Prior to this commit, all peer services were transmitted as connect-enabled
as long as a one or more mesh-gateways were healthy. With this change, there
is now a difference between typical services and connect services transmitted
via peering.
A service will be reported as "connect-enabled" as long as any of these
conditions are met:
1. a connect-proxy sidecar is registered for the service name.
2. a connect-native instance of the service is registered.
3. a service resolver / splitter / router is registered for the service name.
4. a terminating gateway has registered the service.
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness
This commit includes the following:
Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private
Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved
Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces
Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml
Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes)
Why:
In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage.
There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations.
The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch)
Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem
Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root.
This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry.
The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory.
That then required rewriting all the imports.
Is this safe?
AFAICT yes
The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc)
Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
During peer stream replication we flatten checks from the source cluster and build one thin overall check to hide the irrelevant details from the consuming cluster. This flattening logic did correctly flip to non-passing if there were any non-passing checks, but WHICH status it got during that was random (warn/error).
Also it didn't represent "maintenance" operations. There is an api package call AggregatedStatus which more correctly flattened check statuses.
This PR replicated the more complete logic into the peer stream package.
This commit adds handling so that the replication stream considers
whether the user intends to peer through mesh gateways.
The subscription will return server or mesh gateway addresses depending
on the mesh configuration setting. These watches can be updated at
runtime by modifying the mesh config entry.
newMockSnapshotHandler has an assertion on t.Cleanup which gets called before the event publisher is cancelled. This commit reorders the context.WithCancel so it properly gets cancelled before the assertion is made.
This mimics xDS's discovery protocol where you must request a resource
explicitly for the exporting side to send those events to you.
As part of this I aligned the overall ResourceURL with the TypeURL that
gets embedded into the encoded protobuf Any construct. The
CheckServiceNodes is now wrapped in a better named "ExportedService"
struct now.
Previously, public referred to gRPC services that are both exposed on
the dedicated gRPC port and have their definitions in the proto-public
directory (so were considered usable by 3rd parties). Whereas private
referred to services on the multiplexed server port that are only usable
by agents and other servers.
Now, we're splitting these definitions, such that external/internal
refers to the port and public/private refers to whether they can be used
by 3rd parties.
This is necessary because the peering replication API needs to be
exposed on the dedicated port, but is not (yet) suitable for use by 3rd
parties.
Ronald