Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>..
bazel: build/test almost everything
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Miscellaneous cleanups and bug fixes. The main motivating idea here was to make `bazel build //...` and `bazel test //...` mostly work. (There's a few reasons these still don't work, but we're a lot closer.)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @BenTheElder @mikedanese @spxtr
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove deprecated init-container in annotations
fixes#50655fixes#51816closes#41004fixes#51816
Builds on #50654 and drops the initContainer annotations on conversion to prevent bypassing API server validation/security and targeting version-skewed kubelets that still honor the annotations
```release-note
The deprecated alpha and beta initContainer annotations are no longer supported. Init containers must be specified using the initContainers field in the pod spec.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51819, 51706, 51761, 51818, 51500)
fix kube-proxy panic because of nil sessionAffinityConfig
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix kube-proxy panic because of nil sessionAffinityConfig
**Which issue this PR fixes**: closes#51499
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I apology that this bug is introduced by #49850 :(
@thockin @smarterclayton @gnufied
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50919, 51410, 50099, 51300, 50296)
Take mount options to GA by adding PV.spec.mountOptions
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Implements https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/771
issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/168
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
TODO:
- ~StorageClass mountOptions~
As described in proposal, this adds PV.spec.mountOptions + mountOptions parameter to every plugin that is both provisionable & supports mount options.
(personally, even having done all the work already, i don't agree w/ the proposal that mountOptions should be SC parameter but... :))
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add mount options field to PersistentVolume spec
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51471, 50561, 50435, 51473, 51436)
Add local storage to downwards API
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add local ephemeral storage to downward API
```
/assign @NickrenREN
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49861, 50933, 51380, 50688, 51305)
fix v1 validation return error
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#51304
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove null -> [] slice hack
Closes#44593
When 1.6 added protobuf storage, the storage layer lost the ability to persist slice fields with empty but non-null values.
As a workaround, we tried to convert empty slice fields to `[]`, rather than `null`. Compressing `null` -> `[]` was just as much of an API breakage as `[]` -> `null`, but was hoped to cause fewer problems in clients that don't do null checks.
Because of conversion optimizations around converting lists of objects, the `null` -> `[]` hack was discovered to only apply to individual get requests, not to a list of objects. 1.6 and 1.7 was released with this behavior, and the world didn't explode. 1.7 documented the breaking API change that `null` and `[]` should be considered equivalent, unless otherwise noted on a particular field.
This PR:
* Reverts the earlier attempt (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/43422) at ensuring non-null json slice output in conversion
* Makes results of `get` consistent with the results of `list` (which helps naive clients that do deepequal comparisons of objects obtained via list/watch and get), and allows empty slice fields to be returned as `null`
```release-note
Protobuf serialization does not distinguish between `[]` and `null`.
API fields previously capable of storing and returning either `[]` and `null` via JSON API requests (for example, the Endpoints `subsets` field) can now store only `null` when created using the protobuf content-type or stored in etcd using protobuf serialization (the default in 1.6+). JSON API clients should tolerate `null` values for such fields, and treat `null` and `[]` as equivalent in meaning unless specifically documented otherwise for a particular field.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50889, 51347, 50582, 51297, 51264)
support fieldSelector spec.schedulerName
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#49190
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @davidopp @bsalamat
/cc @lavalamp
**Release note**:
```release-note
add fieldSelector spec.schedulerName
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49850, 47782, 50595, 50730, 51341)
Paramaterize `stickyMaxAgeMinutes` for service in API
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Currently I find `stickyMaxAgeMinutes` for a session affinity type service is hard code to 180min. There is a TODO comment, see
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/proxy/iptables/proxier.go#L205
I think the seesion sticky max time varies from service to service and users may not aware of it since it's hard coded in all proxier.go - iptables, userspace and winuserspace.
Once we parameterize it in API, users can set/get the values for their different services.
Perhaps, we can introduce a new field `api.ClientIPAffinityConfig` in `api.ServiceSpec`.
