Automatic merge from submit-queue
kube-apiserver: tests for aggregation and CRDs via delegation
In our integration tests we do not use the real kube-apiserver setup code, but mock our own. Here I use the actual `cmd/kube-apiserver/app.Run()` func with an testing etcd server. This can test the whole delegation chain of aggregator, apiextensions and kube-apiserver.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47232, 48625, 48613, 48567, 39173)
Include leaderelection in client-go;
Fix#39117
Fix https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go/issues/28
This PR:
* includes the leaderelection to the staging client-go
* to avoid conflict with golang's testing package, renames package /testing to /testutil, and renames cache/testing to cache/testframework
```release-note
client-go now includes the leaderelection package
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47232, 48625, 48613, 48567, 39173)
Make kube-proxy's MetricsBindAddress configurable via flag
**What this PR does / why we need it**: From #48600, `MetricsBindAddress` used to be configurable through flag (coupled with `HealthzBindAddress`). But this functionality went away after #44968 separated healthz server from metrics server. This PR adds that functionality back.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @ncdc
cc @bowei @r0bj
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Removed mesos as cloud provider from Kubernetes.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#47205
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Move Mesos Cloud Provider out of Kubernetes Repo
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48196, 42783, 48507, 47719, 46138)
kubeadm: Allows to use versions like 1.6.4 instead v1.6.4
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As part of issue kubernetes/kubeadm#292 discussion, it
turned out that for users it is not always obvious that
version specification parameter must be in form "vX.Y.Z".
This patch allows to specify it in form "X.Y.Z" and
converts it internally to normal semantic version which
expected in the rest of the code.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
- kubeadm now can accept versions like "1.6.4" where previously it strictly required "v1.6.4"
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48196, 42783, 48507, 47719, 46138)
add extra args validate
`ExtraArgsCheck` return warnings not errors. because kubeadm may create the newer version control plane, there are new arguments that kubeadm doesn't know.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Implementing the certificates phase fully
**What this PR does / why we need it:**
This contains implementation of certs phases in kubeadm, which is part of the wider effort of implementing phases in kubeadm, previously in alpha stage.
The original proposal for this activity can be found [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/pull/156/files) and related comments.
Kubeadm phase implementation checklist is defined [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/267)
Common implementation guidelines and principles for all phases are defined [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VQMyFIVMfRGQPP3oCUpfjiWtOr3pLxp4g7cP-hXQFXc/edit?usp=sharing)
This PR implements:
- [x] kubeadm phase certs
- [x] kubeadm phase certs all
- [x] kubeadm phase certs ca
- [x] kubeadm phase certs apiserver
- [x] kubeadm phase certs apiserver-kubelet-client
- [x] kubeadm phase certs sa
- [x] kubeadm phase certs front-proxy-ca
- [x] kubeadm phase certs front-proxy-client
**Which issue this PR fixes:**
none
**Special notes for your reviewer:**
This PR resubmits the work of #45617, and already includes @luxas reviews.
Please note that:
- the API - phase\certs.go - is now totally free by any UX concerns, and implements only the core logic for cert generation.
- the UX - cmd\phase\certs.go - now takes charge of UX commands and kubeadm own's rules for placing certs in the certificate dir (e.g. create only if exists)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
controller-manager: fix horizontal-pod-autoscaler-use-rest-clients fl…
…ag help info
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48497, 48604, 48599, 48560, 48546)
remove dead code
This removes the dead code cruft since we stopped serving TPRs.
ref #48152
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48374, 48524, 48519, 42548, 48615)
Kubelet run() should accept partial KubeletDeps
This is used by integrators that want to perform partial overrides of
key interfaces. Refactors the run() method to fit the existing style and
preserve the existing behavior, but allow (for instance) client
bootstrap and cert refresh even when some dependencies are injected.
@derekwaynecarr hit while reviewing client bootstrap code
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48518, 48525, 48269)
Move the kubelet certificate management code into a single package
Code is very similar and belongs together. Will allow future cert callers to potentially make this more generic, as well as to make it easier reuse code elsewhere.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47435, 46044)
kubeadm: Make self-hosting work and split it out to a phase
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Removes the old self-hosting code
- Puts the new self-hosting code in `phases/selfhosting`
- The new code reads manifests from disk (static pods)...
