Description
Add x-fowarded-client-cert information on trusted incoming connections.
Envoy provides support forwarding and annotating the
x-forwarded-client-cert header via the forward_client_cert_details
set_current_client_cert_details filter fields. It would be helpful for
consul to support this directly in its config. The escape hatches are
a bit cumbersome for this purpose.
This has been implemented on incoming connections to envoy. Outgoing
(from the local service through the sidecar) will not have a
certificate, and so are left alone.
A service on an incoming connection will now get headers something like this:
```
X-Forwarded-Client-Cert:[By=spiffe://efad7282-d9b2-3298-f6d8-38b37fb58df3.consul/ns/default/dc/dc1/svc/counting;Hash=61ad5cbdfcb50f5a3ec0ca60923d61613c149a9d4495010a64175c05a0268ab2;Cert="-----BEGIN%20CERTIFICATE-----%0AMIICHDCCAcOgAwIBAgIBCDAKBggqhkjOPQQDAjAxMS8wLQYDVQQDEyZwcmktMTli%0AYXdyb2YuY29uc3VsLmNhLmVmYWQ3MjgyLmNvbnN1bDAeFw0yMjA0MjkwMzE0NTBa%0AFw0yMjA1MDIwMzE0NTBaMAAwWTATBgcqhkjOPQIBBggqhkjOPQMBBwNCAARVIZ7Y%0AZEXfbOGBfxGa7Vuok1MIng%2FuzLQK2xLVlSTIPDbO5hstTGP%2B%2FGx182PYFP3jYqk5%0Aq6rYWe1wiPNMA30Io4H8MIH5MA4GA1UdDwEB%2FwQEAwIDuDAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggr%0ABgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwEwDAYDVR0TAQH%2FBAIwADApBgNVHQ4EIgQgrp4q50oX%0AHHghMbxz5Bk8OJFWMdfgH0Upr350WlhyxvkwKwYDVR0jBCQwIoAgUe6uERAIj%2FLM%0AyuFzDc3Wbp9TGAKBJYAwyhF14ToOQCMwYgYDVR0RAQH%2FBFgwVoZUc3BpZmZlOi8v%0AZWZhZDcyODItZDliMi0zMjk4LWY2ZDgtMzhiMzdmYjU4ZGYzLmNvbnN1bC9ucy9k%0AZWZhdWx0L2RjL2RjMS9zdmMvZGFzaGJvYXJkMAoGCCqGSM49BAMCA0cAMEQCIDwb%0AFlchufggNTijnQ5SUcvTZrWlZyq%2FrdVC20nbbmWLAiAVshNNv1xBqJI1NmY2HI9n%0AgRMfb8aEPVSuxEHhqy57eQ%3D%3D%0A-----END%20CERTIFICATE-----%0A";Chain="-----BEGIN%20CERTIFICATE-----%0AMIICHDCCAcOgAwIBAgIBCDAKBggqhkjOPQQDAjAxMS8wLQYDVQQDEyZwcmktMTli%0AYXdyb2YuY29uc3VsLmNhLmVmYWQ3MjgyLmNvbnN1bDAeFw0yMjA0MjkwMzE0NTBa%0AFw0yMjA1MDIwMzE0NTBaMAAwWTATBgcqhkjOPQIBBggqhkjOPQMBBwNCAARVIZ7Y%0AZEXfbOGBfxGa7Vuok1MIng%2FuzLQK2xLVlSTIPDbO5hstTGP%2B%2FGx182PYFP3jYqk5%0Aq6rYWe1wiPNMA30Io4H8MIH5MA4GA1UdDwEB%2FwQEAwIDuDAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggr%0ABgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwEwDAYDVR0TAQH%2FBAIwADApBgNVHQ4EIgQgrp4q50oX%0AHHghMbxz5Bk8OJFWMdfgH0Upr350WlhyxvkwKwYDVR0jBCQwIoAgUe6uERAIj%2FLM%0AyuFzDc3Wbp9TGAKBJYAwyhF14ToOQCMwYgYDVR0RAQH%2FBFgwVoZUc3BpZmZlOi8v%0AZWZhZDcyODItZDliMi0zMjk4LWY2ZDgtMzhiMzdmYjU4ZGYzLmNvbnN1bC9ucy9k%0AZWZhdWx0L2RjL2RjMS9zdmMvZGFzaGJvYXJkMAoGCCqGSM49BAMCA0cAMEQCIDwb%0AFlchufggNTijnQ5SUcvTZrWlZyq%2FrdVC20nbbmWLAiAVshNNv1xBqJI1NmY2HI9n%0AgRMfb8aEPVSuxEHhqy57eQ%3D%3D%0A-----END%20CERTIFICATE-----%0A";Subject="";URI=spiffe://efad7282-d9b2-3298-f6d8-38b37fb58df3.consul/ns/default/dc/dc1/svc/dashboard]
```
Closes#12852
- `tls.incoming`: applies to the inbound mTLS targeting the public
listener on `connect-proxy` and `terminating-gateway` envoy instances
- `tls.outgoing`: applies to the outbound mTLS dialing upstreams from
`connect-proxy` and `ingress-gateway` envoy instances
Fixes#11966
Currently the config_entry.go subsystem delegates authorization decisions via the ConfigEntry interface CanRead and CanWrite code. Unfortunately this returns a true/false value and loses the details of the source.
This is not helpful, especially since it the config subsystem can be more complex to understand, since it covers so many domains.
This refactors CanRead/CanWrite to return a structured error message (PermissionDenied or the like) with more details about the reason for denial.
Part of #12241
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
CatalogDestinationsOnly is a passthrough that would enable dialing
addresses outside of Consul's catalog. However, when this flag is set to
true only _connect_ endpoints for services can be dialed.
This flag is being renamed to signal that non-Connect endpoints can't be
dialed by transparent proxies when the value is set to true.
No config entry needs a Kind field. It is only used to determine the Go type to
target. As we introduce new config entries (like this one) we can remove the kind field
and have the GetKind method return the single supported value.
In this case (similar to proxy-defaults) the Name field is also unnecessary. We always
use the same value. So we can omit the name field entirely.
DanStough