Update links to security contexts and service accounts to point to actual docs instead of pull requests now that those proposals have been merged

pull/6/head
Ben McCann 2015-02-23 13:55:02 -08:00
parent 517f30a1da
commit b73662ac95
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ service would also consume the secrets associated with the MySQL service.
### Use-Case: Secrets associated with service accounts ### Use-Case: Secrets associated with service accounts
[Service Accounts](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/kubernetes/pull/2297) are proposed as a [Service Accounts](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/design/service_accounts.md) are proposed as a
mechanism to decouple capabilities and security contexts from individual human users. A mechanism to decouple capabilities and security contexts from individual human users. A
`ServiceAccount` contains references to some number of secrets. A `Pod` can specify that it is `ServiceAccount` contains references to some number of secrets. A `Pod` can specify that it is
associated with a `ServiceAccount`. Secrets should have a `Type` field to allow the Kubelet and associated with a `ServiceAccount`. Secrets should have a `Type` field to allow the Kubelet and
@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ memory overcommit on the node.
#### Secret data on the node: isolation #### Secret data on the node: isolation
Every pod will have a [security context](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/kubernetes/pull/3910). Every pod will have a [security context](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/design/security_context.md).
Secret data on the node should be isolated according to the security context of the container. The Secret data on the node should be isolated according to the security context of the container. The
Kubelet volume plugin API will be changed so that a volume plugin receives the security context of Kubelet volume plugin API will be changed so that a volume plugin receives the security context of
a volume along with the volume spec. This will allow volume plugins to implement setting the a volume along with the volume spec. This will allow volume plugins to implement setting the
@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ Several proposals / upstream patches are notable as background for this proposal
1. [Docker vault proposal](https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/10310) 1. [Docker vault proposal](https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/10310)
2. [Specification for image/container standardization based on volumes](https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/9277) 2. [Specification for image/container standardization based on volumes](https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/9277)
3. [Kubernetes service account proposal](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/kubernetes/pull/2297) 3. [Kubernetes service account proposal](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/design/service_accounts.md)
4. [Secrets proposal for docker (1)](https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/6075) 4. [Secrets proposal for docker (1)](https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/6075)
5. [Secrets proposal for docker (2)](https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/6697) 5. [Secrets proposal for docker (2)](https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/6697)