export functions from pkg/api/validation
add settings API
add settings to pkg/registry
add settings api to pkg/master/master.go
add admission control plugin for pod preset
add new admission control plugin to kube-apiserver
add settings to import_known_versions.go
add settings to codegen
add validation tests
add settings to client generation
add protobufs generation for settings api
update linted packages
add settings to testapi
add settings install to clientset
add start of e2e
add pod preset plugin to config-test.sh
Signed-off-by: Jess Frazelle <acidburn@google.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41112, 41201, 41058, 40650, 40926)
Promote TokenReview to v1
Peer to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40709
We have multiple features that depend on this API:
- [webhook authentication](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authentication/#webhook-token-authentication)
- [kubelet delegated authentication](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/#kubelet-authentication)
- add-on API server delegated authentication
The API has been in use since 1.3 in beta status (v1beta1) with negligible changes:
- Added a status field for reporting errors evaluating the token
This PR promotes the existing v1beta1 API to v1 with no changes
Because the API does not persist data (it is a query/response-style API), there are no data migration concerns.
This positions us to promote the features that depend on this API to stable in 1.7
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-api-reviews @kubernetes/sig-auth-misc
```release-note
The authentication.k8s.io API group was promoted to v1
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Unable to have optional message slice
When making a message slice optional, we need to handle one more
conditional case in the rewriter.
@wojtek-t
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Generate a better Stringer method for proto types
This replaces the bad string output generated by golang/proto with gogo/protobuf stringer generation. Makes the output similar to %#v and more debuggable. We have to have a String() method to implement proto.Message, so this is strictly better.
@wojtek-t, @thockin for after your PR merges
Fixes#28756
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Allow proto tag to define field name
When we introduce a new field for backwards compatibility, we may want
to specify a different protobuf field name (one that matches JSON) than
the automatic transformation applied to the struct field. This allows an
API field to define the name of its protobuf tag.
@wojtek-t hit this while adding protobuf to OpenShift - we have fields we
keep for backward compatibility that need to be assigned a field by name.
Has no impact on existing (already tagged) fields.
When we introduce a new field for backwards compatibility, we may want
to specify a different protobuf field name (one that matches JSON) than
the automatic transformation applied to the struct field. This allows an
API field to define the name of its protobuf tag.
This means that tags like:
// +foo=bar
// +foo=bat
..will produce []string{"bar", "bat"}. This is needed for later commits which
will want to use this to make code generation more self contained.
deads2k