Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update the Pod Resource Management Proposal with Implementation status
This is tied to the upstream issue #27204 for adding pod level cgroups into Kubernetes.
@vishh @derekwaynecarr @Random-Liu PTAL.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update the AppArmor design proposal
3 modifications to the original AppArmor design proposal:
1. Remove the pod-level AppArmor profile specification, since it was unnecessary complexity. I think the typical multi-container case is a main app, some side-cars (e.g. log helpers), and maybe some init containers. All of those containers are likely to have very different permissions needs, so I do not see benefit to the pod-level profile. If there is sufficient demand (i.e. user feedback) for this feature we can add it back.
2. Added a proposal for the beta (and GA) API. Beginning the discussion of this API now will smooth the transition from alpha, and guide the implementation of the internal API.
3. [EDIT] The profile deployment pod will poll the source directories for changes. This change is motivated by the fact that DaemonSets must run with RestartAlways.
/cc @bgrant0607 @erictune @pmorie @pweil-
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update proposed flag names for kubelet eviction
This PR changes the flag names proposed in kubelet eviction for minimum amount of resource to reclaim when triggering an eviction.
This captures the design change proposed and agreed to in #27199
Having it in a separate PR removes noise from reviewing the core PR.
/cc @vishh @ronnielai PTAL
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Flannel doc description cidr modify
File "docs\proposals\flannel-integration.md", line 123, "node controller backs off cidr allocation", here cidr is not easy to understand, can be modified to CIDR.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Proposal for ControllerReference
Proposal for including the reference pointing to the owning "collection" (controller) for objects that can be grouped. The goal is to prevent a situation when two controllers are fighting over some resources.
cc @bgrant0607 @lavalamp @caesarxuchao @davidopp @fgrzadkowski @wojtek-t @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add proposal for service externalName
This is a proposal to address: #13748.
@smarterclayton @ncdc @thockin. Please check this out when you have time, hopefully this is okay :-D
I created the proposal because was unsure if the feature would be able to go in if there isn't a proposal already merged, because of this mail to kubernetes-pm: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/kubernetes-pm/Ki63EztfZMo.
So, IIUC it would be nice to have the proposal merged ASAP (I think the interface looks ok for all, so hopefully this will be easy) so we can have this feature in 1.4 as you guys ( @smarterclayton @ncdc ) need.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add proposal for secret and configmap files mode bits
This is a proposal to address https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/28317.
cc @pmorie (owner) @thockin
@thockin: Sorry if you preferred not to be CCed, I thougth you'd be interested :-)
I think this is always the case, but let me say it one more time just in case: as this is a PR, ALL the feedback is more than welcome!
It's my first time in kubernetes, so sorry in advance if this is obviously wrong. What I realize now is that I forgot to add the headers to the proposal. Is there some script to add them? Or should I just c&p from some other proposal?
Thanks a lot,
Rodrigo
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Doc referrence "container-id" incorrect
File "docs\proposals\disk-accounting.md", line 154, "Everything under `/var/lib/docker/overlay/<container-id>` are files required for running the container", here "container-id" is incorrect because files under "/var/lib/docker/overlay" are layer files, and "container-id" should be "id" thus consistent with line 148 "Image layers and writable layers are stored under `/var/lib/docker/overlay/<id>`".
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Deprecate the term "Ubernetes"
Deprecate the term "Ubernetes" in favor of "Cluster Federation" and "Multi-AZ Clusters"
Search and replace for references to moved examples
Reverted find and replace paths on auto gen docs
Reverting changes to changelog
Fix bugs in test-cmd.sh
Fixed path in examples README
ran update-all successfully
Updated verify-flags exceptions to include renamed files
This commit includes a proposal and a Go file to re-define the container
runtime interface.
Note that this is an experimental interface and is expected to go through
multiple revisions once developers start implementing against it. As stated in
the proposal, there are also individual issues to carry discussions of
specific features.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
to remove workflow proposal
@erictune @brendanburns
I think workflow proposal should be removed now. If you have a specific plan to remove it disregard this.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
remove ConfigMap example from GC proposal
We need more thoughts on the design. Remove it to avoid causing confusion.
@derekwaynecarr @lavalamp
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Proposal: persistent volume selector
Partially replaces #17056. Another proposal will follow dealing with dynamic provisioning on top of storage classes.
@kubernetes/sig-storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Updaing QoS policy to be at the pod level
Quality of Service will be derived from an entire Pod Spec, instead of being derived from resource specifications of individual resources per-container.
A Pod is `Guaranteed` iff all its containers have limits == requests for all the first-class resources (cpu, memory as of now).
A Pod is `BestEffort` iff requests & limits are not specified for any resource across all containers.
A Pod is `Burstable` otherwise.
Note: Existing pods might be more susceptible to OOM Kills on the node due to this PR! To protect pods from being OOM killed on the node, set `limits` for all resources across all containers in a pod.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="http://reviewable.k8s.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](http://reviewable.k8s.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/14943)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Automatic merge from submit-queue
systemd node spec proposal
The following outlines changes that I want to make to the ```kubelet``` in order to better integrate with ```systemd``` systems, and to better isolate containers in their own ```cgroup``` based on the qos tier.
I think this is a precursor to getting more intelligent low compute resource eviction.
/cc @smarterclayton @ncdc @pmorie @dchen1107 @vishh @bgrant0607
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="http://reviewable.k8s.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](http://reviewable.k8s.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/17688)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Automatic merge from submit-queue
docs: Self-hosted Kubelet proposal
Provides a proposal for changes needed with Kubernetes to allow for a
self-hosted Kubelet bootstrap.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Kubelet pod eviction proposal
The following is a proposal for how the `kubelet` may pro-actively fail a pod in response to local compute resources being starved. The proposal focuses on memory as a first candidate, and defines a `greedy` strategy for reclaiming starved resources on the node since it seemed easiest to describe for operators versus other options and probably satisfies a broad set of use case environments.
Putting this out now for community feedback, but anticipate some more refinement around how we report eviction configuration back to users in the `Node API`.
/cc @bgrant0607 @smarterclayton @vishh @dchen1107 @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra @kubernetes/goog-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add proposal for kubelet TLS bootstrap
A proposal based on the discussion of issue #18112, to implement a process by which kubelets can obtain TLS certificates in a streamlined manner.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Proposal for improving local cluster experience.
This proposal attempts to improve the existing single node, local cluster experience in Kubernetes.
It is **not** a proposal that helps with setting up a multi-node, production cluster.
cc @dlorenc @ethernetdan @runseb @mfburnett @bgrant0607 @pwittrock
This is for internal use at the moment, for testing Ubernetes Lite, but
arguably makes the code a little cleaner.
Also rename KUBE_SHARE_MASTER -> KUBE_USE_EXISTING_MASTER
Kubernetes Submit Queue