There is an initial discussion about it in sig-network group. See,
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/kubernetes-sig-network/i-LkeHrjs80
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
fixes#49831
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Paramaterize session affinity timeout seconds in service API for Client IP based session affinity.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51114, 51233, 51024, 51053, 51197)
default field selectors
We have a lot of code around field selectors that doesn't add much value. Every gettable resources probably wants name and namespace by default and since they all use metav1 (today), we can assign that as a default. If we think we'll always have metav1 style name and namespace, then this makes a reasonable default and you can always set something different.
This removes cruft and avoids the risk of accidentally forgetting a field selector.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @smarterclayton
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51113, 46597, 50397, 51052, 51166)
implement proposal 34058: hostPath volume type
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
implement proposal #34058
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes#46549
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
cc @thockin @luxas @euank PTAL
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50257, 50247, 50665, 50554, 51077)
Replace hard-code "cpu" and "memory" to consts
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There are many places using hard coded "cpu" and "memory" as resource name. This PR replace them to consts.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/kind cleanup
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46512, 50146)
Make metav1.(Micro)?Time functions take pointers
Is there any reason for those functions not to be on pointers?
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46317, 48922, 50651, 50230, 47599)
Resources outside the `*kubernetes.io` namespace are integers and cannot be over-committed.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fixes#50473
Rationale: since the scheduler handles all resources except CPU as integers, that could just be the default behavior for namespaced resources.
cc @RenaudWasTaken @vishh
**Release note**:
```release-note
Resources outside the `*kubernetes.io` namespace are integers and cannot be over-committed.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove deprecated ESIPP beta annotations
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Remove deprecated ESIPP beta annotations.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#50187
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @MrHohn
/sig network
**Release note**:
```release-note
Beta annotations `service.beta.kubernetes.io/external-traffic` and `service.beta.kubernetes.io/healthcheck-nodeport` have been removed. Please use fields `service.spec.externalTrafficPolicy` and `service.spec.healthCheckNodePort` instead.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49651, 49707, 49662, 47019, 49747)
Add support for `no_new_privs` via AllowPrivilegeEscalation
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Implements kubernetes/community#639
Fixes#38417
Adds `AllowPrivilegeEscalation` and `DefaultAllowPrivilegeEscalation` to `PodSecurityPolicy`.
Adds `AllowPrivilegeEscalation` to container `SecurityContext`.
Adds the proposed behavior to `kuberuntime`, `dockershim`, and `rkt`. Adds a bunch of unit tests to ensure the desired default behavior and that when `DefaultAllowPrivilegeEscalation` is explicitly set.
Tests pass locally with docker and rkt runtimes. There are also a few integration tests with a `setuid` binary for sanity.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Adds AllowPrivilegeEscalation to control whether a process can gain more privileges than it's parent process
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49286, 49550)
Remove myself from a bunch of places
I am assigned in reviews which I never get to do. I prefer drive-bys whenever I can do them rather than the bot choosing myself in random, ends up being mere spam.
@smarterclayton please approve.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48636, 49088, 49251, 49417, 49494)
[nit] Rename pkg/api/v1/builder.go to register.go to be consistent with others
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49420, 49296, 49299, 49371, 46514)
Refactoring taint functions to reduce sprawl
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#45060
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@gmarek @timothysc @k82cn @jayunit100 - I moved some fn's to helpers and some to utils. LMK, if you are ok with this change.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49116, 49095)
Move pkg/api/v1/ref -> client-go/tools/reference
`pkg/api/v1/ref` is the only remaining package copied from pkg/api/v1 to client-go via staging/copy.sh.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48264, 48324, 48125, 47944, 47489)
Add Pod UID (metadata.uid) to downward API env var
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Exposing Pod UID by downward API.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#28918
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Generated files aren't committed. I'd like CI to tell me what scripts should I run to generate these files.
/cc @smarterclayton @vishh @dubstack
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix api description
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
prefered -> preferred
the the -> the
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Allow pods to opt out of PodPreset mutation via an annotation on the pod
An annotation in the pod spec of the form:
podpreset.admission.kubernetes.io/PodPresetOptOut: "true"
Will cause the admission controller to skip manipulating the pod spec,
no matter the labelling.
This is an alternative implementation to pull #44163.
```release-note
Allow pods to opt out of PodPreset mutation via an annotation on the pod.
```
Dr. Stefan Schimanski