mirror of https://github.com/hashicorp/consul
401 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
401 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
layout: docs
|
|
page_title: ACL Token Migration
|
|
sidebar_title: 'Token Migration'
|
|
sidebar_current: docs-acl-migrate-tokens
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Consul 1.4.0 introduces a new ACL system with improvements for the security
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
management of ACL tokens and policies. This guide documents how to upgrade
|
|
|
|
existing (now called "legacy") tokens after upgrading to 1.4.0.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# ACL Token Migration
|
|
|
|
Consul 1.4.0 introduces a new ACL system with improvements for the security and
|
|
management of ACL tokens and policies. This guide documents how to upgrade
|
|
existing (now called "legacy") tokens after upgrading to 1.4.0.
|
|
|
|
Since the policy syntax changed to be more precise and flexible to manage, it's
|
|
necessary to manually translate old tokens into new ones to take advantage of
|
|
the new ACL system features. Tooling is provided to help automate this and this
|
|
guide describes the overall process.
|
|
|
|
~> **Note**: Before starting the token migration process all Consul agents, servers
|
|
and clients, must be running at least version 1.4.0. Additionally, you
|
|
must ensure the cluster is in a healthy state including a functioning leader. Once
|
|
the leader has determined that all servers in the cluster are capable of using the
|
|
new ACL system, the leader will transition itself. Then, the other servers will
|
|
transition themselves to the new system, followed by the client agents. You can
|
|
use `consul info` to investigate the cluster health.
|
|
|
|
Consul 1.4.0 retains full support for "legacy" ACL tokens so upgrades
|
|
from Consul 1.3.0 are safe. Existing tokens will continue to work in the same
|
|
way for at least two "major" releases (1.5.x, 1.6.x, etc; note HashiCorp does
|
|
not use SemVer for our products).
|
|
|
|
This document will briefly describes the [high-level migration process](#migration-process) and provides some [specific examples](#migration-examples) of migration strategies.
|
|
|
|
## Migration Process
|
|
|
|
While "legacy" tokens will continue to work for several major releases, it's
|
|
advisable to plan on migrating existing tokens as soon as is convenient.
|
|
Migrating also enables using the new policy management improvements, stricter
|
|
policy syntax rules and other features of the new system without
|
|
re-issuing all the secrets in use.
|
|
|
|
The high-level process for migrating a legacy token is as follows:
|
|
|
|
1. Create a new policy or policies that grant the required access
|
|
2. Update the existing token to use those policies
|
|
|
|
### Prerequisites
|
|
|
|
This process assumes that the 1.4.0 upgrade is complete including all legacy
|
|
ACLs having their accessor IDs populated. This might take up to several minutes
|
|
after the servers upgrade in the primary datacenter. You can tell if this is the
|
|
case by using `consul acl token list` and checking that no tokens exist with a
|
|
blank `AccessorID`.
|
|
|
|
In addition, it is assumed that all clients that might _create_ ACL tokens (e.g.
|
|
Vault's Consul secrets engine) have been updated to use the [new ACL
|
|
APIs](/api/acl/tokens).
|
|
|
|
Specifically if you are using Vault's Consul secrets engine you need to be
|
|
running Vault 1.0.0 or higher, _and_ you must update all roles defined in Vault
|
|
to specify a list of policy names rather than an inline policy (which causes
|
|
Vault to use the legacy API).
|
|
|
|
~> **Note:** if you have systems still creating "legacy" tokens with the old
|
|
APIs, the migration steps below will still work, however you'll have to keep
|
|
re-running them until nothing is creating legacy tokens to ensure all tokens are
|
|
migrated.
|
|
|
|
### Creating Policies
|
|
|
|
There are a range of different strategies for creating new policies from existing
|
|
tokens. Two high-level strategies are described here although others or a
|
|
mixture of these may be most appropriate depending on the ACL tokens you already
|
|
have.
|
|
|
|
#### Strategy 1: Simple Policy Mapping
|
|
|
|
The simplest and most automatic strategy is to create one new policy for every
|
|
existing token. This is easy to automate, but may result in a lot of policies
|
|
with exactly the same rules and with non-human-readable names which will make
|
|
managing policies harder. This approach can be accomplished using the [`consul acl policy create`](/docs/commands/acl/policy/create) command with
|
|
`-from-token` option.
