Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
verify no extra RS was created when re-creating a deployment
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR verifies no extra RS was created when re-creating a deployment to adopt previously orphaned RS by improving existing `testDeploymentsControllerRef` e2e test. This also verifies that collision avoidance mechanism works as expected.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#59213
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig apps
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59010, 59212, 59281, 59014, 59297). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Replace nominateNodeName annotation with PodStatus.NominatedNodeName
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Replaces nominateNodeName annotation with PodStatus.NominatedNodeName in scheudler's logic. We don't expect any logic/behavior changes.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
ref #57471
/sig scheduling
cc: @k82cn @aveshagarwal @resouer
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59010, 59212, 59281, 59014, 59297). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix deployment's collision avoidance mechanism
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR modifies deployment's collision avoidance mechanism to take into account a replicaset's `.Labels` field change. This ensures that the mechanism can be triggered when the user updates only the `.Labels` field of the replicaset without modifying the replicaset's PodTemplateSpec.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
xref #59213
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59010, 59212, 59281, 59014, 59297). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix flaky AdmissionWebhook e2e-crd tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Several of the tests("It") in the e2e suite reuse the CRD.
However they each try to setup and tear down the CRD independently.
Since these tests can be running in parallel, causing intermittant
failures.
Changes the test to set up one shared CRD and reuse.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#58855
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Patch ingress upgrade test to ignore checking certain GCP resources
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In certain situations, GCP resources after an upgrade or downgrade will be different because of semantic changes to the glbc. Therefore in the test, we need to account for this difference and make sure the test does not fail because of it.
```release-note
None
```
cc @MrHohn
/assign @bowei
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59276, 51042, 58973, 59377, 59472). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix local PV node affinity tests and only run once
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
* Don't look for specific scheduling error messages for the NodeAffinity tests. Unit/integration will cover that.
* Move PV NodeAffinity tests outside the local volume loop. Mounts are not involved so don't need to be tested per volume type.
* Move mount failure tests outside the local volume loop.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#59369
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59276, 51042, 58973, 59377, 59472). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Update Container Runtime Interface to use enumerated namespace modes
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This updates the CRI as described in the [Shared PID Namespace](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/node/pod-pid-namespace.md#container-runtime-interface-changes) proposal. This change to the alpha API is not backwards compatible: implementations of the CRI will need to update to the new API version.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
WIP #1615
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @yujuhong
**Release note**:
```release-note
[action-required] The Container Runtime Interface (CRI) version has increased from v1alpha1 to v1alpha2. Runtimes implementing the CRI will need to update to the new version, which configures container namespaces using an enumeration rather than booleans.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59276, 51042, 58973, 59377, 59472). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Allow passing request-timeout from NewRequest all the way down
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Currently if you pass `--request-timeout` it's not passed all the way down to the actual request object. There's a separate field on the `Request` object that allows setting that timeout, but it's not taken from that flag.
@smarterclayton @deads2k ptal, this is coming from https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/13701
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Do not recycle volumes that are used by pods
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Recycler should wait until all pods that use a volume are finished.
Consider this scenario:
1. User creates a PVC that's bound to a NFS PV.
2. User creates a pod that uses the PVC
3. User deletes the PVC.
Now the PV gets `Released` (the PVC does not exists) and recycled, however the PV is still mounted to a running pod. PVC protection won't help us, because it puts finalizers on PVC that is under user's control and user can remove it.
This PR checks that there is no pod that uses a PV before it recycles it.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
remove a todo which is out of date
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix todo: move container.go to e2e/framework
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This also incorporates the version string into the package name so
that incompatibile versions will fail to connect.
Arbitrary choices:
- The proto3 package name is runtime.v1alpha2. The proto compiler
normally translates this to a go package of "runtime_v1alpha2", but
I renamed it to "v1alpha2" for consistency with existing packages.
- kubelet/apis/cri is used as "internalapi". I left it alone and put the
public "runtimeapi" in kubelet/apis/cri/runtime.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59394, 58769, 59423, 59363, 59245). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
kube-scheduler: Use default predicates/prioritizers if they are unspecified in the policy config
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The scheduler has built-in default sets of predicate/prioritizer that are applied on pod scheduling. It can also take a policy config file where predicate/prioritizer and extender settings can be specified. The current behavior is that if we want to configure an extender using the policy config, we have to also provide the default predicate/prioritizer settings. Otherwise, the empty predicate/prioritizer sets will be used.
This is inconvenient, and it's hard to keep the policy config up to date with the scheduler's defaults. This PR changes the scheduler to use the default predicate/prioritizer sets if they are unspecified in the policy config. But an empty list would bypass non-mandatory predicates/prioritizers.
This will change the behavior of a policy config that does not specify (but not empty list) predicate/prioritizer, but it's unlike someone is using such config in practice.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I think it makes sense to have this in 1.9 as well because
- It's safe, given the scope of this change and the fact that it's very unlikely that someone is using a policy config with empty predicates/prioritizers.
- Compared with the risk, asking users to provide the default predicate/prioritizer sets for is error-prone and may cause other issues.
**Release note**:
```release-note
kube-scheduler: Use default predicates/prioritizers if they are unspecified in the policy config
```
/sig scheduling
/assign @bsalamat
/cc @vishh
Several of the tests("It") in the e2e suite reuse the CRD.
However they each try to setup and tear down the CRD independently.
Since these tests can be running in parallel, causing intermittant
failures.
Added a new framework utility for creating CRDs per test.
Then making the relevant tests use the utility to prevent name
collision/race.
Fixed bazel build.
Factored in fixes for @caesarxuchao
Making suggested change for @janetkuo
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 52942, 58415). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Improve messaging on volume expansion
- we now provide clear message to user what to do when cloudprovider resizing is finished
and file system resizing is needed.
