From b66a5d23ac1ad105c74da178d6ea082233fe3070 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:18:03 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix description of considered PVs for unset claim.Spec.Class

---
 docs/proposals/volume-provisioning.md | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/proposals/volume-provisioning.md b/docs/proposals/volume-provisioning.md
index 34d5832819..68b30b693c 100644
--- a/docs/proposals/volume-provisioning.md
+++ b/docs/proposals/volume-provisioning.md
@@ -112,8 +112,7 @@ We propose that:
     1. If the claim has non-empty `claim.Spec.Class`, only PVs with the same
         `pv.Spec.Class` are considered.
 
-    2. If the claim has empty `claim.Spec.Class`, all existing PVs are
-        considered.
+    2. If the claim has empty `claim.Spec.Class`, only PVs with an unset `pv.Spec.Class` are considered.
 
     All "considered" volumes are evaluated and the
     smallest matching volume is bound to the claim.