Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Update volume OWNERS to reflect active sig-storage reviewers
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Update sig-storage reviewers to add new members and remove those that don't have as much time to review storage PRs. Approvers are unchanged.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
For all those that have been removed, please approve. If you want to remain as a reviewer, let me know and I will add you back.
**Release note**:
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Switch from package syscall to golang.org/x/sys/unix
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The syscall package is locked down and the comment in https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/src/syscall/syscall.go#L21-L24 advises to switch code to use the corresponding package from golang.org/x/sys. This PR does so and replaces usage of package syscall with package golang.org/x/sys/unix where applicable. This will also allow to get updates and fixes
without having to use a new go version.
In order to get the latest functionality, golang.org/x/sys/ is re-vendored. This also allows to use Eventfd() from this package instead of calling the eventfd() C function.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This follows previous works in other Go projects, see e.g. moby/moby#33399, cilium/cilium#588
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
The syscall package is locked down and the comment in [1] advises to
switch code to use the corresponding package from golang.org/x/sys. Do
so and replace usage of package syscall with package
golang.org/x/sys/unix where applicable.
[1] https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/src/syscall/syscall.go#L21-L24
This will also allow to get updates and fixes for syscall wrappers
without having to use a new go version.
Errno, Signal and SysProcAttr aren't changed as they haven't been
implemented in /x/sys/. Stat_t from syscall is used if standard library
packages (e.g. os) require it. syscall.SIGTERM is used for
cross-platform files.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix comments and typo in the error message
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR fixes outdated comments and typo in the error message.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
CC @simo5
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/volume
cc @jsafrane @spothanis @agonzalezro @justinsb @johscheuer @simonswine @nelcy @pmorie @quofelix @sdminonne @thockin @saad-ali @rootfs
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Jeff Grafton