Commit Graph

2629 Commits (2eb1083b9bcfbd118118f361169b327913d0d128)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kubernetes Submit Queue 695d4fb584
Merge pull request #66684 from deads2k/rbac-01-aggregate
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65730, 66615, 66684, 66519, 66510). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

aggregate admin from edit and view to ensure coverage

ClusterRole aggregate has worked quite well.  This updates the edit role to be aggregated from a separate edit and view and updates the admin role to aggregated from admin, edit, and view.  This ensures coverage (we previously had unit tests, but that didn't work as people aggregated more powers in) and it makes each role smaller since it only has a diff to consider.

@kubernetes/sig-auth-pr-reviews 

```release-note
admin RBAC role now aggregates edit and view.  edit RBAC role now aggregates view. 
```
2018-08-01 15:52:13 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 14ee31b7e3
Merge pull request #66014 from yue9944882/cleanup-podpreset-unused-methods
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Clean up podpreset admission controller unused methods

**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As the title.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```
2018-07-31 10:49:57 -07:00
stewart-yu f1343af5d7 auto-generated file 2018-07-28 07:54:17 +08:00
stewart-yu 55251c716a update the import file for move util/pointer to k8s.io/utils 2018-07-27 19:47:02 +08:00
David Eads 3c1495d0a4 aggregate admin from edit and view to ensure coverage 2018-07-26 15:14:34 -04:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 8770d12494
Merge pull request #65572 from yue9944882/fixes-admission-operation-mismatch-for-create-on-update
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

fixes operation for "create on update"

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

Set operation to `admission.Create` for create-on-update requests.

**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #65553

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

**Release note**:

```release-note
Checks CREATE admission for create-on-update requests instead of UPDATE admission
```
2018-07-19 10:42:54 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue d2cc34fb07
Merge pull request #65771 from smarterclayton/untyped
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65771, 65849). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Add a new conversion path to replace GenericConversionFunc

reflect.Call is very expensive. We currently use a switch block as part of AddGenericConversionFunc to avoid the bulk of top level a->b conversion for our primary types which is hand-written. Instead of having these be handwritten, we should generate them.

The pattern for generating them looks like:

```
scheme.AddConversionFunc(&v1.Type{}, &internal.Type{}, func(a, b interface{}, scope conversion.Scope) error {
  return Convert_v1_Type_to_internal_Type(a.(*v1.Type), b.(*internal.Type), scope)
})
```

which matches AddDefaultObjectFunc (which proved out the approach last year). The
conversion machinery should then do a simple map lookup based on the incoming types and invoke the function.  Like defaulting, it's up to the caller to match the types to arguments, which we do by generating this code.  This bypasses reflect.Call and in the future allows Golang mid-stack inlining to optimize this code.

As part of this change I strengthened registration of custom functions to be generated instead of hand registered, and also strengthened error checking of the generator when it sees a manual conversion to error out.  Since custom functions are automatically used by the generator, we don't really have a case for not registering the functions.

Once this is fully tested out, we can remove the reflection based path and the old registration methods, and all conversion will work from point to point methods (whether generated or custom).

Much of the need for the reflection path has been removed by changes to generation (to omit fields) and changes to Go (to make assigning equivalent structs easy).

```release-note
NONE
```
2018-07-19 09:29:00 -07:00
Tim Allclair 5ace0f03d8
Cleanup & fix PodSecurityPolicy field path usage 2018-07-18 17:47:32 -07:00
Clayton Coleman ef561ba8b5
generated: Avoid use of reflect.Call in conversion code paths 2018-07-17 23:02:16 -04:00
Russ Cox 2bd91dda64 kubernetes: fix printf format errors
These are all flagged by Go 1.11's
more accurate printf checking in go vet,
which runs as part of go test.

Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
applied ammend for:
  pkg/cloudprovider/provivers/vsphere/nodemanager.go
2018-07-11 00:10:15 +03:00
yue9944882 ccb1ec7a36 fixes operation for "create on update"
remove create-on-update logic for quota controller

review: add more error check

remove unused args

revert changes in patch.go

use hasUID to judge if it's a create-on-update
2018-07-10 17:22:09 +08:00
yue9944882 126716287b clean ups 2018-07-10 17:08:35 +08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 349d6a62db
Merge pull request #64226 from ddebroy/ddebroy-affinity1
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64226, 65880). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Populate NodeAffinity on top of labels for cloud based PersistentVolumes

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

This PR populates the NodeAffinity field (on top of the existing labels) for PVs backed by cloud providers like EC2 EBS and GCE PD.

