This is only configured in xDS when a service with an L7 protocol is
exported.
They also load any relevant trust bundles for the peered services to
eventually use for L7 SPIFFE validation during mTLS termination.
When converting from Consul intentions to xds RBAC rules, services imported from other peers must encode additional data like partition (from the remote cluster) and trust domain.
This PR updates the PeeringTrustBundle to hold the sending side's local partition as ExportedPartition. It also updates RBAC code to encode SpiffeIDs of imported services with the ExportedPartition and TrustDomain.
For mTLS to work between two proxies in peered clusters with different root CAs,
proxies need to configure their outbound listener to use different root certificates
for validation.
Up until peering was introduced proxies would only ever use one set of root certificates
to validate all mesh traffic, both inbound and outbound. Now an upstream proxy
may have a leaf certificate signed by a CA that's different from the dialing proxy's.
This PR makes changes to proxycfg and xds so that the upstream TLS validation
uses different root certificates depending on which cluster is being dialed.
The importing peer will need to know what SNI and SPIFFE name
corresponds to each exported service. Additionally it will need to know
at a high level the protocol in use (L4/L7) to generate the appropriate
connection pool and local metrics.
For replicated connect synthetic entities we edit the `Connect{}` part
of a `NodeService` to have a new section:
{
"PeerMeta": {
"SNI": [
"web.default.default.owt.external.183150d5-1033-3672-c426-c29205a576b8.consul"
],
"SpiffeID": [
"spiffe://183150d5-1033-3672-c426-c29205a576b8.consul/ns/default/dc/dc1/svc/web"
],
"Protocol": "tcp"
}
}
This data is then replicated and saved as-is at the importing side. Both
SNI and SpiffeID are slices for now until I can be sure we don't need
them for how mesh gateways will ultimately work.
* Support vault namespaces in connect CA
Follow on to some missed items from #12655
From an internal ticket "Support standard "Vault namespace in the
path" semantics for Connect Vault CA Provider"
Vault allows the namespace to be specified as a prefix in the path of
a PKI definition, but our usage of the Vault API includes calls that
don't support a namespaced key. In particular the sys.* family of
calls simply appends the key, instead of prefixing the namespace in
front of the path.
Unfortunately it is difficult to reliably parse a path with a
namespace; only vault knows what namespaces are present, and the '/'
separator can be inside a key name, as well as separating path
elements. This is in use in the wild; for example
'dc1/intermediate-key' is a relatively common naming schema.
Instead we add two new fields: RootPKINamespace and
IntermediatePKINamespace, which are the absolute namespace paths
'prefixed' in front of the respective PKI Paths.
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
Introduces a gRPC endpoint for signing Connect leaf certificates. It's also
the first of the public gRPC endpoints to perform leader-forwarding, so
establishes the pattern of forwarding over the multiplexed internal RPC port.
* Avoid doing list of /sys/mounts
From an internal ticket "Support standard "Vault namespace in the path" semantics for Connect Vault CA Provider"
Vault allows the namespace to be specified as a prefix in the path of
a PKI definition, but this doesn't currently work for
```IntermediatePKIPath``` specifications, because we attempt to list
all of the paths to check if ours is already defined. This doesn't
really work in a namespaced world.
This changes the IntermediatePKIPath code to follow the same pattern
as the root key, where we directly get the key rather than listing.
This code is difficult to write automated tests for because it relies
on features of Vault Enterprise, which isn't currently part of our
test framework, so it was tested manually.
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* add changelog
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Fix leaked Vault LifetimeRenewers
When the Vault CA Provider is reconfigured we do not stop the
LifetimeRenewers which can cause them to leak until the Consul processes
recycles. On Configure execute stopWatcher if it exists and is not nil
before starting a new renewal
* Add jitter before restarting the LifetimeWatcher
If we fail to login to Vault or our token is no longer valid we can
overwhelm a Vault instance with many requests very quickly by restarting
the LifetimeWatcher. Before restarting the LifetimeWatcher provide a
backoff time of 1 second or less.
* Use a retry.Waiter instead of RandomStagger
* changelog
* gofmt'd
* Swap out bool for atomic.Unit32 in test
* Provide some extra clarification in comment and changelog
* mogify needed pbcommon structs
* mogify needed pbconnect structs
* fix compilation errors and make config_translate_test pass
* add missing file
* remove redundant oss func declaration
* fix EnterpriseMeta to copy the right data for enterprise
* rename pbcommon package to pbcommongogo
* regenerate proto and mog files
* add missing mog files
* add pbcommon package
* pbcommon no mog
* fix enterprise meta code generation
* fix enterprise meta code generation (pbcommongogo)
* fix mog generation for gogo
* use `protoc-go-inject-tag` to inject tags
* rename proto package
* pbcommon no mog
* use `protoc-go-inject-tag` to inject tags
* add non gogo proto to make file
* fix proto get
Previously we were using two different criteria to decide where to run a
test. The main `go-test` job would skip Vault tests based on the
presence of the `vault` binary, but the `test-connect-ca-providers` job
would run tests based on the name.
This led to a scenario where a test may never run in CI.
To fix this problem I added a name check to the function we use to skip
the test. This should ensure that any test that requires vault is named
correctly to be run as part of the `test-connect-ca-providers` job.
At the same time I relaxed the regex we use. I verified this runs the
same tests using `go test --list Vault`. I made this change because a
bunch of tests in `agent/connect/ca` used `Vault` in the name, without
the underscores. Instead of changing a bunch of test names, this seemed
easier.
