Commit Graph

13 Commits (eddd6480956e2dee36fb0c7e336088dc2cd30223)

Author SHA1 Message Date
John Cowen 72be2dd204
ui: Ensure we check intention service prefix permissions for per service (#11409)
Port of: Ensure we check intention service prefix permissions for per service (#11270)

Previously, when showing some action buttons for 'per service intentions' we used a global 'can I do something with any intention' permission to decide whether to show a certain button or not. If a user has a token that does not have 'global' intention permissions, but does have intention permissions on one or more specific services (for example via service / service_prefix), this meant that we did not show them certain buttons required to create/edit the intentions for this specific service.

This PR adds that extra permissions check so we now check the intentions permissions per service instead of using the 'global' "can I edit intentions" question/request.

**Notes:**

- If a HTML button is `disabled` this means tippy.js doesn't adopt the
popover properly and subsequently hide it from the user, so aswell as
just disabling the button so you can't active the popover, we also don't
even put the popover on the page
- If `ability.item` or `ability.item.Resources` are empty then assume no access

**We don't try to disable service > right hand side intention actions here**

Whether you can create intentions for a service depends on the
_destination_ of the intention you would like to create. For the
topology view going from the LHS to the center, this is straightforwards
as we only need to know the permissions for the central service, as when
you are going from the LHS to the center, the center is the
_destination_.

When going from the center to the RHS the _destination[s]_ are on the
RHS. This means we need to know the permissions for potentially 1000s of
services all in one go in order to know when to show a button or not.

We can't realistically discover the permissions for service > RHS
services as we'd have either make a HTTP request per right hand service,
or potentially make an incredibly large POST request for all the
potentially 1000s of services on the right hand side (more preferable to
1000s of HTTP requests).

Therefore for the moment at least we keep the old functionality (thin client)
for the middle to RHS here. If you do go to click on the button and you
don't have permissions to update the intention you will still not be
able to update it, only you won't know this until you click the button
(at which point you'll get a UI visible 403 error)

Note: We reversed the conditional here between 1.10 and 1.11

So this make 100% sense that the port is different here to 1.11
2021-11-04 12:10:28 +00:00
John Cowen 76f5de1455
ui: Ensure dc selector correctly shows the currently selected dc (#11380)
* ui: Ensure dc selector correctly shows the currently selected dc

* ui: Restrict access to non-default partitions in non-primaries (#11420)

This PR restricts access via the UI to only the default partition when in a non-primary datacenter i.e. you can only have multiple (non-default) partitions in the primary datacenter.
2021-10-26 19:26:04 +01:00
John Cowen baa377ddca
ui: Adds initial CRUD for partitions (#11188)
* Add `is` and `test` helpers in a similar vein to `can`

Adds 2 new helpers in a similar vein to ember-cans can:

- `is` allows you to use vocab/phrases such as (is "something model") which calls isSomething() on the models ability.
- `test` allows you to use vocab/phrases such as (test "is something model") or (test "can something model")which calls isSomething() / canSomething() on the models ability. Mostly using the is helper and the can helper. It's basically the is/can helper combined.

* Adds TextInput component + related modifiers/helpers/machines/services (#11189)

Adds a few new components/modifiers/helpers to aid building forms.

- state-chart helper, used in lieu of a more generic approach for requiring our statecharts.
- A few modifications to our existing disabled modifier.
- A new 'validation' modifier, a super small form validation approach built to make use of state charts (optionally). Eventually we should be able to replace our current validation approach (ember-changeset-validations + extra deps) with this.
- A new TextInput component, which is the first of our new components specifically to make it easy to build forms with validations. This is still a WIP, I left some comments in pointing out where this one would be progressed, but as we don't need the planned functionality yet, I left it where it was. All of this will be fleshed out more at a later date.