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Related to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63232

Sample `describe pv` output for EBS with node affinity field populated:
```
kubectl describe pv pv0001
Name:              pv0001
Labels:            failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region=us-west-2
                   failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone=us-west-2a
Annotations:       <none>
Finalizers:        [kubernetes.io/pv-protection]
StorageClass:      
Status:            Available
Claim:             
Reclaim Policy:    Retain
Access Modes:      RWO
Capacity:          5Gi
Node Affinity:     
  Required Terms:  
    Term 0:        failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone in [us-west-2a]
                   failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region in [us-west-2]
Message:           
Source:
    Type:       AWSElasticBlockStore (a Persistent Disk resource in AWS)
    VolumeID:   vol-00cf03a068c62cbe6
    FSType:     ext4
    Partition:  0
    ReadOnly:   false
Events:         <none>
```

/sig storage
/assign @msau42

**Release note**:
```NONE```
2018-07-09 12:16:02 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt 1c012f1c49
Improve multi-authorizer errors 2018-07-06 10:55:17 -04:00
Jordan Liggitt bfd966c4c2
update priority admission for interoperability 2018-07-03 10:43:35 -04:00
Bobby (Babak) Salamat a1472459a5 Addressed reviewers comments 2018-06-29 10:22:11 -07:00
Bobby (Babak) Salamat 28df1f0d0c Autogenerated files 2018-06-28 17:43:30 -07:00
Bobby (Babak) Salamat 1ce7585924 Limit usage of system critical priority classes to the system namespace 2018-06-28 17:43:30 -07:00
Deep Debroy 074dc6487b Populate NodeAffinity on top of labels for cloud based PersistentVolumes
Signed-off-by: Deep Debroy <ddebroy@docker.com>
2018-06-26 19:48:03 -07:00
Jeff Grafton 23ceebac22 Run hack/update-bazel.sh 2018-06-22 16:22:57 -07:00
Jeff Grafton a725660640 Update to gazelle 0.12.0 and run hack/update-bazel.sh 2018-06-22 16:22:18 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue f7de67a191
Merge pull request #64598 from MikeSpreitzer/fix-63608-b
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65152, 65199, 65179, 64598, 65216). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Remove optimization from getWork in resourcequota/controller.go

**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This change simplifies the code in
plugin/pkg/admission/resourcequota/controller.go by removing the
optimization in getWork that required the caller to NOT call
completeWork if getWork returns the empty list of work.  BTW, the
caller was not obeying that requirement; now the caller's behavior
(which is unchanged) is right.

**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #63608 

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is a simpler alternative to #64377 

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```
2018-06-21 18:20:15 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 83633d5bc3
Merge pull request #64837 from liggitt/mirror-pod-node-authorizer-graph
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65254, 64837, 64782, 64555, 64850). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Short-circuit node authorizer graph edges for mirror pods

When building the graph of resources allowed to a node by a given pod, short-circuit adding edges to other resources for mirror pods. A node must never be able to create a pod that grants them permissions on other API objects. The NodeRestriction admission plugin prevents creation of such pods, but short-circuiting here gives us defense in depth.

/assign @tallclair
/sig auth

```release-note
NONE
```
2018-06-20 11:28:09 -07:00
David Zhu 86e152dc3f Added PV GET api rule to external-provisioner 2018-06-13 14:49:58 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt c8a0f52d5d
Short-circuit node authorizer graph edges for mirror pods 2018-06-06 11:34:14 -04:00
Jan Chaloupka 3cc15363bc Run make update 2018-06-06 00:12:40 +02:00
Jan Chaloupka ab616a88b9 Promote sysctl annotations to API fields 2018-06-05 23:17:00 +02:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue c178c7fd65
Merge pull request #62005 from mikedanese/svcacctproj
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

implement ServiceAccountTokenProjection

design here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/1973

part of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/61858

