Automatic merge from submit-queue
AWS/GCE: Spread PetSet volume creation across zones, create GCE volumes in non-master zones
Long term we plan on integrating this into the scheduler, but in the
short term we use the volume name to place it onto a zone.
We hash the volume name so we don't bias to the first few zones.
If the volume name "looks like" a PetSet volume name (ending with
-<number>) then we use the number as an offset. In that case we hash
the base name.
Tested with 2000 nodes, this actually meets the GCE API specifications
(which is nutty). Previous PR (#25178) was based on a mistaken
understanding of a poorly documented set of limitations, and even
poorer testing, for which I am embarassed.
Lots of comments describing the heuristics, how it fits together and the
limitations.
In particular, we can't guarantee correct volume placement if the set of
zones is changing between allocating volumes.
Filters can't exceed 4k, and GET requests against the GCE API are also
limited, so these break down in different ways at different cluster
counts. Fix it by introducing an advisory node-instance-prefix
configuration in the GCE provider that can hint the
EnsureLoadBalancer/UpdateLoadBalancer code (and the firewall
creation/update code). If it's not there, or wrong (a hostname that's
registered violates it), just ignore it and grab the whole project.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
refuse to create a firewall rule with no target tag
fixes#25145
This modification in gce.firewallObject() will return error when trying
to create or update firewall rule if no node tag can be found. Also add
unit test for this modification.
We had a long-lasting bug which prevented creation of volumes in
non-master zones, because the cloudprovider in the volume label
admission controller is not initialized with the multizone setting
(issue #27656).
This implements a simple workaround: if the volume is created with the
failure-domain zone label, we look for the volume in that zone. This is
more efficient, avoids introducing a new semantic, and allows users (and
the dynamic provisioner) to create volumes in non-master zones.
Fixes#27657
Long term we plan on integrating this into the scheduler, but in the
short term we use the volume name to place it onto a zone.
We hash the volume name so we don't bias to the first few zones.
If the volume name "looks like" a PetSet volume name (ending with
-<number>) then we use the number as an offset. In that case we hash
the base name.
Fixes#27256
Implements #25145
This modification in gce.firewallObject() will return error when trying
to create or update firewall rule if no node tag can be found. Also add
unit test for this modification.
Instead of just rate limits to operation polling, send all API calls
through a rate limited RoundTripper.
This isn't a perfect solution, since the QPS is obviously getting
split between different controllers, etc., but it's also spread across
different APIs, which, in practice, rate limit differently.
Fixes#26119 (hopefully)
This is a better abstraction than passing in specific pieces of the
Service that each of the cloudproviders may or may not need. For
instance, many of the providers don't need a region, yet this is passed
in. Similarly many of the providers want a string IP for the load
balancer, but it passes in a converted net ip. Affinity is unused by
AWS. A provider change may also require adding a new parameter which has
an effect on all other cloud provider implementations.
Further, this will simplify adding provider specific load balancer
options, such as with labels or some other metadata. For example, we
could add labels for configuring the details of an AWS elastic load
balancer, such as idle timeout on connections, whether it is
internal or external, cross-zone load balancing, and so on.
Authors: @chbatey, @jsravn
Had to move other things around too to avoid a weird api ->
cloudprovider dependency.
Also adding fixes per code reviews.
(This is a squash of the previously approved commits)
This refactors #21431 to pull a lot of the code into cloudprovider so it
can be reused by AWS.
It also changes the name of the annotation to be non-GCE specific:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/load-balancer-source-ranges
Fix#21651
for Instance.List and Routes.List which we will definitely have
more than 500 of when supporting 1000 nodes.
Add TODOs for other GCE List API calls to do similar fixes.
Add more logging to GCE's routecontroller.go when creating or deleting routes.
Follow up from #20731. I have no way of testing this.
There's an additional group of functions (Get|Delete|Reserve)GlobalStaticIP that can create an IP without the
service description, but those are not called anywhere in the Kubernetes codebase and are probably for the
Ingress project. I'm leaving those alone for now.
David McMahon