- ...mutates the PodSpec as necessary...
- ...and posts the DaemonSet to the API Server...
- ...and waits for it to come up
- Uses DaemonSets for all control plane components
- Creates a `kubeadm alpha phase selfhosting` command that can be invoked against any kubeadm-cluster after install.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
fixes: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/127
(large part of at least)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Please only review the fourth commit, based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/47345
**Release note**:
```release-note
kubeadm: Make self-hosting work by using DaemonSets and split it out to a phase that can be invoked via the CLI
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @jbeda
This is used by integrators that want to perform partial overrides of
key interfaces. Refactors the run() method to fit the existing style and
preserve the existing behavior, but allow (for instance) client
bootstrap and cert refresh even when some dependencies are injected.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add node-name flag to `join` phase
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Allow to specify a node-name instead of relaying in `os.Hostname()`
This is useful where kubelet use the name given by the cloud-provider to
register the node.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: partially fixeskubernetes/kubeadm#64
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Added new flag to `kubeadm join`: --node-name, that lets you specify the name of the Node object that's gonna be created
```
Allow to specify a node-name instead of relaying in `os.Hostname()`
This is useful where kubelet use the name given by the cloud-provider to
register the node.
Partially fix: kubernetes/kubeadm#64
As part of issue kubernetes/kubeadm#292 discussion, it
turned out that for users it is not always obvious that
version specification parameter must be in form "vX.Y.Z".
This patch allows to specify it in form "X.Y.Z" and
converts it internally to normal semantic version which
expected in the rest of the code.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48480, 48353)
remove tpr api access
xref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48152
TPR tentacles go pretty deep. This gets us started by removing API access and we'll move down from there.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
@ironcladlou this should free up the GC implementation since TPRs will no longer be present and failing.
```release-note
Removing TPR api access per https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48152
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48473, 48341)
remove redundant alias
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
remove redundant alias
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46928, 47345)
kubeadm: Move directory ./master to ./phases/controlplane
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Moves app/master into phases/controlplane. It should be in the phases directory, was just overlooked earlier
- Harmonizes the import names in phases/controlplane with the similar import names in cmd/kubeadm
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Please review only second and third commit, based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/47339
Targets v1.8
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @timothysc @pipejakob
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add timothysc to kubeadm reviewers
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds timothysc to kubeadm reviewers b/c I'm working on it this cycle.
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove old node role label that is not used by kubeadm
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This label hasn't been used by kubeadm since v1.5.
v1.5 support was dropped when v1.6 arrived due to a potential security flaw and the earlier alpha status.
So this label hasn't been used for around three months.
It makes sense to remove it in time for v1.8, could already have been done for v1.7
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48264, 48324, 48125, 47944, 47489)
remove unneeded variable
Signed-off-by: Ma Shimiao <mashimiao.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
small fix, remove unneeded variable
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: If `--config` is set, don't allow any other option as it won't have effect
If use config in kubeadm init, cann't get other values from other arguments.
`kubeadm init --config=../kubeadm.config --token 447ad3.96cda76e3206fca0 --apiserver-bind-port 6445`
So I think we need to allow get values from command and is prior than cofig file.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48295, 48298, 47339, 44910, 48037)
kubeadm: Remove v1.6 version gates, cleanup unused code, etc.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Removes v1.6 version gates and requires a control plane version of v1.7.0 and above
- Removes unused/unnecessary functions that got freed up as a consequence of that
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Fixes: kubernetes/kubeadm#327
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This PR targets v1.8, can be merged first when the code freeze is lifted
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @timothysc @mikedanese @pipejakob
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix kube-proxy panic when running with "--cleanup-iptables=true"
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Save the `--cleanup-iptables` config for new ProxyServer when it's true.
Also check if Broadcaster and EventClient are nil to avoid other potential panic.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#48177
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @ncdc @irake99
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Start using Tolerations in yaml code again and unit-test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Earlier there was a problem with decoding Tolerations from yaml. Seems to be fixed now.
- Added an unit test to catch such a failure if that regression ever happens again
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Targets v1.8
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @timothysc
Kubernetes Submit Queue