- add a event when resizing is successful
- Use PATCH both in controller-manager and kubelet for updating PVC status
- Remove code duplication between controller-manager and kubelet for updating PVC status
- Only remove conditions that are managed by resize controller
```release-note
Improve messages user gets during and after volume resizing is done.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Increase RSS limit for runtime from 300MB to 350MB on test creating 100 pods per node.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In recent COS image (cos-dev-65), the typical RSS increased a bit. It seems it was already close to the limit and now surpassed it.
I looked at some samples of failures of the test... In [some cases](https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cosdev-k8sbeta-serial/1270) it seems very close (<1%), a [more representative example](https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cosdev-k8sbeta-serial/1266) goes up about ~5% but in [some](https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cosdev-k8sbeta-serial/1269) [cases](https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cosdev-k8sbeta-serial/1267) it did go up to close or above 340MB.
I did some tests using just "docker" on the machines, creating 100 "pause" containers. I didn't really see much difference in RSS, though after killing the containers RSS was a bit higher on the host running cos-dev.
I looked at some possible reasons that would explain that:
- Transparent huge pages: confirmed they were disabled;
- Version of docker: same on cos-65, cos-64 and cos-63;
- Version of Go: same, 1.9.2 on cos-64 and cos-65, while 1.9.1 on cos-63 but 64 was already using same as current version;
- Version of systemd (maybe due to systemd libraries linked into Docker?): same on the three images.
I don't really know what can explain this increase... So cc @adityakali in case he has something to add here. Also cc @yguo0905 with whom I discussed the testgrid.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
N/A
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
N/A
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59373, 59379, 59252, 58295, 57786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
GCE: Check nodeports are covered by firewall rule with port ranges
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When testing firewalls for GCE ingresses, we should assert that particular nodeports are covered by individual ports or port ranges. Currently, port ranges are not acceptable input.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Will fix the currently erroring `ingress-gce-e2e` tests
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @MrHohn
/assign @bowei
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55986, 59375, 59334, 59348, 58027). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add minimal types for service account TokenRequest API
Adds parts of the types in https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/1460. ValidityDuration is omitted because we are still discussing how to surface non-expiring tokens but it should be easy to add in a backwards compatibly.
#58790
@kubernetes/sig-auth-api-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 58184, 59307, 58172). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix todo: migrate to use AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode and RemoveLabelOffNode replace of updateNodeLabels
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix todo: migrate to use framework.AddOrUpdateLabelOnNode/framework.RemoveLabelOffNode replace of updateNodeLabels
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59158, 38320, 59059, 55516, 59357). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Promote v1alpha1 meta to v1beta1
No code changes, just renames. We can discuss if there are any field / naming changes here or in a follow-up
Parent #58536Fixes#53224
Prereq to #55637
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews @deads2k
```release-note
The `meta.k8s.io/v1alpha1` objects for retrieving tabular responses from the server (`Table`) or fetching just the `ObjectMeta` for an object (as `PartialObjectMetadata`) are now beta as part of `meta.k8s.io/v1beta1`. Clients may request alternate representations of normal Kubernetes objects by passing an `Accept` header like `application/json;as=Table;g=meta.k8s.io;v=v1beta1` or `application/json;as=PartialObjectMetadata;g=meta.k8s.io;v1=v1beta1`. Older servers will ignore this representation or return an error if it is not available. Clients may request fallback to the normal object by adding a non-qualified mime-type to their `Accept` header like `application/json` - the server will then respond with either the alternate representation if it is supported or the fallback mime-type which is the normal object response.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
reopen#58913 Fix TODO move GetPauseImageNameForHostArch func
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
reopen#58913 Fix TODO move GetPauseImageNameForHostArch func,because of I squash to a single commit wrong,so recommit one,and close the #58913
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @liggitt
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 58645, 59211). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fixing node labels assignment for random order tests execution
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
For some vsphere cloud provider e2e test cases, we are setting node labels to control pod scheduling on specific node.
When these e2e tests are executed in random order from testsuite, they are overwriting node labels, so some tests were failing to schedule pod on desired node. Tests are failing with following error.
```
“FailedScheduling: No nodes are available that match all of the predicates: MatchNodeSelector (5), NodeUnschedulable (1).
```
This PR is fixing the above issue with setting distinct node label key for each test group within test suite.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Executed testsuites containing tests from both files using following script.
```
GINKGO_FOCUS[0]="Volume\sPlacement"
GINKGO_FOCUS[1]="Volume\sDisk\sFormat"
REGEX="--ginkgo.focus="$(IFS='|' ; echo "${GINKGO_FOCUS[*]}")
go run hack/e2e.go --check-version-skew=false --v --test --test_args="${REGEX}"
```
All test passed.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55606, 59185, 58763, 59072, 59251). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Introduce apiserver profile-gathering in our testing framework
This enables automatic collection of CPU/Memory profiles for apiserver - saving us some effort while doing scalability experiments.
/cc @wojtek-t @porridge @kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55439, 58564, 59028, 59169, 59259). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add basic functionality deployment integration tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds basic deployment integration tests.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
xref #52113
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Make predicate errors more human readable
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Make predicate errors more human readable
Thanks.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
ref #58546
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Perform resize of mounted volume if necessary
Under certain conditions - we must perform resize of volume even when it is mounted. This enables us to get around problem of resizing volumes used by deployments etc.
```release-note
Allow expanding mounted volumes
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
[e2e ingress-gce] Retrieve the correct health check resource
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Previously the test retrieves a random health check resource and assumes it belongs to the test ingress, which is wrong when multiple ingress tests are running simultaneously.
Example failure: https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-ingress-gce-e2e/533
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @rramkumar1 @nicksardo
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
tossmilestone