consul

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Matt Keeler	77f44fa878	Various bits of cleanup detected when using Go Workspaces (#17462 ) TLDR with many modules the versions included in each diverged quite a bit. Attempting to use Go Workspaces produces a bunch of errors. This commit: 1. Fixes envoy-library-references.sh to work again 2. Ensures we are pulling in go-control-plane@v0.11.0 everywhere (previously it was at that version in some modules and others were much older) 3. Remove one usage of golang/protobuf that caused us to have a direct dependency on it. 4. Remove deprecated usage of the Endpoint field in the grpc resolver.Target struct. The current version of grpc (v1.55.0) has removed that field and recommended replacement with URL.Opaque and calls to the Endpoint() func when needing to consume the previous field. 4. `go work init <all the paths to go.mod files>` && `go work sync`. This syncrhonized versions of dependencies from the main workspace/root module to all submodules 5. Updated .gitignore to ignore the go.work and go.work.sum files. This seems to be standard practice at the moment. 6. Update doc comments in protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit to be go fmt compatible 7. Upgraded makefile infra to perform linting, testing and go mod tidy on all modules in a flexible manner. 8. Updated linter rules to prevent usage of golang/protobuf 9. Updated a leader peering test to account for an extra colon in a grpc error message.	2 years ago
Ronald	b64674623e	Copyright headers for missing files/folders (#16708 ) * copyright headers for agent folder	2 years ago
Matt Keeler	085c0addc0	Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302 ) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.	2 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Matt Keeler

77f44fa878

Various bits of cleanup detected when using Go Workspaces (#17462 )

TLDR with many modules the versions included in each diverged quite a bit. Attempting to use Go Workspaces produces a bunch of errors.

This commit:

1. Fixes envoy-library-references.sh to work again
2. Ensures we are pulling in go-control-plane@v0.11.0 everywhere (previously it was at that version in some modules and others were much older)
3. Remove one usage of golang/protobuf that caused us to have a direct dependency on it.
4. Remove deprecated usage of the Endpoint field in the grpc resolver.Target struct. The current version of grpc (v1.55.0) has removed that field and recommended replacement with URL.Opaque and calls to the Endpoint() func when needing to consume the previous field.
4. `go work init <all the paths to go.mod files>` && `go work sync`. This syncrhonized versions of dependencies from the main workspace/root module to all submodules
5. Updated .gitignore to ignore the go.work and go.work.sum files. This seems to be standard practice at the moment.
6. Update doc comments in protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit to be go fmt compatible
7. Upgraded makefile infra to perform linting, testing and go mod tidy on all modules in a flexible manner.
8. Updated linter rules to prevent usage of golang/protobuf
9. Updated a leader peering test to account for an extra colon in a grpc error message.

Ronald

b64674623e

* copyright headers for agent folder

Matt Keeler

085c0addc0

Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302 )

Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness

This commit includes the following:

Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private
Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved
Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces
Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml
Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes)

Why:

In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage.
There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations.
The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch)
Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem
Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root.
This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry.
The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory.
That then required rewriting all the imports.

Is this safe?

AFAICT yes
The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc)
Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.

3 Commits (5f95f5f6d831abb840cc4a72a435469c5f3e43a4)