With this approach, the worst case is that we run a few extra tests in
the `test-connect-ca-providers` job, which doesn't seem like a problem.
The interface is documented as 'Sign will only return the leaf', and the other providers
only return the leaf. It seems like this was added during the initial implementation, so
is likely just something we missed. It doesn't break anything , but it does cause confusing cert chains
in the API response which could break something in the future.
This commit syncs ENT changes to the OSS repo.
Original commit details in ENT:
```
commit 569d25f7f4578981c3801e6e067295668210f748
Author: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu Feb 10 10:23:33 2022 -0800
Vendor fork net rpc (#1538)
* replace net/rpc w consul-net-rpc/net/rpc
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
* replace msgpackrpc and go-msgpack with fork from mono repo
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
* gofmt all files touched
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
```
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit makes two changes to the validation.
Previously we would call this validation in GenerateRoot, which happens
both on initialization (when a follower becomes leader), and when a
configuration is updated. We only want to do this validation during
config update so the logic was moved to the UpdateConfiguration
function.
Previously we would compare the config values against the actual cert.
This caused problems when the cert was created manually in Vault (not
created by Consul). Now we compare the new config against the previous
config. Using a already created CA cert should never error now.
Adding the key bit and types to the config should only error when
the previous values were not the defaults.
This test found a bug in the secondary. We were appending the root cert
to the PEM, but that cert was already appended. This was failing
validation in Vault here:
https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/blob/sdk/v0.3.0/sdk/helper/certutil/types.go#L329
Previously this worked because self signed certs have the same
SubjectKeyID and AuthorityKeyID. So having the same self-signed cert
repeated doesn't fail that check.
However with an intermediate that is not self-signed, those values are
different, and so we fail the check. A test I added in a previous commit
should show that this continues to work with self-signed root certs as
well.
set -euo pipefail
unset CDPATH
cd "$(dirname "$0")"
for f in $(git grep '\brequire := require\.New(' | cut -d':' -f1 | sort -u); do
echo "=== require: $f ==="
sed -i '/require := require.New(t)/d' $f
# require.XXX(blah) but not require.XXX(tblah) or require.XXX(rblah)
sed -i 's/\brequire\.\([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)(\([^tr]\)/require.\1(t,\2/g' $f
# require.XXX(tblah) but not require.XXX(t, blah)
sed -i 's/\brequire\.\([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)(\(t[^,]\)/require.\1(t,\2/g' $f
# require.XXX(rblah) but not require.XXX(r, blah)
sed -i 's/\brequire\.\([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)(\(r[^,]\)/require.\1(t,\2/g' $f
gofmt -s -w $f
done
for f in $(git grep '\bassert := assert\.New(' | cut -d':' -f1 | sort -u); do
echo "=== assert: $f ==="
sed -i '/assert := assert.New(t)/d' $f
# assert.XXX(blah) but not assert.XXX(tblah) or assert.XXX(rblah)
sed -i 's/\bassert\.\([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)(\([^tr]\)/assert.\1(t,\2/g' $f
# assert.XXX(tblah) but not assert.XXX(t, blah)
sed -i 's/\bassert\.\([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)(\(t[^,]\)/assert.\1(t,\2/g' $f
# assert.XXX(rblah) but not assert.XXX(r, blah)
sed -i 's/\bassert\.\([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)(\(r[^,]\)/assert.\1(t,\2/g' $f
gofmt -s -w $f
done
Previously we had a couple copies that reproduced the FSM operation.
These copies introduce risk that the test does not accurately match
production.
This PR removes the test versions of the FSM operation, and exports the
real production FSM operation so that it can be used in tests.
The consul provider tests did need to change because of this. Previously
we would return a hardcoded value of 2, but in production this value is
always incremented.
This makes it easier to fake, which will allow me to use the ConsulProvider as
an 'external PKI' to test a customer setup where the actual root CA is not
the root we use for the Consul CA.
Replaces a call to the state store to fetch the clusterID with the
clusterID field already available on the built-in provider.
* Support vault auth methods for the Vault connect CA provider
* Rotate the token (re-authenticate to vault using auth method) when the token can no longer be renewed
* Support Vault Namespaces explicitly in CA config
If there is a Namespace entry included in the Vault CA configuration,
set it as the Vault Namespace on the Vault client
Currently the only way to support Vault namespaces in the Consul CA
config is by doing one of the following:
1) Set the VAULT_NAMESPACE environment variable which will be picked up
by the Vault API client
2) Prefix all Vault paths with the namespace
Neither of these are super pleasant. The first requires direct access
and modification to the Consul runtime environment. It's possible and
expected, not super pleasant.
The second requires more indepth knowledge of Vault and how it uses
Namespaces and could be confusing for anyone without that context. It
also infers that it is not supported
* Add changelog
* Remove fmt.Fprint calls
* Make comment clearer
* Add next consul version to website docs
* Add new test for default configuration
* go mod tidy
* Add skip if vault not present
* Tweak changelog text
* add root_cert_ttl option for consul connect, vault ca providers
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
* add changelog, pr feedback
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update .changelog/11428.txt, more docs
Co-authored-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@hashicorp.com>
* Update website/content/docs/agent/options.mdx
Co-authored-by: Kyle Havlovitz <kylehav@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Kyle Havlovitz <kylehav@gmail.com>
To make it more clear which methods are necessary for each scenario. This can
also prevent problems which force all DCs to use the same Vault instance, which
is currently a problem.
R.B. Boyer