Commit Graph

5 Commits (7689a5ef2df8a92f476aabdb6ebd6e3696f8c39b)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ronald 94ec4eb2f4
copyright headers for agent folder (#16704)
* copyright headers for agent folder

* Ignore test data files

* fix proto files and remove headers in agent/uiserver folder

* ignore deep-copy files
2023-03-28 14:39:22 -04:00
Matt Keeler 085c0addc0
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness

This commit includes the following:

Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private
Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved
Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces
Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml
Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes)

Why:

In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage.
There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations.
The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch)
Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem
Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root.
This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry.
The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory.
That then required rewriting all the imports.

Is this safe?

AFAICT yes
The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc)
Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 16:14:46 -05:00
freddygv c04515a844 Use proto message for each secrets write op
Previously there was a field indicating the operation that triggered a
secrets write. Now there is a message for each operation and it contains
the secret ID being persisted.
2022-08-08 01:41:00 -06:00
freddygv 60d6e28c97 Pass explicit signal with op for secrets write
Previously the updates to the peering secrets UUID table relied on
inferring what action triggered the update based on a reconciliation
against the existing secrets.

Instead we now explicitly require the operation to be given so that the
inference isn't necessary. This makes the UUID table logic easier to
reason about and fixes some related bugs.

There is also an update so that the peering secrets get handled on
snapshots/restores.
2022-08-03 17:25:12 -05:00
Matt Keeler f74d0cef7a
Implement/Utilize secrets for Peering Replication Stream (#13977) 2022-08-01 10:33:18 -04:00