Automatic merge from submit-queue
remove incorrect groupName comment for apps.k8s.io
The group name is "apps", not "apps.k8s.io"
The comment didn't actually affect client generation because there was an extra space between it and the package declaration, but removing it to avoid confusion
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37860, 38429, 38451, 36050, 38463)
Stop generating openapi spec for internal types
Extracted from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38406
I don't think we should be generating openapi specs for the internal types, since they are never intended to be interacted with via the API. #38406 makes that very clear by removing the json tags, at which point the openapi spec field names mimic the go structs
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 36071, 32752, 37998, 38350, 38401)
Add test for concurrent evictions requests
This is a followup PR after #37668.
Add a test case to make sure concurrent eviction requests can be handled.
@davidopp @lavalamp
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35300, 36709, 37643, 37813, 37697)
Add generated informers
Add informer-gen and the informers it generates. We'll do follow-up PRs to convert everything currently using the hand-written informers to the generated ones.
TODO:
- [x] switch to `GroupVersionResource`
- [x] finish godoc
@deads2k @caesarxuchao @sttts @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35300, 36709, 37643, 37813, 37697)
add rbac action to subjects type
This adds the ability to go from an authorization action to the list subjects who have the power to perform the action. This will be used to either back an RBAC specific endpoint or generic authorization endpoint. Because of the way authorization works today, the set of subjects returned will always be a subset of those with access since any authorizer can say yes.
@kubernetes/sig-auth
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove ExportOptions from api/internal and use unversioned
Should only have one internal object in use
Part of #37530
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 36263, 36755, 37357, 37222, 37524)
Add flag to enable contention profiling in scheduler.
```release-note
Add flag to enable contention profiling in scheduler.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add kubectl get rolebindings/clusterrolebindings -o wide
Use "-o wide" to get more information of roleRef/subjects
`kubectl get rolebindings -o wide`
|NAME | AGE | ROLE | USERS | GROUPS | SERVICEACCOUNTS|
|:-------|:-------|:-------|:-------|:-------|:-------|
|admin-resource-binding |1s | Role/admin-resource-role | test | | |
`kubectl get clusterrolebindings -o wide`
|NAME|AGE|ROLE|USERS|GROUPS|SERVICEACCOUNTS|
|:-------|:-------|:-------|:-------|:-------|:-------|
|cluster-admin|27s|cluster-admin| |system:masters| |
|system:basic-user|27s|system:basic-user| |system:authenticated, system:unauthenticated | |
|system:controller:replication-controller|27s|system:controller:replication-controller | | |kube-system/replication-controller|
|system:discovery |27s|system:discovery| |system:authenticated, system:unauthenticated| |
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/apis
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Maciej Szulik