Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement ExternalName in kube-dns
Part of the ongoing saga formerly known as https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/33
This is the prelude (first commit) in #30931, spawn into a separate PR to allow building a new kube-dns image before e2e tests (the rest of #30931) are updated.
ExternalName allows kubedns to return CNAME records for external
services. No proxying is involved.
cc @thockin
Automatic merge from submit-queue
support Azure data disk volume
This is a WIP of supporting azure data disk volume. Will add test and dynamic provisioning support once #29006 is merged
replace #25915fix#23259
@kubernetes/sig-storage
@colemickens @brendandburns
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Clarify documentation that new admission control plugin must be imported
```release-note
```
Admission control design doc doesn't mention importing the plugin to plugins.go. I was unable to get the plugin to build into my binary without it. Updated documentation to prevent future confusion.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add readyReplicas to replica sets
@bgrant0607 for the api changes
@bprashanth for the controllers changes
@deads2k fyi
Automatic merge from submit-queue
docs/devel: document the behavior of github UI for PRs
Documents the problem encountered in #30596
cc @bgrant0607 @thockin @roberthbailey
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Unblock iterative development on pod-level cgroups
In order to allow forward progress on this feature, it takes the commits from #28017#29049 and then it globally disables the flag that allows these features to be exercised in the kubelet. The flag can be re-added to the kubelet when its actually ready.
/cc @vishh @dubstack @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add Service type "ExternalName" which results in CNAME DNS
ExternalName allows kubedns to return CNAME records for external
services. No proxying is involved.
First step for https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/33
See original issue at
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/13748
No release note yet, that will come with the kubedns change.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add a short `-n` for `kubectl --namespace`
fixes#24078
`--namespace` is a very common flag for nearly every `kubectl` command we have. We should claim `-n` for it.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
more explictly about NoDiskConflicts policy and applicable volume types
partially clarify #29670
@kubernetes/sig-scheduling
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Incorrect branch name for git push command in development.md
the branch name is "my-feature":
### Create a branch and make changes
```sh
git checkout -b my-feature
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Quobyte Volume plugin
@quofelix and myself developed a volume plugin for [Quobyte](http://www.quobyte.com) which is a software-defined storage solution. This PR allows Kubernetes users to mount a Quobyte Volume inside their containers over Kubernetes.
Here are some further informations about [Quobyte and Storage for containers](http://www.quobyte.com/containers)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement dynamic provisioning (beta) of PersistentVolumes via StorageClass
Implemented according to PR #26908. There are several patches in this PR with one huge code regen inside.
* Please review the API changes (the first patch) carefully, sometimes I don't know what the code is doing...
* `PV.Spec.Class` and `PVC.Spec.Class` is not implemented, use annotation `volume.alpha.kubernetes.io/storage-class`
* See e2e test and integration test changes - Kubernetes won't provision a thing without explicit configuration of at least one `StorageClass` instance!
* Multiple provisioning volume plugins can coexist together, e.g. HostPath and AWS EBS. This is important for Gluster and RBD provisioners in #25026
* Contradicting the proposal, `claim.Selector` and `volume.alpha.kubernetes.io/storage-class` annotation are **not** mutually exclusive. They're both used for matching existing PVs. However, only `volume.alpha.kubernetes.io/storage-class` is used for provisioning, configuration of provisioning with `Selector` is left for (near) future.
* Documentation is missing. Can please someone write some while I am out?
For now, AWS volume plugin accepts classes with these parameters:
```
kind: StorageClass
metadata:
name: slow
provisionerType: kubernetes.io/aws-ebs
provisionerParameters:
type: io1
zone: us-east-1d
iopsPerGB: 10
```
* parameters are case-insensitive
* `type`: `io1`, `gp2`, `sc1`, `st1`. See AWS docs for details
* `iopsPerGB`: only for `io1` volumes. I/O operations per second per GiB. AWS volume plugin multiplies this with size of requested volume to compute IOPS of the volume and caps it at 20 000 IOPS (maximum supported by AWS, see AWS docs).
* of course, the plugin will use some defaults when a parameter is omitted in a `StorageClass` instance (`gp2` in the same zone as in 1.3).
GCE:
```
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: StorageClass
metadata:
name: slow
provisionerType: kubernetes.io/gce-pd
provisionerParameters:
type: pd-standard
zone: us-central1-a
```
* `type`: `pd-standard` or `pd-ssd`
* `zone`: GCE zone
* of course, the plugin will use some defaults when a parameter is omitted in a `StorageClass` instance (SSD in the same zone as in 1.3 ?).
No OpenStack/Cinder yet
@kubernetes/sig-storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubelet eviction on inode exhaustion
Add support for kubelet to monitor for inode exhaustion of either image or rootfs, and in response, attempt to reclaim node level resources and/or evict pods.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Allow setting permission mode bits on secrets, configmaps and downwardAPI files
cc @thockin @pmorie
Here is the first round to implement: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/28733.
I made two commits: one with the actual change and the other with the auto-generated code. I think it's easier to review this way, but let me know if you prefer in some other way.
I haven't written any tests yet, I wanted to have a first glance and not write them till this (and the API) are more close to the "LGTM" :)
There are some things:
* I'm not sure where to do the "AND 0777". I'll try to look better in the code base, but suggestions are always welcome :)
* The write permission on group and others is not set when you do an `ls -l` on the running container. It does work with write permissions to the owner. Debugging seems to show that is something happening after this is correctly set on creation. Will look closer.
* The default permission (when the new fields are not specified) are the same that on kubernetes v1.3
* I do realize there are conflicts with master, but I think this is good enough to have a look. The conflicts is with the autog-enerated code, so the actual code is actually the same (and it takes like ~30 minutes to generate it here)
* I didn't generate the docs (`generated-docs` and `generated-swagger-docs` from `hack/update-all.sh`) because my machine runs out of mem. So that's why it isn't in this first PR, will try to investigate and see why it happens.
Other than that, this works fine here with some silly scripts I did to create a secret&configmap&downwardAPI, a pod and check the file permissions. Tested the "defaultMode" and "mode" for all. But of course, will write tests once this is looking fine :)
Thanks a lot again!
Rodrigo
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove incorrect docs about unset fields in NetworkPolicyPeer
While hammering out the semantics of not-present vs present-but-empty, we appear to have added incorrect clarifications to NetworkPolicyPeer, where the semantics of PodSelector not being present is supposed to be "do what NamespaceSelector" says, not "select no pods", and likewise with NamespaceSelector not being present.
I think it's clearest if we just don't say anything, since we already said "Exactly one of the following must be specified" above. Alternatively we could be redundant and say "(If not provided, then NamespaceSelector must be set.)" or something like that.
@caseydavenport @thockin
Kubernetes Submit Queue