Get command now uses metadata x-kubernetes-print-columns, if present, in Openapi schema
to format output for a resource. This functionality is guarded by a boolean
flag 'use-openapi-print-columns'.
This fixes#38779.
This allows us to avoid case in which printers.GetStandardPrinter
returns nil for both printer and err removing any potential panics that
may arise throughout kubectl commands.
Please see #38779 and #38112 for complete context.
Add comment explaining adding handlers to printers.HumanReadablePrinter
also remove an unnecessary conversion of printers.HumanReadablePrinter
to printers.ResourcePrinter.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Visibility rules allow dependency control. The rules currently in
place make all targets public, to override the default state of
private. This PR removes public visibility from kubectl code. It
uses specially named pacakge groups to identify "bad" dependencies on
kubectl code for later refactoring or removal.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
First in a series of PRs to address kubernetes/community#598
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42087, 43383, 43622)
move category expansion out of restmapper
RESTMapping isn't related to CategoryExpansion (the bit that expands "all" into items to be RESTMapped). This provides that separation and simplifies the RESTMapper interface.
@kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41937, 41151, 42092, 40269, 42135)
Add a unit test for idempotent applys to the TPR entries.
The test in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
The apply operation expects a last-modified-configuration annotation.
That is written verbatim in the test/fixture file.
References #40841
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds one unit test for TPR's using applies.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
References:
https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/95https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40841#issue-204769102
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I am not super proud of the tpr-entry name.
But I feel like we need to call the two objects differently.
The one which has Kind:ThirdPartyResource
and the one has Kind:Foo.
Is the name "ThirdPartyResource" used interchangeably for both ? I used tpr-entry for the Kind:Foo object.
Also I !assume! this is testing an idempotent apply because the last-applied-configuration annotation is the same as the object itself.
This is the state I see in the logs of kubectl if I do a proper idempotent apply of a third party resource entry.
I guess I will know more once I start playing around with apply command that change TPR objects.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
The tests in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
In PATCH request rount-tripper we check that the kubectl apply
implementation worked as expected.
References #40841
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35408, 41915, 41992, 41964, 41925)
add secret option to flag
To resolve the issue of security(pr #35030 ),
> @smarterclayton commented 5 days ago
> This is unfortunately not all flags that could be secrets. The best option would be to add support in spf13/pflag to tag a flag as a secret, and then use that bit to determine the list.
>
> Also, Command() could be used in contexts that need exact parameters (for subshell execution), so we would need to add a new method or extend the signature here to allow exact flags to be retrieved.
we could add a secret option to the flags.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41814, 41922, 41957, 41406, 41077)
add kubectl can-i to see if you can perform an action
Adds `kubectl auth can-i <verb> <resource> [<name>]` so that a user can see if they are allowed to perform an action.
@kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @fabianofranz
This particular command satisfies the immediate need of knowing if you can perform an action without trying that action. When using RBAC in a script that is adding permissions, there is a lag between adding the permission and the permission being realized in the RBAC cache. As a user on the CLI, you almost never see it, but as a script adding a binding and then using that new power, you hit it quite often.
There are natural follow-ons to the same area (hence the `auth` subcommand) to figure out if someone else can perform an action, what actions you can perform in total, and who can perform a given action. Someone else is an API we have already, what-can-i-do was a proposed API a while back and a very useful one for interfaces, and who-can is common question if someone is administering a namespace.
The factory knows all possible types, and should abstract the process of
creating all printers. A future refactor can further reduce the
dependencies between printer code and internal types.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
shortcut expander will take the list of short names from the api ser…
**What this PR does / why we need it**: the shortcut expander will take the list of short names for resources from the API server during the discovery. For backward compatibility a hardcoded list of short names will always be appended while evaluating a short name.
mark --output-version as deprecated, add example for fully-qualifying version to edit
Add 'kubectl edit' testcase for editing schemaed and schemaless data together
Add 'kubectl edit' testcase for editing unknown version of known group/kind
Add 'kubectl edit' testcase for saving a repeated error
Add 'kubectl edit' testcase for preserving an edited file with a syntax error
Add 'kubectl edit' testcase for recording command on list of objects
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41145, 38771, 41003, 41089, 40365)
Add `kubectl attach` support for multiple types
To address this issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24857
the new `kubectl attach` will contain three scenarios depend on args:
1. `kubectl attach POD` : if only one argument provided, we assume it's a pod name
2. `kubectl attach TYPE NAME` : if two arguments provided, we assume first one is resource we [supported](4770162fd3/pkg/kubectl/cmd/util/factory_object_mapping.go (L285)), the second resource's name.
3. `kubectl attach TYPE/NAME` : one argument provided and arg[0] must contain `/`, ditto
Is there any other scenarios I haven't consider in ?
for now the first scenario is compatible with changed before, also `make test` pass ✅
will write some unit test to test second and third scenario, if you guys think i'm doing the right way.
@pwittrock @kargakis @fabianofranz @ymqytw @AdoHe
hot fix
add unit test and statefulSet
update example
remove package
change to ResourceNames
remove some code
remove strings
add fake testing func for AttachablePodForObject
minor change
add test.obj nil check
update testfile
gofmt
update
add fallthough
revert back
Automatic merge from submit-queue
have basic kubectl crud agnostic of registered types
Makes `kubectl get` agnostic to scheme (baked in API types). This means that it will now work against generic API servers that are "kube shaped".
This is similar to the work done for `kubectl create` last release. I'll split out the smaller command. `kubectl get` looks a lot different, but this eliminates all special casing for TPR in those cases.
@fabianofranz
Calling `internalclientset.New()` with a rest client as an argument simply
copies that rest client to all the API group clients irrespective of the
configured GroupVersion or versionedAPIPath in the client. So only one
API group client gets the client configured correctly for that API
group. All the other API group clients get misconfigured rest clients.
On the other hand, `internalclientset.NewForConfigOrDie()` does the right
thing by reconfiguring the passed configs for each API group and
initializes an appropriate rest client for that group.
Now that we are relying on the `NewForConfigOrDie()` method to
initialize the rest clients, we need to swap the underlying http clients
in each of these rest clients with a fake one for testing.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Better kubectl run validations
Adds more validations to flags that must be mutually exclusive in `kubectl run`. For example, `--dry-run` must not be used with `--attach`, `--stdin` or `--tty`. Adds unit tests for these new validations and some previously existing ones.
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```release-note
NONE
```
Alter how runtime.SerializeInfo is represented to simplify negotiation
and reduce the need to allocate during negotiation. Simplify the dynamic
client's logic around negotiating type. Add more tests for media type
handling where necessary.
This is so that we can use NewAPIFactory() from cmd/set/*test.go
Up until now we would get a import loop error.
This commit also adds a basic unit test case for cmd/set/set_image.go
shashidharatd