test also verified that persistent volume should be retained when reclaimPolicy on the PV is set to retain and associated claim is deleted
**test/e2e/pvc_label_selector.go**
- This is function test for Selector-Label Volume Binding Feature.
- Verify volume with the matching label is bounded with the PVC.
Other changes
Updated pkg/cloudprovider/providers/vsphere/BUILD and test/e2e/BUILD
**Which issue this PR fixes** *
fixes # 41087
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Updated tests were executed on kubernetes v1.4.8 release on vsphere.
Test steps are provided in comments
@kerneltime @BaluDontu
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40345, 38183, 40236, 40861, 40900)
Remove checks for pods responding in deployment e2e tests
Fixes#39879
Remove it because it caused deployment e2e tests sometimes timed out waiting for pods responding, and pods responding isn't related to deployment controller and is not a prerequisite of deployment e2e tests.
@kargakis
addressed review comments
Addressed review comment for pv_reclaimpolicy.go to verify content of the volume
addressed 2nd round of review comments
addressed 3rd round of review comments from jeffvance
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41023, 41031, 40947)
scrub aggregator names to eliminate discovery
Cleanup old uses of `discovery`. Also removes the legacy functionality.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40971, 41027, 40709, 40903, 39369)
Promote SubjectAccessReview to v1
We have multiple features that depend on this API:
SubjectAccessReview
- [webhook authorization](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/#webhook-mode)
- [kubelet delegated authorization](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/#kubelet-authorization)
- add-on API server delegated authorization
The API has been in use since 1.3 in beta status (v1beta1) with negligible changes:
- Added a status field for reporting errors evaluating access
- A typo was discovered in the SubjectAccessReviewSpec Groups field name
This PR promotes the existing v1beta1 API to v1, with the only change being the typo fix to the groups field. (fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/32709)
Because the API does not persist data (it is a query/response-style API), there are no data migration concerns.
This positions us to promote the features that depend on this API to stable in 1.7
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-api-reviews @kubernetes/sig-auth-misc
```release-note
The authorization.k8s.io API group was promoted to v1
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40971, 41027, 40709, 40903, 39369)
Bump GCI to gci-beta-56-9000-80-0
cc/ @Random-Liu @adityakali
Changelogs since gci-dev-56-8977-0-0 (currently used in Kubernetes):
- "net.ipv4.conf.eth0.forwarding" and "net.ipv4.ip_forward" may get reset to 0
- Track CVE-2016-9962 in Docker in GCI
- Linux kernel CVE-2016-7097
- Linux kernel CVE-2015-8964
- Linux kernel CVE-2016-6828
- Linux kernel CVE-2016-7917
- Linux kernel CVE-2016-7042
- Linux kernel CVE-2016-9793
- Linux kernel CVE-2016-7039 and CVE-2016-8666
- Linux kernel CVE-2016-8655
- Toolbox: allow docker image to be loaded from local tarball
- Update compute-image-package in GCI
- Change the product name on /etc/os-release (to COS)
- Remove 'dogfood' from HWID_OVERRIDE in /etc/lsb-release
- Include Google NVME extensions to optimize LocalSSD performance.
- /proc/<pid>/io missing on GCI (enables process stats accounting)
- Enable BLK_DEV_THROTTLING
cc/ @roberthbailey @fabioy for GKE cluster update
Automatic merge from submit-queue
federation: Refactoring namespaced resources deletion code from kube ns controller and sharing it with fed ns controller
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/33612
Refactoring code in kube namespace controller to delete all resources in a namespace when the namespace is deleted. Refactored this code into a separate NamespacedResourcesDeleter class and calling it from federation namespace controller.
This is required for enabling cascading deletion of namespaced resources in federation apiserver.
Before this PR, we were directly deleting the namespaced resources and assuming that they go away immediately. With cascading deletion, we will have to wait for the corresponding controllers to first delete the resources from underlying clusters and then delete the resource from federation control plane. NamespacedResourcesDeleter has this waiting logic.
cc @kubernetes/sig-federation-misc @caesarxuchao @derekwaynecarr @mwielgus
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40385, 40786, 40999, 41026, 40996)
Refactor federated services tests a bit to move a test that requires no cluster creation to a separate block.
Follow up to PR #40769.
cc @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Replace hand-written informers with generated ones
Replace existing uses of hand-written informers with generated ones.
Follow-up commits will switch the use of one-off informers to shared
informers.
This is a precursor to #40097. That PR will switch one-off informers to shared informers for the majority of the code base (but not quite all of it...).
NOTE: this does create a second set of shared informers in the kube-controller-manager. This will be resolved back down to a single factory once #40097 is reviewed and merged.
There are a couple of places where I expanded the # of caches we wait for in the calls to `WaitForCacheSync` - please pay attention to those. I also added in a commented-out wait in the attach/detach controller. If @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews is ok with enabling the waiting, I'll do it (I'll just need to tweak an integration test slightly).
