Commit Graph

9 Commits (3ebb8ddd8a21b4b8eca05c0e4a01c91617bd245f)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dan Williams 63c01133f8 proxy/userspace: add dcbw and danwinship to OWNERS approvers
Per recommendation of @thockin:

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/71735#pullrequestreview-189515580

---
IMO this code is as dead as it could be. The only significant user is OpenShift as far as I know. I'd rather never touch it again, but I know that is not realistic.

Also, it seems like maybe this could be broken into a couple commits for easier review?

I raised some questions about this design, but I think you should add yourselves as approvers in OWNERS for this subdir. If it evolves, I will lose context on the impl. I don't think it is covered by e2e, either (more argument for breaking it to a separate repo and having its own e2e tests)
---
2019-04-08 12:38:22 -05:00
Kubernetes Prow Robot 808f2cf0ef
Merge pull request #72525 from justinsb/owners_should_not_be_executable
Remove executable file permission from OWNERS files
2019-02-14 23:55:45 -08:00
Kubernetes Prow Robot 5b7a790d35
Merge pull request #72185 from dcbw/owners-label-sig-network
OWNERS: add label:sig/network to a bunch of places
2019-02-08 10:36:16 -08:00
Roy Lenferink b43c04452f Updated OWNERS files to include link to docs 2019-02-04 22:33:12 +01:00
Justin SB dd19b923b7
Remove executable file permission from OWNERS files 2019-01-11 16:42:59 -08:00
Dan Williams 2e339188ed OWNERS: add label:sig/network to a bunch of places 2018-12-19 00:00:02 -06:00
Mike Danese c201553f27 remove some people from OWNERS so they don't get reviews anymore
These are googlers who don't work on the project anymore but are still
getting reviews assigned to them:
- bprashanth
- rjnagal
- vmarmol
2017-07-13 10:02:21 -07:00
Tim Hockin 19dd9c1271 Reduce to folks with context 2016-11-15 08:51:12 +01:00
Antoine Pelisse cbbf366f1f Update OWNERS approvers and reviewers: pkg/proxy 2016-11-09 10:17:55 -08:00