Documentation is included for all of ^

* ui: Adds initial CRUD for partitions (#11190)

Adds basic CRUD support for partitions. Engineering-wise probably the biggest takeaway here is that we needed to write very little javascript code to add this entire feature, and the little javascript we did need to write was very straightforwards. Everything is pretty much just HTML. Another note to make is that both ember-changeset and ember-data (model layer things) are now completely abstracted away from the view layer of the application.

New components:

- Consul::Partition::Form
- Consul::Partition::List
- Consul::Partition::Notifications
- Consul::Partition::SearchBar
- Consul::Partition::Selector

See additional documentation here for more details

New Route templates:

- index.hbs partition listing/searching/filtering
- edit.hbs partition editing and creation

Additionally:

There is some additional debug work here for better observability and to prevent any errors regarding our href-to usage when a dc is not available in our documentation site.

Our softDelete functionality has been DRYed out a little to be used across two repos.

isLinkable was removed from our ListCollection component for lists like upstream and service listing, and instead use our new is helper from within the ListCollection, meaning we've added a few more lighterweight templateOnly components.

* ui: Exclude all debug-like files from the build (#11211)

This PR adds **/*-debug.* to our test/prod excluded files (realised I needed to add test-support.js also so added that here as its more or less the same thing). Conditionally juggling ES6 static imports (specifically debug ones) for this was also getting a little hairy, so I moved it all to use the same approach as our conditional routes. All in all it brings the vendor build back down to ~430kb gzipped.
2021-10-08 16:29:30 +01:00
John Cowen bce724baf1
ui: Don't show the CRD menu for read-only intentions (#11149)
* ui: Don't show the CRD menu for read-only intentions

The UI bug here manifests itself only when a user/token is configured to have read-only access to intentions. Instead of only letting folks click to see a read only page of the intention, we would show an additional message saying that the intention was read-only due to it being 'Managed by [a kubernetes] CRD'. Whilst the intention was still read only, this extra message was still confusing for users.

This PR fixes up the conditional logic and further moves the logic to use ember-can - looking at the history of the files in question, this bug snuck itself in partly due to it being 'permission-y type stuff' previous to using ember-can and when something being editable or not was nothing to do with ACLs. Then we moved to start using ember-can without completely realising what IsEditable previously meant. So overall the code here is a tiny bit clearer/cleaner by adding a proper can view CRD intention instead of overloading the idea of 'editability'.
2021-09-27 17:19:32 +01:00
John Cowen cf638ee551
ui: Always show main navigation Key/Value link (#10916)
* ui: Ignore response from API for KV permissions

Currently there is no way for us to use our HTTP authorization API
endpoint to tell us whether a user has access to any KVs (including the
case where a user may not have access to the root KV store, but do have
access to a sub item)

This is a little weird still as in the above case the user would click
on this link and still get a 403 for the root, and then have to manually
type in the URL for the KV they do have access to.

Despite this we think this change makes sense as at least something about KV is
visible in the main navigation.

Once we have the ability to know if any KVs are accessible, we can add
this guard back in.

We'd initially just removed the logic around the button, but then
noticed there may be further related KV issues due to the nested nature
of KVs so we finally decided on simply ignoring the responses from the
HTTP API, essentially reverting the KV area back to being a thin client.
This means when things are revisited in the backend we can undo this
easily change in one place.

* Move acceptance tests to use ACLs perms instead of KV ones
2021-09-22 18:23:59 +01:00
John Cowen fc14a412fd
ui: Partitions Application Layer (#11017)
* Add Partition to all our models

* Add partitions into our serializers/fingerprinting

* Make some amends to a few adapters ready for partitions

* Amend blueprints to avoid linting error

* Update all  our repositories to include partitions, also

Remove enabled/disable nspace repo and just use a nspace with
conditionals

* Ensure nspace and parition parameters always return '' no matter what

* Ensure data-sink finds the model properly

This will later be replaced by a @dataSink decorator but we are find
kicking that can down the road a little more

