Commit Graph

9 Commits (7cac91881157aed53e0fab79583d3b348a105425)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tauhid Anjum 5d294b26d3
NET-5824 Exported services api (#20015)
* Exported services api implemented

* Tests added, refactored code

* Adding server tests

* changelog added

* Proto gen added

* Adding codegen changes

* changing url, response object

* Fixing lint error by having namespace and partition directly

* Tests changes

* refactoring tests

* Simplified uniqueness logic for exported services, sorted the response in order of service name

* Fix lint errors, refactored code
2024-01-23 10:06:59 +05:30
Chris S. Kim 92ce814693
Remove old build tags (#19128) 2023-10-10 10:58:06 -04:00
Semir Patel 53e28a4963
OSS -> CE (community edition) changes (#18517) 2023-08-22 09:46:03 -05:00
hashicorp-copywrite[bot] 5fb9df1640
[COMPLIANCE] License changes (#18443)
* Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package

This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository.

* Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package

This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository.

* Updating the license from MPL to Business Source License

Going forward, this project will be licensed under the Business Source License v1.1. Please see our blog post for more details at <Blog URL>, FAQ at www.hashicorp.com/licensing-faq, and details of the license at www.hashicorp.com/bsl.

* add missing license headers

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

* Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1

---------

Co-authored-by: hashicorp-copywrite[bot] <110428419+hashicorp-copywrite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-08-11 09:12:13 -04:00
Ronald b64674623e
Copyright headers for missing files/folders (#16708)
* copyright headers for agent folder
2023-03-28 18:48:58 -04:00
Poonam Jadhav 9c64731a56
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646) 2023-03-20 11:24:29 -04:00
Matt Keeler 085c0addc0
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness

This commit includes the following:

Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private
Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved
Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces
Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml
Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes)

Why:

In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage.
There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations.
The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch)
Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem
Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root.
This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry.
The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory.
That then required rewriting all the imports.

Is this safe?

AFAICT yes
The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc)
Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 16:14:46 -05:00
Dan Upton ee2d47da83
Fix missing comment in generated enterprise rate-limit file (#15895)
Fixes bug in #15564 where gofmt would strip out the generated code
warning comment because it was on the same line as the build tag.
2023-01-05 10:31:14 +00:00
Dan Upton d4c435856b
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564)
Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type`
used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget
to add new endpoints.

Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so:

```
rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) {
  option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = {
    operation_type: READ,
  };
}
```

When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will
be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called
`.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory).

After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will
ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the
mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository,
it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints.

If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will
return an error like so:

```
RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with:

	import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto";

	service Bar {
	  rpc Foo(...) returns (...) {
	    option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = {
	      operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT,
	    };
	  }
	}
```

In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit
category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00