Add a way to set resource limits/requests on running pods
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/21648
I squashed the commits to make rebasing easier
Change log:
- fixed a typo that caused the command to be run with kubectl set set instead of the correct kubectl set limit
- added a ResourcesWithPodTemplates to pkg/kubectl/cmd/util/factory.go
instead of hardcoding these resources move there description all in one place
- Fixing some of the flow control in kubectl set limit
- update the help info
- changed the name of ResourcesWithPodTemplates to ResourcesWithPodSpecs to more accuratly describe what it is doing
and changed the variable names to lower case to conform to go's variable naming convention
- changing the name of the command from 'set limit' to 'set resources'
- Adding the new file pkg/kubectl/cmd/set/set_resources.go
- changes to the test cases to reflect the change from 'kubectl set limit' to 'kubectl set resources'
- comment removed
- adding the man page to the git repository attempting to fix Jenkins tests
- adding the user guide
- fixed a few typos
- typo in hack/cmd-test.sh
- implamenting suggestions for command help text
- adding the dry-run flag
- removing the "remove" option in favor of zeroing out request/limits in order to remove them
- changed limits/requests to requests/limit
- changing ResourcesWithPodSpec
- updated generated docs and removed whitespace
- change priint on success message from "resource limits/requests updated" to "resource requirements updated"
- minor rebasing issues - 'hack/test-cmd.sh' now passes
- cmdutil.PrintSuccess added another argument
- fixing mungedocs failure
- removed whitespace from hack/make-rules/test-cmd.sh and an erroneous entry from pkg/cloudprovider/providers/openstack/MAINTAINERS.md
- fixed typo in Short: field of the cobra command
- rebased
- Creating a new factory in the ResourcesWithPodSpecs() so that the testing will pass
- changing ResourcesWithPodSpecs, it doesn't need to be a method of factory
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add PVC storage to LimitRange
This PR adds the ability to add a LimitRange to a namespace that enforces min/max on `pvc.Spec.Resources.Requests["storage"]`.
@derekwaynecarr @abhgupta @kubernetes/sig-storage
Examples forthcoming.
```release-note
pvc.Spec.Resources.Requests min and max can be enforced with a LimitRange of type "PersistentVolumeClaim" in the namespace
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Clarify the purpose of dramatically-simplify-cluster-creation.md
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We have merged `docs/proposals/dramatically-simplify-cluster-creation.md` mostly because we'd like to keep accurate historic records. This change adds a note to clarify this.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Proposal: Add a rktlet proposal in upstream.
Mostly copied from docs/proposals/kubelet-rkt-runtime.md, plus
roadmaps.
/cc @kubernetes/sig-rktnetes @kubernetes/sig-node @philips @calebamiles @lucab @s-urbaniak @squeed
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update documentation for running e2e tests locally
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The docs for running e2e tests locally needs to be updated.
check_node_count option has been removed and developers usually
need to perform additional steps do get it going.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add delete-namespace-on-failure flag
I have been doing this for a while.
Setting `--delete-namespace=false --clean-start=true` only works if you have only one e2e test running in a loop.
This PR lets someone to set `delete-namespace-on-failure=false` and run multiple tests in parallel and preserve the crime scene. It makes it easier to reproduce failures.
Let me know if this is worth it or there are some other tricks I am not aware.
The docs for running e2e tests locally needs to be updated.
check_node_count option has been removed and developers usually
need to perform additional steps do get it going.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Speed up dockerized builds
This PR speeds up dockerized builds. First, we make sure that we are as incremental as possible. The bigger change is that now we use rsync to move sources into the container and get data back out.
To do yet:
* [x] Add a random password to rsync. This is 128bit MD4, but it is better than nothing.
* [x] Lock down rsync to only come from the host.
* [x] Deal with remote docker engines -- this should be necessary for docker-machine on the mac.
* [x] Allow users to specify the port for the rsync daemon. Perhaps randomize this or let docker pick an ephemeral port and detect the port?
* [x] Copy back generated files so that users can check them in. This is done for `zz_generated.*` files generated by `make generated_files`
* [x] This should include generated proto files so that we can remove the hack-o-rama that is `hack/hack/update-*-dockerized.sh`
* [x] Start "versioning" the build container and the data container so that the CI system doesn't have to be manually kicked.
* [x] Get some benchmarks to qualify how much faster.
This replaces #28518 and is related to #30600.
cc @thockin @spxtr @david-mcmahon @MHBauer
Benchmarks by running `make clean ; sync ; time bash -xc 'time build/make-build-image.sh ; time sync ; time build/run.sh make ; time sync; time build/run.sh make'` on a GCE n1-standard-8 with PD-SSD.
| setup | build image | sync | first build | sync | second build | total |
|-------|-------------|----- |----------|------|--------------|------|
| baseline | 0m11.420s | 0m0.812s | 7m2.353s | 0m42.380s | 7m8.381s | 15m5.348s |
| this pr | 0m10.977s | 0m15.168s | 7m31.096s | 1m55.692s | 0m16.514s | 10m9.449s |
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Proposal: SELinux enhancements
TLDR: Try to make SELinux support better by not requiring Kubelet directory to be labeled with an SELinux type usable from the container.
cc @kubernetes/sig-node @yifan-gu
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add community expectations about conduct and reviewing.
@sarahnovotny @smarterclayton @philips @thockin @davidopp @jbeda
As discussed in the previous community meeting here's a description of the expectations around community, I expanded it a little bit beyond code review because it seemed like a good place to put it
down in one location.
Please let me know what I got wrong (or right ;)
Thanks
--brendan
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Proposal: Add HyperContainer runtime
This PR adds a proposal for integrating [HyperContainer](http://hypercontainer.io) runtime via CRI.
CC @dchen1107 @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Change minion to node
Continuation of #1111
I tried to keep this PR down to just a simple search-n-replace to keep
things simple. I may have gone too far in some spots but its easy to
roll those back if needed - just let me know.
I avoided renaming `contrib/mesos/pkg/minion` because there's already
a `contrib/mesos/pkg/node` dir and fixing that will require a bit of work
due to a circular import chain that pops up. So I'm saving that for a
follow-on PR.
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Contination of #1111
I tried to keep this PR down to just a simple search-n-replace to keep
things simple. I may have gone too far in some spots but its easy to
roll those back if needed.
I avoided renaming `contrib/mesos/pkg/minion` because there's already
a `contrib/mesos/pkg/node` dir and fixing that will require a bit of work
due to a circular import chain that pops up. So I'm saving that for a
follow-on PR.
I rolled back some of this from a previous commit because it just got
to big/messy. Will follow up with additional PRs
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move SELinux proposal to docs/design
Moves the proposal into the docs/design directory, as should have happened long ago.
Euan Kemp