```release-note
Add a volume projection that is able to project service account tokens.
```

part of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48408

@kubernetes/sig-auth-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
2018-06-05 09:30:56 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 0647cff9ff
Merge pull request #64386 from andyzhangx/azuredisk-sizegrow
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Add azuredisk PV size grow feature

**What this PR does / why we need it**:
According to kubernetes/features#284, add size grow feature for azure disk

**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #56463

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
 - This feature is ony for azure managed disk, and if that disk is already attached to a running VM, disk resize will fail as following:
```
$ kubectl describe pvc pvc-azuredisk
Events:
  Type     Reason              Age               From           Message
  ----     ------              ----              ----           -------
  Warning  VolumeResizeFailed  51s (x3 over 3m)  volume_expand  Error expanding volume "default/pvc-azuredisk" of plugin kubernetes.io/azure-disk : disk.DisksClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure responding to request: StatusCode=409 -- Original Error: autorest/azure: Service returned an error. Status=409 Code="OperationNotAllowed" Message="Cannot resize disk andy-mg1102-dynamic-pvc-d2d00dd9-6185-11e8-a6c3-000d3a0643a8 while it is attached to running VM /subscriptions/.../resourceGroups/.../providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/k8s-agentpool-17607330-0."
```

**How to use this feature**
 - `kubectl edit pvc pvc-azuredisk` to change azuredisk PVC size from 6GB to 10GB
```
# Please edit the object below. Lines beginning with a '#' will be ignored,
# and an empty file will abort the edit. If an error occurs while saving this file will be
# reopened with the relevant failures.
#
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
metadata:
  annotations:
...
    volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-provisioner: kubernetes.io/azure-disk
  creationTimestamp: 2018-05-27T08:13:23Z
  finalizers:
  - kubernetes.io/pvc-protection
  name: pvc-azuredisk
...
spec:
  accessModes:
  - ReadWriteOnce
  resources:
    requests:
      storage: 6Gi
  storageClassName: hdd
  volumeMode: Filesystem
  volumeName: pvc-d2d00dd9-6185-11e8-a6c3-000d3a0643a8
status:
  accessModes:
  - ReadWriteOnce
  capacity:
    storage: 6Gi
  conditions:
  - lastProbeTime: null
    lastTransitionTime: 2018-05-27T08:14:34Z
    message: Waiting for user to (re-)start a pod to finish file system resize of
      volume on node.
    status: "True"
    type: FileSystemResizePending
  phase: Bound
```

 - After resized, `/mnt/disk` is still 6GB
```
$ kubectl exec -it nginx-azuredisk -- bash
# df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
...
/dev/sdf        5.8G   15M  5.5G   1% /mnt/disk
...
```

 - After user run `sudo resize2fs /dev/sdf` in agent node, `/mnt/disk` becomes 10GB now:
```
$ kubectl exec -it nginx-azuredisk -- bash
# df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
...
/dev/sdf        9.8G   16M  9.3G   1% /mnt/disk
...
```

**Release note**:

```
Add azuredisk size grow feature
```

/sig azure
/assign @feiskyer @karataliu @gnufied 
cc @khenidak
2018-06-05 00:02:34 -07:00
Mike Danese 91feb345aa implement service account token projection 2018-06-04 17:22:08 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 46d2b47156
Merge pull request #57963 from vikaschoudhary16/priorityclass
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Introduce priority class in the resource quota

**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Implements https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/933
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #48648 

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Test Cases are still to be covered. Opening this PR to make discussion convenient with code references.
Will update test cases only after design PR has got merged.

**Release note**:

```release-note
Ability to quota resources by priority
```
/kind feature
/priority important-soon
/sig scheduling
/sig node
/cc @resouer @derekwaynecarr @sjenning @bsalamat @timstclair @aveshagarwal @ravisantoshgudimetla
2018-06-04 15:11:00 -07:00
vikaschoudhary16 3cfe6412c7 Introduce priority class in the resource quota 2018-06-04 16:14:54 -04:00
Cao Shufeng 241422879d Log policy name from pod security policy 2018-06-04 19:24:25 +08:00
andyzhangx 880b7a3bda azuredisk size grow feature
fix comments

fix comments
2018-06-03 13:55:49 +00:00
Mike Spreitzer 640d5b7363 Remove optimization from getWork in resourcequota/controller.go
This change simplifies the code in
plugin/pkg/admission/resourcequota/controller.go by removing the
optimization in getWork that required the caller to NOT call
completeWork if getWork returns the empty list of work.  BTW, the
caller was not obeying that requirement; now the caller's behavior
(which is unchanged) is right.

Fixes #63608
2018-05-31 22:43:54 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue a1c8d3f5f3
Merge pull request #64403 from jsafrane/aws-read-only-attach
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 57082, 64325, 64016, 64443, 64403). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Allow AWS EBS volumes to be attached as ReadOnly.

**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**
Fixes #64402

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This follows logic e.g. in Cinder volume plugin.

**Release note**:

