Commit Graph

15 Commits (c0bd8f28290b9545e340d043d458bd7bc19724fb)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Semir Patel 7c72bba225
[BACKPORT] 1.16.x manual backport of OSS->CE branch (#18549) 2023-08-23 11:53:44 -05:00
Dan Stough d935c7b466
[OSS] gRPC Blocking Queries (#17426)
* feat: initial grpc blocking queries

* changelog and docs update
2023-05-23 17:29:10 -04:00
Ronald 94ec4eb2f4
copyright headers for agent folder (#16704)
* copyright headers for agent folder

* Ignore test data files

* fix proto files and remove headers in agent/uiserver folder

* ignore deep-copy files
2023-03-28 14:39:22 -04:00
Matt Keeler 085c0addc0
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness

This commit includes the following:

Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private
Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved
Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces
Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml
Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes)

Why:

In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage.
There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations.
The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch)
Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem
Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root.
This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry.
The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory.
That then required rewriting all the imports.

Is this safe?

AFAICT yes
The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc)
Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 16:14:46 -05:00
malizz 84b0f408fa
Support Stale Queries for Trust Bundle Lookups (#14724)
* initial commit

* add tags, add conversations

* add test for query options utility functions

* update previous tests

* fix test

* don't error out on empty context

* add changelog

* update decode config
2022-09-28 09:56:59 -07:00
freddygv b544ce6485 Add ACL enforcement to peering endpoints 2022-07-25 09:34:29 -06:00
Matt Keeler 05b5e7e2ca
Enable partition support for peering establishment (#13772)
Prior to this the dialing side of the peering would only ever work within the default partition. This commit allows properly parsing the partition field out of the API struct request body, query param and header.
2022-07-15 10:07:07 -04:00
R.B. Boyer 7001e1151c
peering: rename initiate to establish in the context of the APIs (#13419) 2022-06-10 11:10:46 -05:00
Chris S. Kim fcdd031911
Revert getPathSuffixUnescaped (#13256) 2022-06-01 13:17:14 -04:00
R.B. Boyer a85b8a4705
api: ensure peering API endpoints do not use protobufs (#13204)
I noticed that the JSON api endpoints for peerings json encodes protobufs directly, rather than converting them into their `api` package equivalents before marshal/unmarshaling them.

I updated this and used `mog` to do the annoying part in the middle. 

Other changes:
- the status enum was converted into the friendlier string form of the enum for readability with tools like `curl`
- some of the `api` library functions were slightly modified to match other similar endpoints in UX (cc: @ndhanushkodi )
- peeringRead returns `nil` if not found
- partitions are NOT inferred from the agent's partition (matching 1.11-style logic)
2022-05-25 13:43:35 -05:00
R.B. Boyer 2e72f44fda
peering: accept replication stream of discovery chain information at the importing side (#13151) 2022-05-19 16:37:52 -05:00
FFMMM b8ce8e36fb
add err msg on PeeringRead not found (#12986)
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Freddy <freddygv@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-05-09 15:22:42 -07:00
FFMMM 3b3f001580
[sync oss] api: add peering api module (#12911) 2022-05-02 11:49:05 -07:00
Chris S. Kim 0d66301ea7
Cleanup peering files that used error types that were removed (#12892) 2022-04-29 14:02:26 -04:00
R.B. Boyer f507f62f3c
peering: initial sync (#12842)
- Add endpoints related to peering: read, list, generate token, initiate peering
- Update node/service/check table indexing to account for peers
- Foundational changes for pushing service updates to a peer
- Plumb peer name through Health.ServiceNodes path

see: ENT-1765, ENT-1280, ENT-1283, ENT-1283, ENT-1756, ENT-1739, ENT-1750, ENT-1679,
     ENT-1709, ENT-1704, ENT-1690, ENT-1689, ENT-1702, ENT-1701, ENT-1683, ENT-1663,
     ENT-1650, ENT-1678, ENT-1628, ENT-1658, ENT-1640, ENT-1637, ENT-1597, ENT-1634,
     ENT-1613, ENT-1616, ENT-1617, ENT-1591, ENT-1588, ENT-1596, ENT-1572, ENT-1555

Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <rb@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Evan Culver <eculver@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Nitya Dhanushkodi <nitya@hashicorp.com>
2022-04-21 17:34:40 -05:00