5 Commits (a3973a82ae1d9ad518a058d89ae10b006b5f9810)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Eric Haberkorn	eaa39f4ef5	add sameness group support to service resolver failover and redirects (#16664)	2 years ago
Eric Haberkorn	5f81662066	Add support for failover policies (#16505)	2 years ago
Andrew Stucki	4b661d1e0c	Add ServiceResolver RequestTimeout for route timeouts to make TerminatingGateway upstream timeouts configurable (#16495) ... * Leverage ServiceResolver ConnectTimeout for route timeouts to make TerminatingGateway upstream timeouts configurable * Regenerate golden files * Add RequestTimeout field * Add changelog entry	2 years ago
Andrew Stucki	0972697661	[API Gateway] Various fixes for Config Entry fields (#16347) ... * [API Gateway] Various fixes for Config Entry fields * simplify logic per PR review	2 years ago
Matt Keeler	085c0addc0	Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) ... Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.	2 years ago