|
|
|
|
| Pros | Cons |
|
|
| ------------------------ | ------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| ✅ Simple | ❌ May leave many duplicated policies |
|
|
| ✅ Easy to automate | ❌ Policy names not human-readable |
|
|
|
|
A detailed example of using this approach is [given
|
|
below](#simple-policy-mapping).
|
|
|
|
#### Strategy 2: Combining Policies
|
|
|
|
This strategy takes a more manual approach to create a more manageable set of
|
|
policies. There are a spectrum of options for how to do this which tradeoff
|
|
increasing human involvement for increasing clarity and re-usability of the
|
|
resulting policies.
|
|
|
|
For example you could use hashes of the policy rules to de-duplicate identical
|
|
token policies automatically, however naming them something meaningful for
|
|
humans would likely still need manual intervention.
|
|
|
|
Toward the other end of the spectrum it might be beneficial for security to
|
|
translate prefix matches into exact matches. This however requires the operator
|
|
knowing that clients using the token really doesn't rely on the prefix matching
|
|
semantics of the old ACL system.
|
|
|
|
To assist with this approach, there is a CLI tool and corresponding API that can
|
|
translate a legacy ACL token's rules into a new ACL policy that is exactly
|
|
equivalent. See [`consul acl translate-rules`](/docs/commands/acl/translate-rules).
|
|
|
|
| Pros | Cons |
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
| ✅ Clearer, more manageable policies | ❌ Requires more manual effort |
|
|
| ✅ Policies can be re-used by new ACL tokens | ❌ May take longer for large or complex existing policy sets |
|
|
|
|
A detailed example of using this approach is [given below](#combining-policies).
|
|
|
|
### Updating Existing Tokens
|
|
|
|
Once you have created one or more policies that adequately express the rules
|
|
needed for a legacy token, you can update the token via the CLI or API to use
|
|
those policies.
|
|
|
|
After updating, the token is no longer considered "legacy" and will have all the
|
|
properties of a new token, however it keeps it's `SecretID` (the secret part of
|
|
the token used in API calls) so clients already using that token will continue
|
|
to work. It is assumed that the policies you attach continue to grant the
|
|
necessary access for existing clients; this is up to the operator to ensure.
|
|
|
|
#### Update via API
|
|
|
|
Use the [`PUT /v1/acl/token/:AccessorID`](/api/acl/tokens#update-a-token)
|
|
endpoint. Specifically, ensure that the `Rules` field is omitted or empty. Empty
|
|
`Rules` indicates that this is now treated as a new token.
|
|
|
|
#### Update via CLI
|
|
|
|
Use the [`consul acl token update`](/docs/commands/acl/token/update)
|
|
command to update the token. Specifically you need to use `-upgrade-legacy`
|
|
which will ensure that legacy rules are removed as well as the new policies
|
|
added.
|
|
|
|
## Migration Examples
|
|
|
|
Below are two detailed examples of the two high-level strategies for creating
|
|
policies discussed above. It should be noted these are intended to clarify the
|
|
concrete steps you might take. **We don't recommend you perform production
|
|
migrations with ad-hoc terminal commands**. Combining these or something similar
|
|
into a script might be appropriate.
|
|
|
|
### Simple Policy Mapping
|
|
|
|
This strategy uses the CLI to create a new policy for every existing legacy
|
|
token with exactly equivalent rules. It's easy to automate and clients will see
|
|
no change in behavior for their tokens, but it does leave you with a lot of
|
|
potentially identical policies to manage or clean up later.
|
|
|
|
#### Create Policies
|
|
|
|
You can get the AccessorID of every legacy token from the API. For example,
|
|
using `curl` and `jq` in bash:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ LEGACY_IDS=$(curl -sH "X-Consul-Token: $CONSUL_HTTP_TOKEN" \
|
|
'localhost:8500/v1/acl/tokens' | jq -r '.[] | select (.Legacy) | .AccessorID')
|
|
$ echo "$LEGACY_IDS"
|
|
621cbd12-dde7-de06-9be0-e28d067b5b7f
|
|
65cecc86-eb5b-ced5-92dc-f861cf7636fe
|
|
ba464aa8-d857-3d26-472c-4d49c3bdae72
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
To create a policy for each one we can use something like:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
for id in $LEGACY_IDS; do \
|
|
consul acl policy create -name "migrated-$id" -from-token $id \
|
|
-description "Migrated from legacy ACL token"; \
|
|
done
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Each policy now has an identical set of rules to the original token. You can
|
|
inspect these:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ consul acl policy read -name migrated-621cbd12-dde7-de06-9be0-e28d067b5b7f
|
|
ID: 573d84bd-8b08-3061-e391-d2602e1b4947
|
|
Name: migrated-621cbd12-dde7-de06-9be0-e28d067b5b7f
|
|
Description: Migrated from legacy ACL token
|
|
Datacenters:
|
|
Rules:
|
|
service_prefix "" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Notice how the policy here is `service_prefix` and not `service` since the old
|
|
ACL syntax was an implicit prefix match. This ensures any clients relying on
|
|
prefix matching behavior will still work.
|
|
|
|
#### Update Tokens
|
|
|
|
With the policies created as above, we can automatically upgrade all legacy
|
|
tokens.
