Automatic merge from submit-queue
remove unneeded authenticator dependencies from genericapiserver
Refactors the authenticator options to remove unneeded dependencies.
@sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement kubeadm bootstrap token management
Creates bootstrap tokens as secrets per the specification in #30707
_WARNING_: These are not currently hooked up to the discovery service or the token it creates.
Still TODO:
- [x] delete tokens
- [x] merge with #35144 and adopt it's testing approach
- [x] determine if we want wholesale json output & templating like kubectl (we do not have an API object with the data we want here) may require a bit of plumbing.
- [x] allow specifying a token duration on the CLI
- [x] allow configuring the default token duration
- [x] hook up the initial token created during init
Sample output:
```
(root@centos1 ~) $ kubeadm token create
Running pre-flight checks
<cmd/token> Token secret created: f6dc69.c43e491752c4a0fd
(root@centos1 ~) $ kubeadm token create
Running pre-flight checks
<cmd/token> Token secret created: 8fad2f.e7b78c8a5f7c7b9a
(root@centos1 ~) $ kubeadm token list
Running pre-flight checks
ID TOKEN EXPIRATION
44d805 44d805.a4e78b6cf6435e33 23h
4f65bb 4f65bb.d006a3c7a0e428c9 23h
6a086e 6a086e.2ff99f0823236b5b 23h
8fad2f 8fad2f.e7b78c8a5f7c7b9a 23h
f6dc69 f6dc69.c43e491752c4a0fd 23h
f81653 f81653.9ab82a2926c7e985 23h
```
Adds kubeadm subcommands to create, list, and delete bootstrap tokens.
Tokens can be created with a TTL duration, or 0 for tokens that will not
expire. The create command can also be used to specify your own token
(for use when bootstrapping masters and nodes in parallel), or update an
existing token's secret or ttl.
Marked "ex" for experimental for now as the boostrap controllers are not
yet hooked up in core.
- move rest handler into handlers package
- move errors into handlers/errors package
- move negotation code into handlers/negotation package
- move http response writer helpers into handlers/responsewriter package
- split up pkg/apiserver/apiserver.go
Note: this is only an intermediate step towards a proper genericapiserver
package hierarchy.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
conversion-gen: add --skip-unsafe flag
We should expose the SkipUnsafe option, for legacy compatability, so
that conversion-go can be used in other projects, and for platforms
where unsafe is not available.
Make unsafe code generation the default though, and have the help text
hint that the resulting code is sub-optimal.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
path.Clean paths in GlobalEnvParams and remove unnecessary path.Join
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. clean all paths in `GlobalEnvParams`
1. remove unnecessary path.Join call in `pki.go`
2. fix some typos and comment errors
Signed-off-by: bruceauyeung <ouyang.qinhua@zte.com.cn>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
use in-cluster kubeconfig for genericapiserver
Allow the use of the in-cluster config to communicate with the core API server for delegated authn/authz for an addon API server.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery @sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue
genericapiserver: turn APIContainer.SecretRoutes into a real ServeMux
The secret routes `Mux` is actually a `http.ServeMux` and we are type-casting to it. For downstream we want to wrap it into a restful container which also needs a real `http.ServeMux`.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38154, 38502)
Rename "release_1_5" clientset to just "clientset"
We used to keep multiple releases in the main repo. Now that [client-go](https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go) does the versioning, there is no need to keep releases in the main repo. This PR renames the "release_1_5" clientset to just "clientset", clientset development will be done in this directory.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery @deads2k
```release-note
The main repository does not keep multiple releases of clientsets anymore. Please find previous releases at https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
genericapiserver: unify swagger and openapi in config
- make swagger config customizable
- remove superfluous `Config.Enable*` flags for OpenAPI and Swagger.
This is necessary for downstream projects to tweak the swagger spec.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix connection upgrades through kuberentes-discovery
The initial upgrade through the proxy doesn't use the passed transport to handle the communication to the remote side. Since we need auth proxy headers, this broke the upgrade for exec.
This sets those headers once if its an upgrade request (the transport stomps them if called anyway, so it won't shadow.).
@sttts I think this is the last required piece. Then we start wiring in for e2e.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38315, 38624, 38572, 38544)
kubernetes-discovery proxy
The last commit adds an authenticating (but not authorizing) proxy to `kubernetes-discovery`. The other commits are in the submit queue already.
@sttts @cjcullen This is it. After this we can start e2e wiring.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: cmd/kubeadm
cc @jbeda @mikedanese @luxas @errordeveloper
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the future in
the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers**
section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)