* Add all the new partition data layer

* Add a way to set the title of the page from inside the route

and make it accessibile via a route announcer

* Make the Consul Route the default/basic one

* Tweak nspace and partition abilities not to check the length

* Thread partition through all the components that need it

* Some ACL tweaks

* Move the entire app to use partitions

* Delete all the tests we no longer need

* Update some Unit tests to use partition

* Fix up KV title tests

* Fix up a few more acceptance tests

* Fixup and temporarily ignore some acceptance tests

* Stop using ember-cli-page-objects fillable as it doesn't seem to work

* Fix lint error

* Remove old ACL related test

* Add a tick after filling out forms

* Fix token warning modal

* Found some more places where we need a partition var

* Fixup some more acceptance tests

* Tokens still needs a repo service for CRUD

* Remove acceptance tests we no longer need

* Fixup and "FIXME ignore" a few tests

* Remove an s

* Disable blocking queries for KV to revert to previous release for now

* Fixup adapter tests to follow async/function resolving interface

* Fixup all the serializer integration tests

* Fixup service/repo integration tests

* Fixup deleting acceptance test

* Fixup some ent tests

* Make sure nspaces passes the dc through for when thats important

* ...aaaand acceptance nspaces with the extra dc param
2021-09-15 19:50:11 +01:00
John Cowen b16a6fa033
ui: Adds Partitions to the HTTP layer (#10447)
This PR mainly adds partition to our HTTP adapter. Additionally and perhaps most importantly, we've also taken the opportunity to move our 'conditional namespaces' deeper into the app.

The reason for doing this was, we like that namespaces should be thought of as required instead of conditional, 'special' things and would like the same thinking to be applied to partitions.

Now, instead of using code throughout the app throughout the adapters to add/remove namespaces or partitions depending on whether they are enabled or not. As a UI engineer you just pretend that namespaces and partitions are always enabled, and we remove them for you deeper in the app, out of the way of you forgetting to treat these properties as a special case.

Notes:

Added a PartitionAbility while we were there (not used as yet)
Started to remove the CONSTANT variables we had just for property names. I prefer that our adapters are as readable and straightforwards as possible, it just looks like HTTP.
We'll probably remove our formatDatacenter method we use also at some point, it was mainly too make it look the same as our previous formatNspace, but now we don't have that, it instead now looks different!
We enable parsing of partition in the UIs URL, but this is feature flagged so still does nothing just yet.
All of the test changes were related to the fact that we were treating client.url as a function rather than a method, and now that we reference this in client.url (etc) it needs binding to client.
2021-09-15 18:09:55 +01:00
Kenia a777b0a9ba
ui: Disabling policy form fields from users with 'read' permissions (#10902) 2021-08-25 09:42:05 -04:00
John Cowen 54f0cd812a
ui: Show the correct 'ACLs Disabled' page when ACLs are disabled (#10604)
Adds 'can access ACLs' which means one of two things

1. When ACLs are disabled I can access the 'please enable ACLs' page
2. When ACLs are enabled, its the same as canRead
2021-07-14 18:52:13 +01:00
John Cowen 2e4c9f5330
ui: Support Route optional parameters/segments (#10212)
Moves our URLs with 'optional namespace segment' into a separately abstracted 'optional URL segment' feature
2021-05-26 17:43:46 +01:00
John Cowen aca7976580
ui: Adds warning icon to side menu when ACLs are disabled (#9864)
* ui: Adds warning icon to side menu when ACLs are are disabled
2021-03-17 11:23:00 +00:00
John Cowen fa6687b7f4
ui: Implement ACLs access based on ACLs (#9835)
Adds restrictions to everything within the ACLs (and nspaces) area based on your ACLs (including readonly views etc.)
2021-03-11 09:29:11 +00:00
John Cowen 8263879e6f
ui: Restrict the viewing/editing of certain UI elements based on the users ACLs (#9687)
This commit use the internal authorize endpoint along wiht ember-can to further restrict user access to certain UI features and navigational elements depending on the users ACL token
2021-02-19 16:42:16 +00:00