mirror of https://github.com/k3s-io/k3s
commit
15a20bd96a
|
@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ antagonism and ask the rescheduler to move one of the antagonists to a new node.
|
||||||
The vast majority of users probably only care about rescheduling for three scenarios:
|
The vast majority of users probably only care about rescheduling for three scenarios:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Move Pods around to get a PENDING Pod to schedule
|
1. Move Pods around to get a PENDING Pod to schedule
|
||||||
1. Redistribute Pods onto new nodes added by a cluster auto-scaler when ther are no PENDING Pods
|
1. Redistribute Pods onto new nodes added by a cluster auto-scaler when there are no PENDING Pods
|
||||||
1. Move Pods around when CPU starvation is detected on a node
|
1. Move Pods around when CPU starvation is detected on a node
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Design considerations and design space
|
## Design considerations and design space
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue