ENH: fix to use upstream --remove-rules

https://fedorahosted.org/firewalld/ticket/10
pull/412/head
Daniel Black 11 years ago
parent 93de46ac72
commit 8ac6081555

@ -15,15 +15,8 @@ actionstart = firewall-cmd --direct --add-chain ipv4 filter fail2ban-<name>
firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter fail2ban-<name> 1000 -j RETURN
firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter <chain> 0 -m state --state NEW -p <protocol> --dport <port> -j fail2ban-<name>
# The following rule does not work, because firewalld keeps its own database of firewall rules.
# firewall-cmd --direct --passthrough ipv4 -F fail2ban-<name>
# The better rule would be the following, but firewall-cmd has not implemented this command with firewalld-0.3.3-2.fc19 .
# firewall-cmd --direct --flush-chain ipv4 filter fail2ban-<name>
# The following is a workaround using a loop to implement the --flush-chain command.
# https://fedorahosted.org/firewalld/ticket/10
actionstop = firewall-cmd --direct --remove-rule ipv4 filter <chain> 0 -m state --state NEW -p <protocol> --dport <port> -j fail2ban-<name>
( IFS='|' ; for r in $( firewall-cmd --direct --get-rules ipv4 filter fail2ban-<name> | tr '\n' '|' ) ; do eval firewall-cmd --direct --remove-rule ipv4 filter fail2ban-<name> $r ; done )
firewall-cmd --direct --remove-rules ipv4 filter fail2ban-<name>
firewall-cmd --direct --remove-chain ipv4 filter fail2ban-<name>
actioncheck = firewall-cmd --direct --get-chains ipv4 filter | grep -q 'fail2ban-<name>[ \t]'

Loading…
Cancel
Save