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
for id in $LEGACY_IDS; do \
|
|
consul acl token update -id $id -policy-name "migrated-$id" -upgrade-legacy; \
|
|
done
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The update is now complete, all legacy tokens are now new tokens with identical
|
|
secrets and enforcement rules.
|
|
|
|
### Combining Policies
|
|
|
|
This strategy has more manual elements but results in a cleaner and more
|
|
manageable set of policies than the fully automatic solutions. Note that this is
|
|
**just an example** to illustrate a few ways you may choose to merge or
|
|
manipulate policies.
|
|
|
|
#### Find All Unique Policies
|
|
|
|
You can get the AccessorID of every legacy token from the API. For example,
|
|
using `curl` and `jq` in bash:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ LEGACY_IDS=$(curl -sH "X-Consul-Token: $CONSUL_HTTP_TOKEN" \
|
|
'localhost:8500/v1/acl/tokens' | jq -r '.[] | select (.Legacy) | .AccessorID')
|
|
$ echo "$LEGACY_IDS"
|
|
8b65fdf9-303e-0894-9f87-e71b3273600c
|
|
d9deb39b-1b30-e100-b9c5-04aba3f593a1
|
|
f2bce42e-cdcc-848d-28ca-cfd0556a22e3
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Now we want to read the actual policy for each legacy token and de-duplicate
|
|
them. We can use the `translate-rules` helper sub-command which will read the
|
|
token's policy and return a new ACL policy that is exactly equivalent.
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ for id in $LEGACY_IDS; do \
|
|
echo "Policy for $id:"
|
|
consul acl translate-rules -token-accessor "$id"; \
|
|
done
|
|
Policy for 8b65fdf9-303e-0894-9f87-e71b3273600c:
|
|
service_prefix "bar" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
Policy for d9deb39b-1b30-e100-b9c5-04aba3f593a1:
|
|
service_prefix "foo" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
Policy for f2bce42e-cdcc-848d-28ca-cfd0556a22e3:
|
|
service_prefix "bar" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Notice that two policies are the same and one different.
|
|
|
|
We can change the loop above to take a hash of this policy definition to
|
|
de-duplicate the policies into a set of files locally. This example uses command
|
|
available on macOS but equivalents for other platforms should be easy to find.
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ mkdir policies
|
|
$ for id in $LEGACY_IDS; do \
|
|
# Fetch the equivalent new policy rules based on the legacy token rules
|
|
NEW_POLICY=$(consul acl translate-rules -token-accessor "$id"); \
|
|
# Sha1 hash the rules
|
|
HASH=$(echo -n "$NEW_POLICY" | shasum | awk '{ print $1 }'); \
|
|
# Write rules to a policy file named with the hash to de-duplicated
|
|
echo "$NEW_POLICY" > policies/$HASH.hcl; \
|
|
done
|
|
$ tree policies
|
|
policies
|
|
├── 024ce11f26f59436c518fb31f0999d1400485c17.hcl
|
|
└── 501b787c9444fbd62f346ab257eeb27197be2444.hcl
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Cleaning Up Policies
|
|
|
|
You can now manually inspect and potentially edit these policies. For example we
|
|
could rename them according to their intended use. In this case we maintain the
|
|
hash as it will allow us to match tokens to policies later.
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ cat policies/024ce11f26f59436c518fb31f0999d1400485c17.hcl
|
|
service_prefix "bar" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
$ # Add human-readable suffix to the file name so policies end up clearly named
|
|
$ mv policies/024ce11f26f59436c518fb31f0999d1400485c17.hcl \
|
|
policies/024ce11f26f59436c518fb31f0999d1400485c17-bar-service.hcl
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
You might also choose to tighten up the rules, for example if you know you never
|
|
rely on prefix-matching the service name `foo` you might choose to modify the
|
|
policy to use exact match.
