4 Commits (afe0f26143870fa4d0d1e5e93add167158bad696)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Kyle Havlovitz	2f7210bde2	Move IntermediateCertTTL to common CA config	4 years ago
Hans Hasselberg	6739fe6e83	connect: add validations around intermediate cert ttl (#7213)	5 years ago
Paul Banks	ef9f27cbc8	connect: tame thundering herd of CSRs on CA rotation (#5228) ... * Support rate limiting and concurrency limiting CSR requests on servers; handle CA rotations gracefully with jitter and backoff-on-rate-limit in client * Add CSR rate limiting docs * Fix config naming and add tests for new CA configs	6 years ago
Paul Banks	74f2a80a42	Fix CA pruning when CA config uses string durations. (#4669) ... * Fix CA pruning when CA config uses string durations. The tl;dr here is: - Configuring LeafCertTTL with a string like "72h" is how we do it by default and should be supported - Most of our tests managed to escape this by defining them as time.Duration directly - Out actual default value is a string - Since this is stored in a map[string]interface{} config, when it is written to Raft it goes through a msgpack encode/decode cycle (even though it's written from server not over RPC). - msgpack decode leaves the string as a `[]uint8` - Some of our parsers required string and failed - So after 1 hour, a default configured server would throw an error about pruning old CAs - If a new CA was configured that set LeafCertTTL as a time.Duration, things might be OK after that, but if a new CA was just configured from config file, intialization would cause same issue but always fail still so would never prune the old CA. - Mostly this is just a janky error that got passed tests due to many levels of complicated encoding/decoding. tl;dr of the tl;dr: Yay for type safety. Map[string]interface{} combined with msgpack always goes wrong but we somehow get bitten every time in a new way :D We already fixed this once! The main CA config had the same problem so @kyhavlov already wrote the mapstructure DecodeHook that fixes it. It wasn't used in several places it needed to be and one of those is notw in `structs` which caused a dependency cycle so I've moved them. This adds a whole new test thta explicitly tests the case that broke here. It also adds tests that would have failed in other places before (Consul and Vaul provider parsing functions). I'm not sure if they would ever be affected as it is now as we've not seen things broken with them but it seems better to explicitly test that and support it to not be bitten a third time! * Typo fix * Fix bad Uint8 usage	6 years ago