* Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package
This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository.
* Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package
This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository.
* Updating the license from MPL to Business Source License
Going forward, this project will be licensed under the Business Source License v1.1. Please see our blog post for more details at <Blog URL>, FAQ at www.hashicorp.com/licensing-faq, and details of the license at www.hashicorp.com/bsl.
* add missing license headers
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1
---------
Co-authored-by: hashicorp-copywrite[bot] <110428419+hashicorp-copywrite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- Simplifies how we 'import' our configuration files a little in order to make them more grokable.
- Starts to exclude files based on explicit configuration rather than convention.
- Adds the first instance of us being able to select an implementation (of multiple) of a component at runtime.
This sounds a bit 'backwards' as the end goal here is to add an improved UX to partitions, not namespaces. The reason for doing it this way is that Namespaces already has a type of 'improved UX' CRUD in that it has one to many relationship in the form when saving your namespaces (the end goal for partitions). In moving Namespaces to use the same approach as partitions we:
- Ensure the new approach works with one-to-many forms.
- Test the new approach without writing a single test (we already have a bunch of tests for namespaces which are now testing the approach used by both namespaces and partitions)
Additionally:
- Fixes issue with missing default nspace in the nspace selector
- In doing when checking to see that things where consistent between the two, I found a few little minor problems with the Admin Partition CRUD so fixed those up here also.
- Removed the old style Nspace notifications
hashicorp-copywrite[bot]