```release-note
AWS EBS volumes can be now used as ReadOnly in pods.
```

/sig storage
/sig aws
2018-05-30 18:49:23 -07:00
Minhan Xia 9fe2c53624 include patch permission for kubelets 2018-05-30 11:15:47 -07:00
Jan Safranek 8ff0fff065 Allow AWS EBS volumes to be attached as ReadOnly. 2018-05-28 16:24:19 +02:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 9872a0502b
Merge pull request #64288 from gnufied/take-volume-resize-beta
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Move volume resize feature to beta

Move volume resizing feature to beta. 

xref https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/284

```release-note
Move Volume expansion to Beta
```
2018-05-26 01:34:17 -07:00
Hemant Kumar 0dd6e75567 Move volume resizing to beta
Update bootstrap policies
2018-05-25 15:32:38 -04:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue a8cf18c0ae
Merge pull request #63232 from lichuqiang/provision_plumbing
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Volume topology aware dynamic provisioning: basic plumbing

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

Split PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63193 for better review
part 1: basic scheduler and controller plumbing

Next: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63233

**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** 
Feature: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/561
Design: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/issues/2168

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/sig storage
/sig scheduling
/assign @msau42 @jsafrane @saad-ali @bsalamat


**Release note**:

```release-note
Basic plumbing for volume topology aware dynamic provisioning
```
2018-05-25 07:58:53 -07:00
lichuqiang 95b530366a Add dynamic provisioning process 2018-05-24 17:12:38 +08:00
xuzhonghu 5caf141650 resourcequota return StatusError when timeout 2018-05-24 16:35:19 +08:00
David Eads 092714ea0f switch rbac to external 2018-05-22 08:17:05 -04:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue f86ec3f764
Merge pull request #63992 from mikedanese/owners
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

add mikedanese as an approver in various auth related directories

matching the [subprojects](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RJvnSPOJ3JC61gerCpCpaCtzQjRcsZ2tXkcyokr6sLY/edit) I work on.



```release-note
NONE
```
2018-05-17 15:47:33 -07:00
Mike Danese f39ec8b333 add myself as an approver in various auth related directories
matching the subprojects I work on:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RJvnSPOJ3JC61gerCpCpaCtzQjRcsZ2tXkcyokr6sLY/edit
2018-05-17 11:32:37 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue b3837d004a
Merge pull request #63469 from wojtek-t/allow_list_and_watch_secrets
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

Allow for listing & watching individual secrets from nodes

This PR:
- propagates value of `metadata.name` field from fieldSelector to `name` field in RequestInfo (for list and watch requests)
- authorizes list/watch for requests for single secrets/configmaps coming from nodes

As an example:
```
/api/v1/secrets/namespaces/ns?fieldSelector=metadata.name=foo =>
  requestInfo.Name = "foo",
  requestInfo.Verb = "list"
/api/v1/secrets/namespaces/ns?fieldSelector=metadata.name=foo&watch=true =>
  requestInfo.Name = "foo",
  requestInfo.Verb = "list"
```

```release-note
list/watch API requests with a fieldSelector that specifies `metadata.name` can now be authorized as requests for an individual named resource
```
2018-05-17 07:09:43 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt 15bcfd5e00
Prevent nodes from updating taints 2018-05-15 13:54:33 -04:00
wojtekt b2500d41e9 Fix bootstrap roles to allow list/watch secrets/configmaps from nodes 2018-05-15 14:19:21 +02:00
wojtekt f344c5c062 Requires single name for list and watch 2018-05-15 14:19:21 +02:00