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ cat policies/501b787c9444fbd62f346ab257eeb27197be2444.hcl
|
|
service_prefix "foo" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
$ echo 'service "foo" { policy = "write" }' > policies/501b787c9444fbd62f346ab257eeb27197be2444.hcl
|
|
$ # Add human-readable suffix to the file name so policies end up clearly named
|
|
$ mv policies/501b787c9444fbd62f346ab257eeb27197be2444.hcl \
|
|
policies/501b787c9444fbd62f346ab257eeb27197be2444-foo-service.hcl
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Creating Policies
|
|
|
|
We now have a minimal set of policies to create, with human-readable names. We
|
|
can create each one with something like the following.
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ for p in $(ls policies | grep ".hcl"); do \
|
|
# Extract the hash part of the file name
|
|
HASH=$(echo "$p" | cut -d - -f 1); \
|
|
# Extract the name suffix without .hcl
|
|
NAME=$(echo "$p" | cut -d - -f 2- | cut -d . -f 1); \
|
|
# Create new policy based on the rules in the file and the name we gave
|
|
consul acl policy create -name $NAME \
|
|
-rules "@policies/$p" \
|
|
-description "Migrated from legacy token"; \
|
|
done
|
|
ID: da2a9f9b-4e44-13f8-e308-76ce7a8dcb21
|
|
Name: bar-service
|
|
Description: Migrated from legacy token
|
|
Datacenters:
|
|
Rules:
|
|
service_prefix "bar" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ID: 9fbded86-9140-efe4-b661-c8bd07b6c584
|
|
Name: foo-service
|
|
Description: Migrated from legacy token
|
|
Datacenters:
|
|
Rules:
|
|
service "foo" { policy = "write" }
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Upgrading Tokens
|
|
|
|
Finally we can map our existing tokens to those policies using the hash in the
|
|
policy file names. The `-upgrade-legacy` flag removes the token's legacy
|
|
embedded rules at the same time as associating them with the new policies
|
|
created from those rules.
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
$ for id in $LEGACY_IDS; do \
|
|
NEW_POLICY=$(consul acl translate-rules -token-accessor "$id"); \
|
|
HASH=$(echo -n "$NEW_POLICY" | shasum | awk '{ print $1 }'); \
|
|
# Lookup the hash->new policy mapping from the policy file names
|
|
POLICY_FILE=$(ls policies | grep "^$HASH"); \
|
|
POLICY_NAME=$(echo "$POLICY_FILE" | cut -d - -f 2- | cut -d . -f 1); \
|
|
echo "==> Mapping token $id to policy $POLICY_NAME"; \
|
|
consul acl token update -id $id -policy-name $POLICY_NAME -upgrade-legacy; \
|
|
done
|
|
==> Mapping token 8b65fdf9-303e-0894-9f87-e71b3273600c to policy bar-service
|
|
Token updated successfully.
|
|
AccessorID: 8b65fdf9-303e-0894-9f87-e71b3273600c
|
|
SecretID: 3dbb3981-7654-733a-3475-5ce20fc5a7b9
|
|
Description:
|
|
Local: false
|
|
Create Time: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC
|
|
Policies:
|
|
da2a9f9b-4e44-13f8-e308-76ce7a8dcb21 - bar-service
|
|
==> Mapping token d9deb39b-1b30-e100-b9c5-04aba3f593a1 to policy foo-service
|
|
Token updated successfully.
|
|
AccessorID: d9deb39b-1b30-e100-b9c5-04aba3f593a1
|
|
SecretID: 5f54733b-4c76-eb74-8781-3550c20f4969
|
|
Description:
|
|
Local: false
|
|
Create Time: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC
|
|
Policies:
|
|
9fbded86-9140-efe4-b661-c8bd07b6c584 - foo-service
|
|
==> Mapping token f2bce42e-cdcc-848d-28ca-cfd0556a22e3 to policy bar-service
|
|
Token updated successfully.
|
|
AccessorID: f2bce42e-cdcc-848d-28ca-cfd0556a22e3
|
|
SecretID: f3aaa3e2-2c6f-cf3c-1e86-454de728e8ab
|
|
Description:
|
|
Local: false
|
|
Create Time: 0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC
|
|
Policies:
|
|
da2a9f9b-4e44-13f8-e308-76ce7a8dcb21 - bar-service
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
At this point all tokens are upgraded and can use new ACL features while
|
|
retaining the same secret clients are already using.
|