@deads2k @sttts @smarterclayton @liggitt @soltysh @timothysc @lavalamp @wojtek-t @gmarek @sjenning @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
Remove it because it caused deployment e2e tests sometimes timed out
waiting for pods responding, and pods responding isn't related to
deployment controller and is not a prerequisite of deployment e2e tests.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40978, 40994, 41008, 40622)
Refactored kubemark code into provider-specific and provider-independent parts [Part-2]
Applying part of the changes of PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39033 (which refactored kubemark code completely). The changes included in this PR are:
- Added test/kubemark/skeleton/util.sh which defines a well-commented interface that any cloud-provider should implement to run kubemark.
This includes functions like creating the master machine instance along with its resources, remotely executing a given command on the master (like ssh), scp, deleting the master instance and its resources.
All these functions have to be over-ridden by each cloud provider inside the file /test/kubemark/$CLOUD_PROVIDER/util.sh
- Implemented the above mentioned interface for gce in /test/kubemark/$CLOUD_PROVIDER/util.sh
- Made start- and stop- kubemark scripts (almost) provider independent by making them source the interface based on cloud provider.
@kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc @wojtek-t @gmarek
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add SIG to test owners
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds a `sig` column to the test owners file generation script.
A problem experienced with the current owners file is that since members are auto-assigned there are times where tests are assigned to non-active users who don't follow up to notifications to fix flakes. By assigning a SIG to each test we can hold a group we know is active responsible for taking care of flakes it's less likely that flakes will fall through the cracks.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
* A companion PR will go into *kubernetes/contrib* adding support for mungers parsing this new column.
* Another PR in contrib will add labeling GitHub flake issues with the appropriate SIG
* Currently SIGs are not labeled, this will be added in another PR where SIG determinations can be discussed
@saad-ali @pwittrock
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40289, 40877, 40879, 39972, 40942)
Rename experimental-cgroups-per-pod flag
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. Rename `experimental-cgroups-per-qos` to `cgroups-per-qos`
1. Update hack/local-up-cluster to match `CGROUP_DRIVER` with docker runtime if used.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
We plan to roll this feature out in the upcoming release. Previous node e2e runs were running with this feature on by default. We will default this feature on for all e2es next week.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Rename --experiemental-cgroups-per-qos to --cgroups-per-qos
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40289, 40877, 40879, 39972, 40942)
PV E2E: provide each spec with a fresh nfs host
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
PersistentVolume e2e currently reuses an NFS host pod created at the start of the suite and accessed by each test. This is far less favorable than using a fresh volume per test. Additionally, this guards against the volume host pod or it's kubelet being disrupted, which has led to flakes.
```release-note-none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40906, 40924, 40938, 40902, 40911)
Add [Flaky] tag to persistent volumes tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Persistent Volume tests continue to flake in CI.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add an upgrade test for secrets.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR adds an upgrade test for secrets. It creates a secret and makes sure that pods can consume it before an after an upgrade.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40696, 39914, 40374)
Forgiveness library changes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Splited from #34825, contains library changes that are needed to implement forgiveness:
1. ~~make taints-tolerations matching respect timestamps, so that one toleration can just tolerate a taint for only a period of time.~~ As TaintManager is caching taints and observing taint changes, time-based checking is now outside the library (in TaintManager). see #40355.
2. make tolerations respect wildcard key.
3. add/refresh some related functions to wrap taints-tolerations operation.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Related issue: #1574
Related PR: #34825, #39469
~~Please note that the first 2 commits in this PR come from #39469 .~~
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
~~Since currently we have `pkg/api/helpers.go` and `pkg/api/v1/helpers.go`, there are some duplicated periods of code laying in these two files.~~
~~Ideally we should move taints-tolerations related functions into a separate package (pkg/util/taints), and make it a unified set of implementations. But I'd just suggest to do it in a follow-up PR after Forgiveness ones done, in case of feature Forgiveness getting blocked to long.~~
**Release note**:
```release-note
make tolerations respect wildcard key
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40864, 40666, 38382, 40874)
Density Test includes deletion and volumes
Moved the calls to deletePodSync to BEFORE logDensityTimeSeries. This is because the parser considers a line printed in logDensityTimeSeries to be the "end" of the test. This change includes deletion in the "test window", but makes no other changes.
I also added volumes to the test, so that we can make sure that mounting and unmounting volumes are also taken into account for performance profiling.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40864, 40666, 38382, 40874)
Promote init containers to GA
This is proposed for 1.6
PR moves beta proved concept for init containers to stable. Specification of init containers can be now stated under initContainers field in PodSpec/PodTemplateSpec. Specifying init-containers in annotation is still possible, but will be removed in future version.
```release-note
Init containers have graduated to GA and now appear as a field. The beta annotation value will still be respected and overrides the field value.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40864, 40666, 38382, 40874)
test: reduce deployment progress deadline, ensure its rs is up
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/39785 by reducing the deadline of the expected progress and making sure the new replica set is up before checking the deployment condition.
@kubernetes/sig-apps-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40884, 40809, 40845, 40866, 40875)
Remove many job e2e tests.
These tests have equivalent unit test coverage as far as I can tell, in [pkg/controller/job/jobcontroller_test.go](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/controller/job/jobcontroller_test.go). See #40839 for context.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40884, 40809, 40845, 40866, 40875)
Node E2E: Create new ubuntu image with docker 1.12.6.
We should test the newest docker 1.12 version - 1.12.6.
/cc @dchen1107 @yujuhong @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
Kubernetes Submit Queue