Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make fluentd-gcp run with host network
Fluentd-gcp should have access to instance's platform-dependent service account in order to work.
/cc @piosz
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add event exporter deployment to the fluentd-gcp addon
Introduce event exporter deployment to the fluentd-gcp addon so that by default if logging to Stackdriver is enabled, events will be available there also.
In this release, event exporter is a non-critical pod in BestEffort QoS class to avoid preempting actual workload in tightly loaded clusters. It will become critical in one of the future releases.
```release-note
Stackdriver cluster logging now deploys a new component to export Kubernetes events.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42070, 42127)
Remove fluentd-gcp image sources
This PR removes fluentd-gcp image sources from the main kubernetes repo to move it the `contrib`: https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/pull/2426
Once image is moved, it will be maintained by Stackdriver team (@igorpeshansky, @qingling128 and @dhrupadb)
CC @ixdy @timstclair
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42126, 42130, 42232, 42245, 41932)
Update fluentd-gcp configuration for hosted masters
This PR makes use of the new fluentd-gcp image, which is not configured per se, for the hosted masters, which cannot use configmaps.
Mirroring https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/42126
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move fluentd DS config to configmap
This is the logical continuation of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41998. This PR makes fluentd-gcp DaemonSet use the new image configured using ConfigMap.
This PR doesn't change the way fluentd-gcp works in case master is not registered, that'll be fixed in a separate PR
CC @ixdy @timstclair @igorpeshansky @qingling128 @dhrupadb
**Release note:**
```release-note
Fluentd-gcp containers spawned by DaemonSet are now configured using ConfigMap
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Cleanup fluentd-gcp image, rebase on debian-base
**Why we need this PR**:
There are several problems with our current fluentd-gcp image:
- It pulls in lots of unused packages, which expose unnecessary risk and create noise in CVE scans (and scare customers). The most notable example is the fluent-ui, which pulls in rails.
- `curl | sh ` is not a good practice for a Dockerfile. First, the script is not checked in the same source control branch, so builds are not reproducible. Second, the actions it is taking are opaque. Third, in this case, using non-standard packages means they're harder to manage with CVE scans & upstream fixes.
**What is changed by this PR?**
- Rather than relying on td-agent (which includes fluent-ui), use standard upstream packages. This is largely based off the [official fluentd debian-based image](https://github.com/fluent/fluentd-docker-image/blob/master/v0.12/debian/Dockerfile).
- Rebases the image on debian-base (depends on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41915). We would like to move towards a single full-distro base image we can maintain. This change should be relatively minor.
As a result of these changes, the image size is reduced from 360.6 MB to 185.8 MB (nearly half). Many packages were removed, and the full diff (focus on the unversioned files) is listed here: 3fb704f977
**Which issue this PR fixes** https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40248
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This change both addresses security concerns, and is expected to greatly reduce the maintenance burden of the fluentd-gcp image. I'd *really* like to get this into 1.6, so please prioritize this review if possible.
I tested this by running the default e2e suite on a private e2e cluster using the new image. If there are other tests you'd like me to run, please let me know ASAP.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Cleanup fluentd-gcp image: rebase on debian-base, switch to upstream packages, remove fluent-ui & rails
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39855, 41433, 41567, 41887, 41652)
Add fluentd monitoring to fluentd-gcp image
Right now we are not able to monitor the state of fluentd in cluster, which may result in logging subsystem quietly failing. This PR tries to address that problem by introducing the fluentd container monitoring:
* fluentd internal metrics, like number of buffers and number of data in buffers
* `logging_line_count`, number of lines, read by fluentd from application containers' logs
* Has `tag` label, corresponding to the fluentd tag of the entry
* `logging_entry_count`, number of entries, emitted to the output plugin
* With label `component` set to `container`, generated by application containers
* With label `component` set to `system`, generated by system components like kubelet, docker, scheduler, etc.
* Has `tag` label, corresponding to the fluentd tag of the entry
CC @fabxc @igorpeshansky @edsiper
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Bump fluentd-gcp google_cloud plugin version
Bump the version of `fluent-plugin-google-cloud` in fluentd-gcp image, because it's broken for version `0.5.2`.
Recently, gem `google-api-client` was updated to version `0.10.0`. The new version broke `fluent-plugin-google-cloud` which doesn't specify the upper version of `google-api-client` gem. I'm bumping the version used in our image to allow future changes in this release to be run and tested.
This PR doesn't bump the version, since no effective changes has happened, leaving this for the next PR to do.
CC @igorpeshansky
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40000, 41508, 41489)
Add toleration to fluentd daemonset to make it run on master
Because of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41172 fluentd pods stopped being allocated on master node.
This PR introduces toleration for master taint for fluentd.
CC @davidopp @janetkuo @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-bugs
Unfortunately, we don't have e2e tests to ensure that master logs are being ingested. This problem is a great signal to work on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41411
These files have been created lately, so we don't have much information
about them anyway, so let's just:
- Remove assignees and make them approvers
- Copy approves as reviewers
Jeff Grafton