Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use namespace from context
Fixes#42653
Updates rbac_test.go to submit objects without namespaces set, which matches how actual objects are submitted to the API.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41984, 41682, 41924, 41928)
RC/RS: Fully Respect ControllerRef
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is part of the completion of the [ControllerRef](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md) proposal. It brings ReplicaSet and ReplicationController into full compliance with ControllerRef. See the individual commit messages for details.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Although RC/RS had partially implemented ControllerRef, they didn't use it to determine which controller to sync, or to update expectations. This could lead to instability or controllers getting stuck.
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24433
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
cc @erictune @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41597, 42185, 42075, 42178, 41705)
auto discovery CA for extension API servers
This is what the smaller pulls were leading to. Only the last commit is unique and I expect I'll still tweak some pod definitions, but this is where I was going.
@sttts @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42200, 39535, 41708, 41487, 41335)
Add support for statefulset spreading to the scheduler
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The scheduler SelectorSpread priority funtion didn't have the code to spread pods of StatefulSets. This PR adds StatefulSets to the list of controllers that SelectorSpread supports.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#41513
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add the support to the scheduler for spreading pods of StatefulSets.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
clean up generic apiserver options
Clean up generic apiserver options before we tag any levels. This makes them more in-line with "normal" api servers running on the platform.
Also remove dead example code.
@sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41954, 40528, 41875, 41165, 41877)
Updating apiserver to return 202 when resource is being deleted asynchronously via cascading deletion
As per https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/33196#issuecomment-278440622.
cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews @smarterclayton @caesarxuchao @bgrant0607 @kubernetes/api-reviewers
```release-note
Updating apiserver to return http status code 202 for a delete request when the resource is not immediately deleted because of user requesting cascading deletion using DeleteOptions.OrphanDependents=false.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41701, 41818, 41897, 41119, 41562)
Optimization of on-wire information sent to scheduler extender interfaces that are stateful
The changes are to address the issue described in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40991
```release-note
Added support to minimize sending verbose node information to scheduler extender by sending only node names and expecting extenders to cache the rest of the node information
```
cc @ravigadde
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41854, 41801, 40088, 41590, 41911)
Add storage.k8s.io/v1 API
v1 API is direct copy of v1beta1 API. This v1 API gets installed and exposed in this PR, I tested that kubectl can create both v1beta1 and v1 StorageClass.
~~Rest of Kubernetes (controllers, examples,. tests, ...) still use v1beta1 API, I will update it when this PR gets merged as these changes would get lost among generated code.~~ Most parts use v1 API now, it would not compile / run tests without it.
**Release note**:
```
Kubernetes API storage.k8s.io for storage objects is now fully supported and is available as storage.k8s.io/v1. Beta version of the API storage.k8s.io/v1beta1 is still available in this release, however it will be removed in a future Kubernetes release.
Together with the API endpoint, StorageClass annotation "storageclass.beta.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" is deprecated and "storageclass.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" should be used instead to mark a default storage class. The beta annotation is still working in this release, however it won't be supported in the next one.
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41714, 41510, 42052, 41918, 31515)
Switch scheduler to use generated listers/informers
Where possible, switch the scheduler to use generated listers and
informers. There are still some places where it probably makes more
sense to use one-off reflectors/informers (listing/watching just a
single node, listing/watching scheduled & unscheduled pods using a field
selector).
I think this can wait until master is open for 1.7 pulls, given that we're close to the 1.6 freeze.
After this and #41482 go in, the only code left that references legacylisters will be federation, and 1 bit in a stateful set unit test (which I'll clean up in a follow-up).
@resouer I imagine this will conflict with your equivalence class work, so one of us will be doing some rebasing 😄
cc @wojtek-t @gmarek @timothysc @jayunit100 @smarterclayton @deads2k @liggitt @sttts @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41667, 41820, 40910, 41645, 41361)
Switch admission to use shared informers
Originally part of #40097
cc @smarterclayton @derekwaynecarr @deads2k @liggitt @sttts @gmarek @wojtek-t @timothysc @lavalamp @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
node cache don't need to get all the information about every
candidate node. For huge clusters, sending full node information
of all nodes in the cluster on the wire every time a pod is scheduled
is expensive. If the scheduler is capable of caching node information
along with its capabilities, sending node name alone is sufficient.
These changes provide that optimization in a backward compatible way
- removed the inadvertent signature change of Prioritize() function
- added defensive checks as suggested
- added annotation specific test case
- updated the comments in the scheduler types
- got rid of apiVersion thats unused
- using *v1.NodeList as suggested
- backing out pod annotation update related changes made in the
1st commit
- Adjusted the comments in types.go and v1/types.go as suggested
in the code review
Where possible, switch the scheduler to use generated listers and
informers. There are still some places where it probably makes more
sense to use one-off reflectors/informers (listing/watching just a
single node, listing/watching scheduled & unscheduled pods using a field
selector).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41421, 41440, 36765, 41722)
Use watch param instead of deprecated /watch/ prefix
Switches clients to use watch param instead of /watch/ prefix
```release-note
Clients now use the `?watch=true` parameter to make watch API calls, instead of the `/watch/` path prefix
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41401, 41195, 41664, 41521, 41651)
Remove default failure domains from anti-affinity feature
Removing it is necessary to make performance of this feature acceptable at some point.
With default failure domains (or in general when multiple topology keys are possible), we don't have transitivity between node belonging to a topology. And without this, it's pretty much impossible to solve this effectively.
@timothysc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41604, 41273, 41547)
Switch pv controller to shared informer
This is WIP because I still need to do something with bazel? and add 'get storageclasses' to the controller-manager rbac role
@jsafrane PTAL and make sure I did not break anything in the PV controller. Do we need to clone the volumes/claims we get from the shared informer before we use them? I could not find a place where we modify them but you would know for certain.
cc @ncdc because I copied what you did in your other PRs.